[precisionshootist]

“ You are writing out of pure emotion. If you use logic and reason, you will discover that what you said is very dumb.”.

You are projecting a bit. You are the one writing out of emotion. My post is based in logic and fact. I gave just two examples of evidence Barr is not going to prosecute obama criminals but I could give many many more. I asked what makes you think otherwise and you have no response other than to claim my post is dumb so it looks like you can’t point to any tangible fact that indicates we will see indictments.

[bagster]

You are projecting a bit. You are the one writing out of emotion.

See, "I know you are, but what am I?" is not an argument.

I gave just two examples of evidence Barr is not going to prosecute obama criminals but I could give many many more.

Here's where the emotion part comes in. You are angry and disappointed that Barr hasn't done what you want him to do in those cases and any other matters you could possibly name. That anger leads you to make the leap that he will NEVER prosecute other crimes, despite contrary evidence.

If you had been paying attention to Barr's statements, interviews, and actions, you wouldn't be making the emotional argument that he will NEVER prosecute in other matters.

Take the emotion out of it and review all Barr statements. The internet is a vast resource. You can do it.

And this goes for all the other emotional thinkers out here beyond the trees. You know who you are.

Good day, sir.