Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Says Congress Should Pass New Laws So Sitting Presidents Can Be Indicted
NPR ^ | September 20, 2019 | Susan davis

Posted on 09/20/2019 2:23:24 PM PDT by mplc51

In an exclusive interview with NPR, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she has not changed her mind on pursuing impeachment but is ready to change the law to restrain presidential power and make it clear that a sitting president can, in fact, be indicted.

"I do think that we will have to pass some laws that will have clarity for future presidents. [A] president should be indicted, if he's committed a wrongdoing — any president. There is nothing anyplace that says the president should not be indicted," Pelosi told All Things Considered host Ari Shapiro and NPR congressional correspondent Susan Davis on Friday. "That's something cooked up by the president's lawyers. That's what that is. But so that people will feel 'OK, well, if he — if he does something wrong, [he] should be able to be indicted.' "

The California Democrat said that while it is Justice Department protocol not to pursue any charges against an incumbent — the reason former special counsel Robert Mueller said he couldn't charge President Trump with a crime no matter the outcome of his report — that should be changed.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: communism; doj; dueprocess; impeachment; liberalagenda; nancypelosi; peach45; peachfotyfi; pelosi; sittingpresident; socialism; tds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2019 2:23:24 PM PDT by mplc51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Saying something like this takes a special kind of stupid.


2 posted on 09/20/2019 2:25:40 PM PDT by thesharkboy (Charter member of the Basket of Deplorables)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Right. And the bitch will try to repeal it just as soon as a Democrat wins an election.


3 posted on 09/20/2019 2:26:00 PM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

No thanks, dummy.


4 posted on 09/20/2019 2:26:07 PM PDT by chris37 (Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Good idea Smellosi! Just 25 years too late.


5 posted on 09/20/2019 2:26:17 PM PDT by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

This coming from a woman who was caught back in 2011 trading on insider information.


6 posted on 09/20/2019 2:26:20 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary walks free, equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

So this must mean that it would have been good to have had something like this during the Obama years?


7 posted on 09/20/2019 2:26:31 PM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

This retromingent senile virago really needs to retire. She has done enough damage to America.


8 posted on 09/20/2019 2:27:13 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Back in your cubicle auntie Nan.


9 posted on 09/20/2019 2:27:51 PM PDT by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

These people have done nothing but go after trump since Jan 2019. Really since Jan 2017

Which is good, because they are dangerous in their illogic and insanity. Still, I hope people realize how worthless they are.


10 posted on 09/20/2019 2:28:18 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

“if he’s committed a wrongdoing — any president.”

You mean something like having a Government employee perform oral sex on you while on the clock?

No, that’s right, you said that was none of our business.


11 posted on 09/20/2019 2:29:32 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Insider trading is legal for members of Congress, I believe.

MA Senator wrote a bill making it illegal. It was passed, then soon after, quietly repealed.


12 posted on 09/20/2019 2:29:54 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

If Congress passes a law, doesn’t the President have to sign it?


13 posted on 09/20/2019 2:31:41 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (A man's greatest strength is his greatest weakness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

President Trump really drives these reprobates nuts. It is fun to watch. I hope a few of them start stroking out soon.


14 posted on 09/20/2019 2:32:54 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

Pelosi IS a special kind of stupid.


15 posted on 09/20/2019 2:34:00 PM PDT by rockinqsranch ("Democratic" party sold out to the ICP. It is now the Communist Party USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy

....for NOT committing any crime....

Mi$$ America forgot to add that bit to her comments.

Fixed it.


16 posted on 09/20/2019 2:34:24 PM PDT by pacificus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Our forefathers were a bit wiser and created the impeachment process to make it difficult to remove a president using a kangaroo court.


17 posted on 09/20/2019 2:36:29 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

There’s that Constitution thing that mentions impeachment for sitting Presidents, but of course Democrats don’t pay attention to the Constitution anyway. If you allow sitting Presidents to be indicted, then any Federal prosecutor anywhere in the country could empanel a grand jury and get an indictment. It would be impossible to govern.


18 posted on 09/20/2019 2:37:03 PM PDT by Stevenc131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

There are a couple of problems with your idea, Nan.

What President is going to sign such a bill? Even a saintly Democrat President would be reluctant to put that kind of power in someone else’s hands. Overriding a Presidential veto would only make things worse.

Then there’s the whole “who is the government’s chief law enforcement official” why it’s the President. Is he supposed to prosecute himself, or will this be a new power that the Legislative branch will acquire over the Executive?


19 posted on 09/20/2019 2:38:35 PM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplc51

Being impeached and being indicted are the same thing.
She really is that senile.


20 posted on 09/20/2019 2:41:02 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Chivalry is not dead. It is a warriors code and only practiced by warriors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson