Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tucker Carlson: ‘No Reason to Be Optimistic’ About Trump’s Deal on DACA
Breitbart.com ^ | 14 Sep 2017 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 09/15/2017 8:45:29 AM PDT by Rockitz

For the opening monologue of his Thursday night broadcast of Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” host Tucker Carlson criticized the reported deal President Donald Trump made with House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer over the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration policy.

According to Carlson, this deal would give legal status to 800,000 illegal aliens and Trump would not get any of the things he advocated on immigration during the 2016 presidential campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: trumpdaca; tucker; tuckerdaca
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Tucker is absolutely right. No deal unless we get:

1. Secure the border in a transparently verifiable way;

2. End the anchor-baby interpretation of the 14th Amendment;

3. Enforce e-verify without exception and with severe penalties;

4. End chain migration. Entry per individual qualifications; not family ties.

5. Deportation upon contact with any law enforcement agency- federal, state or local;

6. No government benefits beyond critical emergency care(and that ought to be billed back to the home government)

7. NO "Path to citizenship" EVER for anyone who has entered the us illegally.

Scratch item 7. It looks like Trump has already dumped that one. If this fails it's time to move out of this country with its $20T in debt. There's no f'ing way my kids are going to be enslaved to that and the next $100T that will quickly be tacked on for the rest of their lives.

1 posted on 09/15/2017 8:45:29 AM PDT by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

On #7 you are naïve if you think the Courts are going to allow Trump to pre-empt any path to citizenship. Citing the 14th. Amendment they will never allow such a dual-tiered citizenship arrangement.


2 posted on 09/15/2017 8:50:58 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

What deal are you and Tucker referring to?

I am not aware of any actual deal.


3 posted on 09/15/2017 8:54:56 AM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

I agree with you, but does President Trump?

I have to give Donald Trump credit for making illegal immigration an issue. Many (most?) conservative politicians were not as strong. On the other hand, who knows what Donald Trump will think next on this topic? I wish Ann Coulter were President.


4 posted on 09/15/2017 8:55:10 AM PDT by ChessExpert (NAFTA - Not A Free Trade Agreement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Citizens of other countries who broke into our country deserve no accommodation.
They have been ripping us off for decades.
If we do not hold the line, the rule of law and the country will be lost.

No new laws to benefit those breaking them.

We did that in 1986 and what was supposed to be an amnesty for less than a million became 3.5 million.
Illegal aliens are now 10 times that number.
When they say 11 million, we know it is 30 million or more.
The 800,000 DACA will become 2 million plus and then it will be impossible to remove their parents (who trafficked them across the border), uncles, aunts, cousins, etc.


5 posted on 09/15/2017 8:56:20 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
How about no deal period on this.

Trump's campaign took off when he started talking about border security and stopping illegal immigration. He was the only candidate to do so.

When Fox complained about the wall, Trump said it just got 10 ft higher.

If he abandons this issue, his presidency is over. There will not be a second term and the gop-e will lose both the senate and house.

6 posted on 09/15/2017 8:56:55 AM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Tucker is wrong. There wasn’t a deal.


7 posted on 09/15/2017 8:58:04 AM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

When did we start believing Schumer and Pelosi?


8 posted on 09/15/2017 8:59:53 AM PDT by slumber1 (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Exactly. It’s just 4-chan pol-like speculation, or worrying about what might happen. We’re supposed to be the grownups.

Disappointing to see Carlson joining all the housewives at the fence chattering anxiously about the divorced blonde who just moved into the neighborhood.

An upside is, we’re getting to see the moles flushed here on Free Republic—like coming up on a covey of quail: Whirrrrr!
Or maybe they’re just neurotic.


9 posted on 09/15/2017 9:02:51 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

It’s important that we not be stampeded like cattle.

The uniparty and its media has been attempting that since the day Trump announced, and they aren’t going to stop until it works.


10 posted on 09/15/2017 9:10:51 AM PDT by chris37 (Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
I don't follow you. What does the 14th amendment have to do with someone who entered this country illegally? DACA is about non-citizens, humanoids who were born abroad.
 
11 posted on 09/15/2017 9:13:13 AM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
I'm just hoping we can stop the hemorrhaging. If we can get that kind of deal where we get 1 through 7, it's possible.
12 posted on 09/15/2017 9:15:50 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The RATs will deal for fast-track citizenship. You can count on that. They need the voters.


13 posted on 09/15/2017 9:19:52 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chris37
That's right, mister. Just the facts. Image and video hosting by TinyPic This is the city. It was a cool day in the City of Angels. Ma had written me from the farm where I grew up. She told me old Bossie had died. So I called AP, the NYT, Reuters and all the other usual suspects and told them, "I don't need your bull now."
14 posted on 09/15/2017 9:23:18 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chris37; tumblindice

The pre-deal posturing is well under way on both sides. If you haven’t seen that, you’ve got your heads in the sand.


15 posted on 09/15/2017 9:23:48 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

Trump was truly the only choice. If he doesn’t follow through, my family has other options thankfully.


16 posted on 09/15/2017 9:27:35 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
2. End the anchor-baby interpretation of the 14th Amendment;

This is the most important one... All the other 'agreements' democrats agree to they'll ignore. They'll say 'we don't have the money to enforce 'this or that'...

There's always been laws on the books to protect our borders - but Congress wouldn't enforce those laws. Democrats take the 'goodies' they want (millions of illegals made into citizens) then everything they 'agree to' they ignore.

That's what they did with Reagan, with Bush, with all the Republicans they've played for fools.

And it's what they want to do with Trump...I hate democrats.

17 posted on 09/15/2017 9:30:19 AM PDT by GOPJ ("$3 Million Dollars 'PER DAY' is spent to incarcerate criminal illegals.That's $1.2 Billion a year.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Tucker is right. We are supposed to believe Nancy and Chuckie came running to the White House dinner because Trump said "no deal." And pay no attention to his garbage tweets yesterday.


18 posted on 09/15/2017 9:32:21 AM PDT by proust (Since a politician never believes what he says, he is quite surprised to be taken at his word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert

POLL: Amnesty or Wall – Which do you support?

Read more: http://www.headlineoftheday.com/2017/09/14/poll-amnesty-or-wall-which-do-you-support/#ixzz4slZ15mah


19 posted on 09/15/2017 9:36:43 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (https://imgoat.com/uploads/645920e395/39513.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

We’re talking about legislation. Trump isn’t trying to force a presidential edict on the country like Obama.

“We the people” put Ryan and the turtle in the majority to pass conservative legislation. It doesn’t matter what Trump, Pelosi, and Chuckie want if republicans in congress want something else.

In the campaign, I heard Trump consistently say things like
* We’ll deal with DACA in a VERY HUMANE way.
* The wall will have a BIG DOOR.
* We’ll get rid of the dangerous ones first (murderers and gang members) and then figure out what to do with the non-dangerous illegals.

To me, extending DACA constitutionally (i.e. by an act of congress) is not contradicting what I heard on the campaign. I’ll admit other people heard other things - Scott Adams describes this pretty well. IF Trump can use DACA to improve other aspects of our immigration policy, it will be almost exactly what I expected. But Rs in congress have been a much bigger problem than I expected so I’m not hoping for much at this point.

My bet is that Rs in congress want almost exactly what Pelosi and Schumer want, and Trump is helping them get it without forcing them to vote against their promises. He’ll take the hit but protect them on DACA. He’s wading into the swamp, which is very dangerous. Hopefully that will give him leverage in other things though I’m not expecting that Trump can fix Rs in congress like I did when he took office.


20 posted on 09/15/2017 9:39:30 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson