Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real target of the US assassination of Iranian military leader Qassem Soleimani – China
South China Morning Post ^ | Published: 3:00am, 8 Jan, 2020 Updated: 12:44pm, 14 Jan, 2020 | Ann Lee

Posted on 01/15/2020 7:15:29 AM PST by Zhang Fei

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Zhang Fei

Figures the author is a professor. Completely divorced from reality and lives in her own head creating speculative paranoid fantasies


21 posted on 01/15/2020 8:32:33 AM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
Andrew Yang's crazy ChiCom advisor. Were Yang's parent 外省?

She was featured on Bloomberg TV giving her opinion on the Phase 1 trade deal. She grudgingly admitted, in the face of leading questions pushing her to be critical of Trump, that the deal basically gave Trump everything he wanted. The really constipated nature of her replies led me to look her up on Google. That's how I dug up this editorial. I don't call many people fifth columnists, but this gal is a fifth columnist.

22 posted on 01/15/2020 8:34:21 AM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Wow, these people are as crazy and paranoid as Democrats.


23 posted on 01/15/2020 8:35:59 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

[Wow, these people are as crazy and paranoid as Democrats.]


They’re not crazy and paranoid - they’re pathological liars and narcissists.


24 posted on 01/15/2020 8:38:39 AM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

“Then the CIA convinced the Uyghurs to remove their own organs and dishonestly blame the fair and noble Chinese government in a shameless propaganda ploy!”


25 posted on 01/15/2020 9:04:29 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
Interesting piece, and thanks for posting. Beyond the seemingly superficial observation that the "real" target of the attack was the fellow who ended up spewing body parts all over the road, I have to echo the others in suspecting this reveals more about Chinese attitudes than it does about the U.S. China is energy hungry, a function of industrial expansion that placed speed on a premium over efficiency. This appears to be a normal feature of that sort of expansion - the United States certainly went through it, but that was covered by a pair of world wars with a slough of post-war derelict factories as evidence that we were not immune. Nor were we immune from the sort of energy imperialism that followed as the oil crises of the 70's attest. China is now being threatened by a major vendor, Iran, becoming an exporter of revolution as well as oil. This should, ceteris paribus, allow the Chinese both a carrot and a stick in that relationship, but the carrot only exists insofar as the Chinese can say "no" to Iranian oil, which they find difficult and the Iranians know it. So do the Russians and the Europeans and the Americans, who are not only economic rivals but have become rival suppliers of energy to one degree or other.

Curbing Iran's revolutionary impulses is not a threat to the Chinese apart from that. I suggest it were well the Chinese take the presence of two rogue nuclear states on their borders a little more seriously than they appear to be doing. "They wouldn't dare attack" is one of the silliest tropes in all of history, nearly always paid for in blood.

The US has been actively trying to provoke China into a military confrontation since 2013 under the Obama administration by suddenly turning the South China and East China seas into hotspots after decades of peace in the region.

That is simply silly. What changed during that period is the growth of Chinese expansionism especially with regard (but not restricted) to the Spratly Islands, and the inception of a Chinese navy with force projection capabilities. And yes, oil and not the veneer of "fishing rights" is at the root of it. The United States has had open sea lines of communication as a cornerstone of its foreign policy since the Jefferson administration - nothing new there. Should the author wish for a less myopic view of this situation she would do well to consult the Filipinos and the Vietnamese, both of whose governments have apparently rediscovered the attraction of U.S. Naval presence as a result. Her aggressor is in her mirror.

26 posted on 01/15/2020 9:31:46 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Interesting read. People and countries tend to think “it’s all about them.” Sometimes it is. But more often, they are projecting motives to other people assuming that other countries actions are directed at causing them the harm that resulted from the acts when the harm was an unintended consequence.

I’m certain we intend to keep China within its boundaries. But I don’t think recent events in Iran have much to do with that, unless the author’s real subtext is that we have prevented China from expanding by way of Iran.


27 posted on 01/15/2020 9:36:03 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

28 posted on 01/15/2020 9:44:41 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

“NYU professor provides the bizarro view from China.”

Adjunct professor, not a real professor.

That means she pays NYU to be a professor there, not the other way around.

Total United Front.

https://professorannlee.com


29 posted on 01/15/2020 12:52:21 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

[Adjunct professor, not a real professor.]


Non-tenure track for sure, but no one works for free. My guess is either she wouldn’t lower herself to go for a tenure track position at a state university or she’s teaching while keeping an eye open for a position on Wall Street, which is tougher to do when you’re teaching in Kansas.


30 posted on 01/15/2020 1:01:48 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

No.

She brings in money to NYU. They let her be faculty.

Someone else pays her. ChiCom United Front entities I assume.

Look at the whole name of her web site. Professorannlee.

Playing up the professor part, as if that confers authority.

She really is a ChiCom grifter. Look at her articles, such as, The US Should Want Xi Jinping to be President for Life.

Sad thing is, most of the “experts” are swamp creatures as bad as she is.


31 posted on 01/15/2020 1:07:42 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

[She brings in money to NYU. They let her be faculty.

Someone else pays her. ChiCom United Front entities I assume.]


This is my understanding of the adjunct tag:

“Adjunct Professor, Clinical Professor, Professor of Practice, Research Professor. The first three apply to people who have outside activities such as medical practice, professional engineer, lawyer and do not work full-time in a research capacity.”

While it’s possible (and maybe even likely) that she is being paid by the Chinese government for services rendered, I’d being surprised if that government were paying NYU to have her teach some courses. It’s not a good look and could endanger NYU’s federal funding.


32 posted on 01/15/2020 1:29:34 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Nothing would be direct.


33 posted on 01/15/2020 2:46:13 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

[Nothing would be direct.]


You might well be right. I expect they’ve learned a lot from the Johnny Chung incident in the 1990’s. And the GOP never impeached Clinton over it. Maybe it should have.


34 posted on 01/15/2020 2:50:33 PM PST by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
In the case of China, Uygur groups from the Muslim minority in China’s northwest, were armed with military weapons by outside forces. Uygur separatists proceeded to terrorise parts of Western China with bombings, stabbings and other violent means...
Thanks Zhang Fei. That's an interesting, xenophobic, paranoid take on the hegemonic pyramid model that she's pushin' there.

35 posted on 01/16/2020 8:01:49 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson