Posted on 10/27/2018 2:03:37 PM PDT by Kaslin
With all the drama flooding the news cycle over the past week, this story could have easily flown under the radar. One of the names most commonly mentioned as a possible 2020 Democratic nominee is New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand. She’s currently engaged in a re-election bid, however, and she participated in a debate against her Republican opponent Chele Farley on Thursday night. During the questioning, one of the moderators asked Gillibrand why she was sitting on so much campaign cash (in excess of $10M) and if that meant she was plotting a POTUS run. In fact, the question was asked twice in the most direct fashion possible. In what came as a rather shocking answer (at least to me), Gillibrand flatly stated that if she won another term she would serve the full six years in the upper chamber. (Free Beacon)
“Senator Gillibrand, you have not spent a lot of money in this reelection campaign for U.S. Senate. In fact, you have millions of dollars in your campaign coffers. Many, including your opponent, say you are saving that money to gear up for a presidential run in 2020. Can you tell New Yorkers, who plan to vote for you on November 6, that you will, if reelected, serve out your six-year Senate term?” the debate moderator asked.
Gillibrand responded, “I will.” She then started talking about how she has hosted 16 town halls and visited 60 counties, adding that she cares about reaching out to her constituents because wants to represent them.
“Just want to make this clear, you’re saying that you will not get out of the race and you will not run for president? You will serve your six years?” the moderator asked.
“I will serve my six-year term,” Gillibrand responded.
There you have it. Normally we hear candidates dancing around the question, saying that they “have no plans” at this time or that they are “focusing on their current election.” Gillibrand didn’t do that. She said the words. “I will serve my six-year term.”
Of course, stories about politicians lying or going back on their word later rank right up there with dog-bites-man reports. Having that clip lingering in the background wouldn’t be helpful in a primary bid, however, and the anticipated, highly crowded Democratic field would no doubt jump all over it.
But perhaps, in this case, she’s telling the truth. Gillibrand may indeed have read the tea leaves and decided already that 2020 wasn’t her time. First, as I just mentioned, she would be facing a large field full of some heavy hitters with plenty of national name recognition. If Gillibrand is confident that Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris are all running she might not bring enough to the table to make it through the first round. Also, she no doubt saw that CNN poll from a couple of weeks ago which showed Biden with a massive lead and had her rattling around somewhere near the bottom in single digits.
But Gillibrand would be a problematic primary candidate anyway. Those who aren’t familiar with her early career in New York politics may not be aware of it, but she’s got some history to overcome if she wants to win over the far left progressive base. When she was in Congress representing the 20th District, she wasn’t just a moderate. She was frequently labeled a “conservative Democrat.” On the campaign trail, she railed against amnesty for illegal aliens, vowed to get spending in Washington under control and swore to protect the Second Amendment rights of her constituents.
In 2009 when she was appointed to fill Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat, the Daily Beast called Gillibrand, “a bizarro version of Sarah Palin.” Maureen Dowd described her as, “an N.R.A. handmaiden in Bobby Kennedy’s old seat.” A search of the old archives of local media outlets in New York from that period turns up plenty more quotes of that nature.
None of those things would particularly harm Gillibrand in a general election bid against Trump because she would need to at least attempt to run to the center. But she’d have to get through the primary first and her potential Democratic opponents no doubt already have folders full of those clippings ready to unleash during the debates. Gillibrand has done a complete about-face since taking her seat in the Senate, molding herself into the most liberal figure imaginable on every issue across the board, completely contradicting the things she claimed to stand for when she was in serving in the House. She’s a complete opportunist in that regard, but then again, she’s a politician. But all of that material is still out there waiting to be resurrected, and perhaps she’s giving up on her presidential aspirations because she’s knows those quotes are out there, waiting to come back and bite her.
She didn’t receive a fake bomb, so clearly, she’s outside the innermost circle of influence and power.
I’m hoping, and praying desperately, that she’s out for 2018.
Her, cuomo, Stirpe, and a host of other corrupt NY politicians.
The 2020 election picture will become clearer when the fat lady in the pantsuit and tablecloths sings her aria.
If she got the Democrats’ nomination, we would have the second consecutive Presidential election with both major parties running a New Yorker for President. How would the rest of the country feel about that?
She’s a Democrat, correct? Her lips were moving, correct?
She’s a Democrat, and this guy believed her!?
IOW, she lied.
Will “Don’t Cry For Me Argentina” count in place of an aria. She is the fat lady, though. Or fat gender choosing living being. Or, well, she’s fat.
That is a nice political calculation. If Pres. Trump gets a House and Senate he can work with, he is probably a shoo-in for a second term. Waiting until he is out of office to run is smart.
If memory serves, George W. Bush ran for re-election as governor of Texas promising he would fill out his term. When a politician says that they aren’t looking at higher office, they’re looking for higher office.
No one wants to run against Trump in 2020. How are they going to get back the Rust belt states?
A lot of dems are against her because they blame her for Franken quitting. She may be waiting to see if that blows over.
“we would have the second consecutive Presidential election with both major parties running a New Yorker for President.”
Who was the first? I must have missed that part.
Can she run for office from a mental hospital room? The people helping her are so nice there.
A visitor believes she is an offspring of Native Americans and does a colorful whooping wardance. Another woman wears a tablecloth around her body and believes she really is the true President of the United States. She keeps falling over.
She thinks these two women have problems.
How’s “Don’t cry for me, Chappaqua?”
“I will serve my six-year term,” Gillibrand responded.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
She is not lying. She could run for President but will be pounded into the dirt just like anyone else who takes on Trump. She will still be able to keep her Senator job after she gets her ass kicked..
Remember, Dems don’t take kindly to too much competition.
In words Fauxchontas understands, she be “low man on totem pole” this time around.
Recent pictures I have seen are considerably more chubby. Just like her head.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.