Horowitz Report Live Thread

IG ^

[janetjanet998]

I am not sure of the time of the release..it is 9 am now....there was some talk last night on twitter that there will be a short press conference in the morning but the report won't be made public until the afternoon....but take that info with a grain of salt

[lepton]

You only half disputed what I said, while calling it incorrect.

“They have concluded that it was proper and done correctly. They CONCLUDED he followed procedures.”

They concluded that it was done correctly, administratively - which is what I said. The impropriety is all over the report, though the IG declines to assign or assert cause for that.

[NELSON111]

If you think this IG report was done on the up and up-and that they didn’t try to use technical jargon to let the big guys look innocent-and they they didn’t give some meat to the GOP while providing cover for others - go right ahead.

I worked for the government (Military) for 32 years. I was called in as a special witness on accident investigations. My reports had to be completely honest and put blame where blame was due-REGARDLESS of who they were. If you can sit here and say this report does that TO EVERYONE-then good for you. If you can’t-then that’s a whitewash.

Because in the world I come from I was witness to reports where the blame didn’t go to the leadership who really screwed the pooch. Instead it was the middle rank field grades and senior NCOs that might get thrown under the bus.

That’s what this report is-and Comey (aka “Cor-ney”) out there flapping his gums is living proof of that.

[lepton]

If you think this IG report was done on the up and up-and that they didn’t try to use technical jargon to let the big guys look innocent

---

My point was exactly that: that the comments were technical jargon that don’t mean what people think they mean. The media and people like Comey are making vigorous use of that.

So yet again, you are angrily agreeing with me.

[Boogieman]

I don’t know. I can only guess that if you knew the exact date you might be able to look it up on a docket somewhere and deduce which judge approved which warrant, and they probably want to keep that confidential.

[NELSON111]

Look - the point of my original post (to someone else) was that they said it was a punt. I said it's not a punt when they say those at the top had no political bias. The report says that. You disagreed with that.

I didn't say there was no political bias - I said it says those at the TOP had no political bias - and that is clearly what it says...and that is what I said to the original poster and that is why I said that is not a punt.

And as I pointed out very clearly - If they didn't find evidence in testimony - it is because they did not look...they did not ask.

It is not a punt when they say opening the investigation was proper - because we know it was not. That statement stands on its merits alone - regardless of any testimony or other evidence.

Have a good day.

[Brown Deer]

STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF CHRISTOPHER STEELE AND ORBIS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE IN RESPONSE TO THE DOJ OIG REPORT INTO THE CROSSFIRE HURRICANE INVESTIGATION

[nutmeg]

Anyone know what time the Horowitz hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee starts tomorrow morning? (Wednesday, December 11)

[olesigh]

CSPN 2 covers the senate. You might check the cspan.org web site.

Sorry that’s all I got

[boomop1]

Horowitz will never be taken seriously,(by those who matter).