does sessions need video and signed confessions of these traitors before he'll do something???
Posted on 09/04/2018 6:25:22 PM PDT by bitt
Republican Congress members who questioned Bruce Ohr behind closed doors Tuesday learned the former top Justice Department official had regular contact in 2016 with Andrew Weissmann – who is now Robert Mueller’s top deputy – regarding the dubious, anti-Trump dossier of unverified claims that became a major premise for launching the special counsel investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Isn’t this story at least a week old? Not sure it deserves breaking news treatment.
does sessions need video and signed confessions of these traitors before he'll do something???
Sara Carter on Hannity tonight says the redacted 20 pages of the FISA will be released ‘in days’.. (Q says so too..)
I am sure this had been duly noted by the Trump legal team.
“Why has Trump agreed to give written answers to Mueller’s questions?”
According to Jay Sekulo who was on Hannity tonight that has not been agreed to. However talks are continuing.
This could work out; it shows Trump's willingness to cooperate with Spec Counsel, while permitting him to claim executive privilege on Presidential decisions. Mueller has no authority to force the issue... The result could be a demand that Mueller wrap up his costly investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. If the SC does not comply, then after the midterm elections, POTUS fires him.
If the SC and the Dims scream then POTUS has the authority to force Mueller to reveal what he has, AND to reveal it himself if Mueller refuses to comply. Altogether different than Watergate - which might also have fallen apart if the GOP ever had the guts to fight.
i n c e s t u o u s
“Why has Trump agreed to give written answers to Mueller’s questions?”
Maybe it’s because his lawyers have not been successful in talking him out of it? Trump might think he can swagger in and talk his way out of this. Not a good idea.
And it surely isn’t stunning unless the reader has been living under a rock for the last year.
Don’t worry. I got an advance copy of his answers to the 44 questions:
Answer to Question 1: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 2: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 3: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 4: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 5: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 6: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 7: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 8: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 9: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 10: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 11: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 12: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 13: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 14: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 15: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 16: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 17: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 18: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 19: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 20: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 21: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 22: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 23: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 24: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 25: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 26: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 27: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 28: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 29: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 30: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 31: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 32: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 33: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 34: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 35: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 36: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 37: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 38: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 39: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 40: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 41: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 42: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 43: GO POUND SAND.
Answer to Question 44: GO POUND SAND.
(in my dreams, at least!)
I don’t recall. I think that worked out fine for Hillary.
Are we surprised?
I see you've been active on the Q threads, which I haven't gotten into [memories of quidam...].
Good to see you're still in the fight. 
Weissmann: often overturned, 0-9 before Supreme Court.
His value lies in areas other than following the law with rectitude.
I got a better question. Why isn’t Weisman in jail?
-PJ
Ah. Should always trust my OWN questioning, eh?
Weissman’s also highly dubious, so that makes sense.
See, even Michael Savage can be right some of the time. When he makes “baah,basaaaaaaaah” sheep impersonations of us Trump fans and says “I don’t need to do these shows, I don’t have to talk about what you, the audience wants to hear every night”, then I turn it off.
You know they used RICO against people trying to stop abortionists. Then they said its was natural to do. Now they’ll say spare Mueller. Hypocrites.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.