Skip to comments.Horowitz Report Live Thread
Posted on 12/09/2019 6:08:59 AM PST by janetjanet998
click here to read article
You only half disputed what I said, while calling it incorrect.
“They have concluded that it was proper and done correctly. They CONCLUDED he followed procedures.”
They concluded that it was done correctly, administratively - which is what I said. The impropriety is all over the report, though the IG declines to assign or assert cause for that.
I worked for the government (Military) for 32 years. I was called in as a special witness on accident investigations. My reports had to be completely honest and put blame where blame was due-REGARDLESS of who they were. If you can sit here and say this report does that TO EVERYONE-then good for you. If you cant-then thats a whitewash.
Because in the world I come from I was witness to reports where the blame didnt go to the leadership who really screwed the pooch. Instead it was the middle rank field grades and senior NCOs that might get thrown under the bus.
Thats what this report is-and Comey (aka Cor-ney) out there flapping his gums is living proof of that.
If you think this IG report was done on the up and up-and that they didnt try to use technical jargon to let the big guys look innocent
So yet again, you are angrily agreeing with me.
I don’t know. I can only guess that if you knew the exact date you might be able to look it up on a docket somewhere and deduce which judge approved which warrant, and they probably want to keep that confidential.
I didn't say there was no political bias - I said it says those at the TOP had no political bias - and that is clearly what it says...and that is what I said to the original poster and that is why I said that is not a punt.
And as I pointed out very clearly - If they didn't find evidence in testimony - it is because they did not look...they did not ask.
It is not a punt when they say opening the investigation was proper - because we know it was not. That statement stands on its merits alone - regardless of any testimony or other evidence.
Have a good day.
Anyone know what time the Horowitz hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee starts tomorrow morning? (Wednesday, December 11)
CSPN 2 covers the senate. You might check the cspan.org web site.
Sorry that’s all I got
Horowitz will never be taken seriously,(by those who matter).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.