Barr asks US attorney to further investigate 'unmasking' in 2016

The Hill ^ | 05 27 2020 | Rebecca Klar

[bagster]

You are projecting a bit. You are the one writing out of emotion.

See, "I know you are, but what am I?" is not an argument.

I gave just two examples of evidence Barr is not going to prosecute obama criminals but I could give many many more.

Here's where the emotion part comes in. You are angry and disappointed that Barr hasn't done what you want him to do in those cases and any other matters you could possibly name. That anger leads you to make the leap that he will NEVER prosecute other crimes, despite contrary evidence.

If you had been paying attention to Barr's statements, interviews, and actions, you wouldn't be making the emotional argument that he will NEVER prosecute in other matters.

Take the emotion out of it and review all Barr statements. The internet is a vast resource. You can do it.

And this goes for all the other emotional thinkers out here beyond the trees. You know who you are.

Good day, sir.

[precisionshootist]

"If you had been paying attention to Barr's statements, interviews, and actions, you wouldn't be making the emotional argument that he will NEVER prosecute in other matters."

I have studied politics very closely for decades and have made predictions in recent years about Darrell Issa, Trey Gowdy, Jeff Sessions, Jessie Ventura and many others. So now you try to claim I'm not paying attention or am not following the issues rather than give some specific examples of evidence I'm wrong. I can only conclude you don't have any.

I hope I am wrong this time but unfortunately given the "what you see is what you get" nature of politics, that is unlikely.

Lastly, I'm in some pretty good company with many many conservatives that share my same opinion, many are well known political hosts and activists. Remember, politics is a WYSIWYG arena. It's never 3d chess, it's not even checkers. Politics is more like tic tac toe but without all the complicated strategy. So ask yourself, what do you see that Barr is actually doing to indicate an indictment is eminent? The answer of course is nothing.

[bagster]

So now you try to claim I'm not paying attention or am not following the issues...

If you haven't seen or heard what Barr's been saying with regard to investigations and 'accountability' and criminal charges, then you haven't been paying attention.

Perhaps its because you see this as a game of tic-tac-toe rather than the chess game that it is.

Its very easy to think that, because nothing HAS happened, nothing WILL happen, but that's the thinking of a tic-tac-toe guy, and a small child.

I invite you to research Barr's statements and interviews. And actually listen to the words. And think.

Lastly, I'm in some pretty good company with many many conservatives that share my same opinion...

While conservatives are miles smarter than others simply because they are conservatives, there are plenty of conservatives that are dumb sheep and listen to what others say rather than to think for themselves.

Thought is not a democracy, nor should it be 'group-think'. Thought belongs to the individual. Make it so.

In order to do that, you must go back and research what Barr has said, combine it with what Trump has said, and look at what you actually KNOW about the facts and investigations underway.

I can't do it for you, there's too much. And the only way you will learn and understand is to seek out things for yourself.

And stop forming your opinion based on the opinion of others.

There will be indictments. There will be arrests. There will be justice.

This, I can assure you.