Thus, you can avoid a rape charge if you claim you didn't think it was wrong...
Laz will find this interesting....
1 posted on
10/04/2019 7:53:29 PM PDT by
jonascord
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: jonascord
Can he pursue a smoke afterwards?
2 posted on
10/04/2019 7:57:37 PM PDT by
fruser1
To: jonascord
What is this judge wearing under her robe? A smile?
3 posted on
10/04/2019 7:57:55 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame.)
To: jonascord
lol
How would they go about stopping him from pursuing sex?
If the woman was in agreement?
Lock him up for life would be the only way.
4 posted on
10/04/2019 7:59:42 PM PDT by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
To: jonascord
Wouldn’t it make more.sense to.castrate.him?
5 posted on
10/04/2019 8:00:53 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
To: jonascord
A woman who is raped by someone like him,will also have a right to protect herself to the point of killing her attacker. Then, what will the judge say?
7 posted on
10/04/2019 8:05:09 PM PDT by
adorno
To: jonascord
There is a RIGHT TO SEX????
8 posted on
10/04/2019 8:09:08 PM PDT by
Chickensoup
(Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
To: jonascord
Sure sounds like another win for is-salami.
9 posted on
10/04/2019 8:09:11 PM PDT by
Sirius Lee
(They are openly stating that they intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live.)
To: jonascord
In the favor of the one individual this judge has basically removed the rights of others.
10 posted on
10/04/2019 8:16:06 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
("Democratic" party sold out to the ICP. It is now the Communist Party USA.)
To: jonascord
Whenever I think things are bad here, I read about another insane British court decision.
To: jonascord
I prefer the Steve Martin technique
Two words in the English language...I forgot. I forgot armed robbery was illegal.
17 posted on
10/04/2019 8:33:09 PM PDT by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: jonascord
What happens when someone who doesn’t understand consent runs into someone who doesn’t comprehend the rules of deadly force?
To: jonascord
So who does he have a fundamental right to have sex with?
19 posted on
10/04/2019 8:39:04 PM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation has ended!)
To: jonascord
This sounds just like caveman days.
To: jonascord
Whoopi’s Goldberg will interview this judge next week.
25 posted on
10/04/2019 8:55:20 PM PDT by
ptsal
To: jonascord
hell Germany already let some goathumper off for raping a young boy cause he dint know it was wrong...
castrate these mutts
26 posted on
10/04/2019 8:55:50 PM PDT by
Chode
(Send bachelors, and come heavily armed!)
To: jonascord
This ruling goes completely contradicts the legal reasoning underpinning statutory rape laws.
27 posted on
10/04/2019 8:58:58 PM PDT by
Dr. Sivana
(Sutor, ne ultra crepidam--Appelles of Kos)
To: jonascord
And I have the right to defend myself against anyone that doesn’t understand my right to say NO!
29 posted on
10/04/2019 9:10:30 PM PDT by
notpoliticallycorewrecked
(Will the last responsible person leaving California, please turn out the lights.)
To: jonascord
so if i don’t understand finances, can i legally pursue bank robberies? Home invasions? Grand theft Auto? Petty Larceny?
34 posted on
10/04/2019 10:00:49 PM PDT by
Bob434
To: jonascord
He should be locked up in an insane asylum, in a locked room, where he cannot hurt anyone.
The “doctor” who concluded that it was OK to let him loose in society, because if he doesn’t understand “no”, he can ignore it, should be locked up in an asylum too, he is a danger to society, letting dangerous, crazy people run around loose.
To: jonascord
Bill Clinton will find this “more interesting”.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson