Magnanimity, Thy Name Is Tlaib-A prejudice exposed cannot be ignored.

Commentary ^ | May 14, 2019 | John Podhoretz

[SJackson]

I think she was trying to be nice. Or, if not nice, magnanimous—or what she believed to be magnanimous.

The problem with what Rep. Rashida Tlaib said over the weekend about Jews and Palestinians is precisely this—precisely that she meant to be nice. Her attempt at magnanimity was, in essence, to say this: “given what Jews went through, I feel less enraged and, indeed, even a little ‘calmed’ when I think of the evil they did to my people—my people, who welcomed and helped them!”

This is why Congressional Democrats and figures in pop culture have come to her defense and say that Republicans need to apologize to her. They believe it is exculpatory that she intended to be nice. But she can’t be. Her essential view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is distorted and wrong and mendacious.

I could go into detail about how the Arabs of Palestine did not, in fact, welcome the Jews who relocated there. I could expound on the fact that the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was literally allied with Hitler. I could explain that the Arabs of Palestine had no authority to welcome or fail to welcome Jews since the territory was under the control of the Ottoman Empire and then the British. And I could lay out the facts about how the Jews of Palestine accepted the U.N. partition plan of 1947 that would have given them a state and the Arabs of Palestine a state—but that the Arabs of Palestine rejected the idea and allied with the Arab countries and principalities across the region in an attempt to snuff out the nascent Israel aborning. But I won’t; others have done it and others will continue to do it.

I’ll just say this. When you say, “When I think about it, your mass murder and land expropriation were the result of how you came from a very dark place so when I think on it, at least I can be comforted by that fact and how wonderful my people were to have been so open to you,” you are only being magnanimous in the sense that you are grandiloquently patting someone you have just called evil on the head and saying, “nice boy.”

Have we fallen so far that people are to be praised for merely acknowledging the fact of the Holocaust? White supremacists often cite Jewish business acumen when they discuss the threat Jews pose to the world. Are we to thank them for their generosity?

Are we supposed to overlook the essential meaning of what people say when they intend to be nice? The whole point of what happened here with Rashida Tlaib is this: She has no idea how to say something about Jews and Israel that isn’t vile, even when she tries really, really hard.

So yes, probably she was trying to be nice.

So the hell what?

[SJackson]

Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

From the right. And from the left.

Related threads

Rashida Tlaib Has Her History Wrong

[samtheman]

I could go into detail about how the Arabs of Palestine did not, in fact, welcome the Jews who relocated there. I could expound on the fact that the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem was literally allied with Hitler. I could explain that the Arabs of Palestine had no authority to welcome or fail to welcome Jews since the territory was under the control of the Ottoman Empire and then the British. And I could lay out the facts about how the Jews of Palestine accepted the U.N. partition plan of 1947 that would have given them a state and the Arabs of Palestine a state—but that the Arabs of Palestine rejected the idea and allied with the Arab countries and principalities across the region in an attempt to snuff out the nascent Israel aborning. But I won’t; others have done it and others will continue to do it.
—
Well, you should have gone into detail about those things because those ARE the essentials of the story and vastly out-weigh the silly point about patting somebody on the head that you go on to make. Liberals and muzzies have the history all wrong and that needs to be repeated over and over. We don’t need any extra cleverosities. Just the facts. Nothing but the facts.

[A strike]

agreed