Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dem Sen Murphy: ‘I’m For’ a Ban on Semi-Automatic Rifles
Breitbart ^ | 3 Oct 2017 | Ian Hanchett

Posted on 10/03/2017 3:40:26 PM PDT by Cheerio

On Tuesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) said he is for a ban on semi-automatic rifles.

Co-host Willie Geist asked, “How could this have been prevented? Is there a law? Congressman Himes ultimately said yes, he’d be for a ban on semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15. How about you?”

Murphy answered, “Absolutely. Let’s just be clear that the pace of these epic mass shootings, 10 or more people being killed, doubled after the Assault Weapons Ban expired. That’s not a coincidence. I think we also have to look at these aftermarket modifications that [allow] you, fairly easily, to turn an automatic weapon — turn a semi-automatic weapon into an automatic weapon. … We have to get back to the evergreen changes, things like universal background checks, that frankly, probably would have stopped many of the other murders around the country that happened on Sunday before the shooting started in Las Vegas.”

Geist followed up, “So, just to be specific, ban bump stocks and ban semi-automatic rifles. Are you for those two things?”

Murphy answered, “I’m for both of those two things.”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; congress; dems; guns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: Cheerio

Ryan announced that the hearing protection act is dead. Surprise, surprise, surprise.


21 posted on 10/03/2017 3:52:20 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

How often does it have to be said; the nut case in Vegas did NOT SNIPE any body, he sprayed and prayed.
Put enough ordinance down range, and your going to hit something.


22 posted on 10/03/2017 3:53:25 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I’m for a ban on liberals!


23 posted on 10/03/2017 3:57:58 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

My first thought.

You have to realize that to every Leftist, a semi-automatic is the same thing as fully auto.


24 posted on 10/03/2017 3:58:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I’d love to see a poll taken of law biding gun owners to see how many would turn in their weapons if they were directed to.


25 posted on 10/03/2017 3:59:42 PM PDT by hillarys cankles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

26 posted on 10/03/2017 4:02:11 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Maybe this idiot doesn’t know that murder is already illegal?


27 posted on 10/03/2017 4:08:19 PM PDT by Hugh the Scot ("The days of being a keyboard commando are over. It's time to get some bloody knuckles." -Drew68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

And the ban on crack, cocaine, heroin, etc. has successfully and completely stopped these drugs from getting on the street?


28 posted on 10/03/2017 4:08:29 PM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Dumb Democrat as usual. No brains. No common sense.


29 posted on 10/03/2017 4:12:02 PM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg
By the way, I heard a poll cited on the news that showed that the majority of Americans support background checks on gun purchases. I wonder, this time around, if any of the the 2nd Amendment supporters on the TV panels will ever get around to informing the discussion that we already have background checks, when their opponents jack them up for “opposing” background checks. Heretofore, they refuse to reveal that. I have never been able to figure that one out.

Hmm, perhaps we should discuss background checks for candidates (and office holders) for POTUS, VPOTUS, Congress, and "news" peeps.

30 posted on 10/03/2017 4:17:45 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

Shooting over a road/street is already a State felony in most states.

THEY ALWAYS WANT ONE MORE LAW.


31 posted on 10/03/2017 4:18:05 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (This time I am Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

The Demoncrats know if we disarm the population, get control of healthcare, and shut down the first amendment, we will be in power forever.


32 posted on 10/03/2017 4:18:23 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Congressman Himes ultimately said yes, he’d be for a ban on semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15. How about you?”...the shooter broke the law fifty-nine and probably eventually more times each time he killed someone - for sure a law saying he can't have a semi-automatic - or that latest rage, modify one to make it continuous fire - is going to stop him......
33 posted on 10/03/2017 4:25:20 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

They propose one law and I say counter w/ the repeal of EVERY other (illegal, unconstitutional) ‘gun control’ law on the books, for it seems it hasn’t done anything already...why keep ‘em?


34 posted on 10/03/2017 4:37:54 PM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
I’m all for a Ban on Chris Murphy, Semi-Idiot and Traitor.

What do you have against semis?

Personally, I'm for a ban on ALL GUNS.

ALL GUNS within 1/2 mile of Chris Murphy.

No cop guns.
No security.
No FBI or Secret Service

Nothing

35 posted on 10/03/2017 4:38:28 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life, Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I’m for a ban on “Senator” Murphy. We’ve got to get the dummies off The Hill. They’re “killing us.” “We’re dying here.”


36 posted on 10/03/2017 4:46:20 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The Second Amendment. NOW more than ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
ANY new law is simply going to restrict the LAW-ABIDING folks. Criminals don't give a hoot how many laws these ranting RATS want to put on the books. And No they are never going to achieve their paradise on earth that they believe will be the end result of Socialism/Marxism/Communism
37 posted on 10/03/2017 5:01:49 PM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I’m for a ban on all DEMORATS!


38 posted on 10/03/2017 5:04:30 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

The logic mystifies sense.

A person who will not obey a homicide law somehow will obey a gun control law?

Then in Chicago, they don’t enforce the gun control laws, but ask for more when black kids get shot.

They don’t care, it is just political gain.


39 posted on 10/03/2017 6:03:13 PM PDT by Titus-Maximus (It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“I’m all for a Ban on Chris Murphy, Semi-Idiot and Traitor.”

Of course he’s all for bans....he’s a democrat.


40 posted on 10/03/2017 6:10:42 PM PDT by Bonemaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson