Posted on 05/27/2020 10:28:14 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
‘
Durham has made one Indictment.
A member of the public remotely threatening Adam Schiff.
No remote threats of Trump pursued.
You read that correctly.
‘
‘
Durham isn’t pressuring and flipping - which is part and parcel.
No movement this deep (in time elapsed) is not a good sign.
.
I think its clear Barr never intends to prosecute any of the deep state criminals, so in a nutshell the rule of law is gone. America cannot survive under this level of corruption. The President in my opinion must order the AG to enforce the law or replace him.
“We already know the unmasking of Trump officials was illegal and carries serious felony charges.”
I thought unmasking is legal. It’s the leaking of the calls that are illegal.
Nothing like a Texas Grand Jury to see through the BS and indict. There’s also nothing like a Texas jury to hang these seditious ba$tards.
You sure know a lot. Do you work for the DOJ?
That's a pretty ignorant thing to say.
You THINK its CLEAR?
Maybe your thinker's broke, cause it ain't 'clear'.
One of my big suspicions is that Obama was the one using Samantha Power’s name to unmask.
Unfortunately, I have very little hope the world will ever know the true story of Obama’s spygate.
“Unfortunately, I have very little hope the world will ever know the true story of Obama’s spygate.“
History is always written by the winners. Who writes the history being taught to the next generation of voters? The students of today will be responsible for preserving liberty in the future. Or not. Their decisions will be based on what they know.
Barr is and has always been Deep State. Remember Randy Weaver.....who had his wife shot and killed while holding a baby? Also Weaver’s young son was murdered.
Do some studying of that atrocity. You’ll meet none other than AG Barr.
“Western District of Texas”?
Is there any nexus to Texas?
It would have a more favorable jury pool than DC.
Really.
Ok tell me what I'm missing? Is it some of these recent headlines?
The Justice Department is dropping its investigations into controversial stock trades made by Sens. Kelly Loeffler, Dianne Feinstein and Jim Inhofe in the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic, their offices confirmed Tuesday.
Or maybe
"Nothing' to indicate Epstein death was not a suicide: Attorney General William Barr"
Oh goody, another investigation.
L
“Trust Sessions. Trust Wray. 2018 is going to be glorious.”
L
The Justice Department is dropping its investigations into controversial stock trades made by Sens. Kelly Loeffler, Dianne Feinstein and Jim Inhofe in the early stages of the coronavirus pandemic, their offices confirmed Tuesday.
"Nothing' to indicate Epstein death was not a suicide: Attorney General William Barr"
Here's what you're missing.
Each case and set of evidence is different than the other. Nothing you cited makes it 'clear Barr never intends to prosecute any of the deep state criminals'.
You are writing out of pure emotion. If you use logic and reason, you will discover that what you said is very dumb.
You are projecting a bit. You are the one writing out of emotion. My post is based in logic and fact. I gave just two examples of evidence Barr is not going to prosecute obama criminals but I could give many many more. I asked what makes you think otherwise and you have no response other than to claim my post is dumb so it looks like you can’t point to any tangible fact that indicates we will see indictments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.