Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Took a Freshman GOP Congresswoman To Pull The Mask From FBI Director Comey…
The Conservative Treehouse ^ | March 20, 2017 | Sundance

Posted on 03/20/2017 7:54:30 PM PDT by bobsunshine

Representative Elise M. Stefanik is a young, freshman republican congresswoman from the Albany New York area. And using a probative questioning timeline, she single-handily pulled the mask from FBI Director James Comey, yet no-one seemed to notice.

Obviously Ms. Stefanik has not been in the swamp long enough to lose her common sense.

In the segment of the questioning below Rep. Stefanik begins by asking director Comey what are the typical protocols, broad standards and procedures for notifying the Director of National Intelligence, the White House and senior congressional leadership (aka the intelligence Gang of Eight), when the FBI has opened a counter-intelligence investigation.

The parseltongue response from Comey is a generalized reply (with uncomfortable body language) that notification of counter-intel investigations are discussed with the White House, and other pertinent officials, on a calendar basis, ie. “quarterly”.

With the statement that such counter-intel notifications happen “generally quarterly”, and against the backdrop that Comey stated in July of 2016 a counter-intel investigation began, Stefanik asks:

…”when did you notify the White House, the DNI and congressional leadership”?

(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 115th; 201607; 201703; brennan; cia; clapper; comey; comeyhearing; deepstate; dni; fbi; jamesclapper; notification; nsa; obama; shadowgovernment; stefanik; sundance; trump; whitehouse; wiretapping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: Hostage

DEFIANT F.B.I. CHIEF REMOVED FROM JOB BY THE PRESIDENT ...

www.nytimes.com/1993/.../defiant-fbi-chief-removed-from-job-by-the-president.html

Jul 20, 1993 - WASHINGTON, July 19— President Clinton today dismissed William S. Sessions, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.


101 posted on 03/21/2017 9:24:13 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( Remember during Trump Tower Spydgate, there were No American fingerprints; just Obama's...!!!!:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Yes, she’s a smart one. And she is young so she has enough time to learn how to handle the dirty poker playing of politics. And she seems to me smart enough to learn that too.


102 posted on 03/21/2017 9:26:09 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
Only one director of the FBI has been fired.

Bill Clinton fired William Sessions in 1993 (six years into his term), when Sessions refused to resign over ethics allegations.

-PJ

103 posted on 03/21/2017 9:28:01 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: alexander_busek
William Sessions.

-PJ

104 posted on 03/21/2017 9:29:39 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

I’ve never interpreted the Gowdy look as to stop her but to channel her thoughts as where she was going. (More of an a-ha moment for him. )
If he wanted to stop her it was only to wait to go in for the kill at a later time when the rest of the pack had shown up for an easier kill


105 posted on 03/21/2017 9:29:42 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Yes, the FBI can be fired but there are things that are playing in the background out of view here......

It looks bad for a President to fire an FBI Director who states the President’s team is under investigation.

So maybe it was said to delay his firing by President Trump.

****
Is it possible for Sessions to re-assign McCabe? He’s helping to cover up / stall/ ignore the facts.


106 posted on 03/21/2017 9:30:51 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Liz

I’ve never interpreted the Gowdy look as to stop her but to channel her thoughts as where she was going. (More of an a-ha moment for him. )
If he wanted to stop her it was only to wait to go in for the kill at a later time when the rest of the pack had shown up for an easier kill

***
That explains it better than my thoughts - I thought he was coaching her and suddenly she framed the question better than what he had told her. (as you said - the a-ha moment).


107 posted on 03/21/2017 9:34:49 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama; Liz

I’ve never interpreted the Gowdy look as to stop her but to channel her thoughts as where she was going. (More of an a-ha moment for him. )
If he wanted to stop her it was only to wait to go in for the kill at a later time when the rest of the pack had shown up for an easier kill

***
That explains it better than my thoughts - I thought he was coaching her and suddenly she framed the question better than what he had told her. (as you said - the a-ha moment).


108 posted on 03/21/2017 9:34:50 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Another thought How would Comey have answered if he hadn’t briefed the WH but if it had been the WH who came to him asking for his services in survelancing Trump campaign?
Maybe he didn’t need to inform the WH as they were his original source


109 posted on 03/21/2017 9:35:21 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

I’m not sure about Sessions removing him but certainly, the President can do it.

But I think what’s at play here is a much larger internal investigation of Comey, McCabe and the widespread Muslim Spy Ring.

The President is perhaps leaving them in place while he gets the goods on all of them meaning the whole group and their associates beyond US Borders.

Watching the video of Comey yesterday in the hearing, appeared to me he was shaken, nervous. Heck, he was nervous as he tried to placate the Committee and he was quick to say things how his FBI was doing this and that to be ‘better’. While he was talking, his voice quivered and his body flinched. He was clearly uncomfortable.


110 posted on 03/21/2017 9:40:16 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

Great question! GREAT! Like many great questions, it gets the wheels turning and inspires more ideas.

I might start by first asking “Has the FBI under your leadership ever found evidence of criminal wrongdoing by a Senator or Congressperson?”

If the answer is yes, I’d ask who. If the answer is no, I would laugh in his face and ask him if he really expects me to believe that, and if he thinks he should continue to hold his job seeing as how he is entirely incompetent.

With a yes answer, I’d proceed along your line of questioning. I would ask EXACTLY what was done with that information, how was it used, why was there no prosecution, was the target aware that he was being investigated, was the target aware of any part of what was found out about him, etc.


111 posted on 03/21/2017 9:41:45 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: seastay
"...the real collision is between this willfully blind intelligence committee, Comey and the fallen Obama regime."

~~~~~~~

"collision" -- or -- "collusion"?

112 posted on 03/21/2017 9:44:13 AM PDT by TXnMA (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! REPEAT San Jacinto!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Another thought How would Comey have answered if he hadn’t briefed the WH but if it had been the WH who came to him asking for his services in survelancing Trump campaign?
Maybe he didn’t need to inform the WH as they were his original source

**
Good point - watching the video again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlXXZQgh72Y

He never identifies a timeline of informing the WH, but does reveal the DOJ has known all along.


113 posted on 03/21/2017 9:50:57 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

More times than not, whoever it is, act like they want to get to the bottom of the matter. But in reality they do not.
Everyone CYA.
Their final conclusion: Will have to do a better job of not letting those pesky Russians hack our elections.
Even though they never really proved it was Russians and not.
At least it wasn’t team obama and high ranking FBI and NSA peoples.


114 posted on 03/21/2017 9:52:47 AM PDT by Leep (Cyclops Network News (CNN). The Most Trusted Source Of Fake News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
....what’s at play here is a much larger internal investigation of Comey, McCabe and the widespread Muslim Spy Ring working for Democrats on Capitol Hill......

Plausible....very plausible for one specific reason. The Muslim gang worked for Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee-----the committee oversees all or part of executive branch departments and agencies that impact Americans' safety and security---including the FBI.

Democrats on the House Intelligence Committe oversee these agencies:

• Office of the Director of National Intelligence

• Central Intelligence Agency

• Defense Intelligence Agency

• Department of Defense

• Department of Energy

• Department of Homeland Security

• Department of Justice

• Department of State

• Department of Treasury

• Drug Enforcement Administration

• Federal Bureau of Investigation

• National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

• National Reconnaissance Office

• National Security Agency

• Office of Naval Intelligence

• Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Agency

• United States Army Intelligence and Security Command

• United States Coast Guard Intelligence

• Marine Corps Intelligence Activity

115 posted on 03/21/2017 9:56:35 AM PDT by Liz ( w W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: virgil
While Comey couldn't recall the exact number of FBI officers who had access to Flynn's "unmasked" name, which itself is a telling admission of an insincere effort to investigate, he did allow that the number was 15-20 or so. Of course, that number would include himself and probably his #2, Andrew McCabe, the political hack who supervised the lightning fast review of all those Hillary State Dept. e-mails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop.

Given that many of the leak suspects are at the highest levels of the FBI, the FBI has an inherent conflict of interest and should not be the investigatory agency of the Flynn leak and the other major leaks.

The decision to take the away the investigation from the FBI can only be made by AG Sessions, who probably will consider this matter too close to Russia to decide the matter. That leaves the decision currently to Obama-appointee Dana Boente.

Boente is only there because Grassley and McConnell won't let Sessions' handpicked #2, Rod Rosensteon, have a hearing and confirmation vote.

So that leaves Obama appointees Comey, NSA Director Mike Rogers and Dana Boente in effective control of the leaking case. With Andrew McCabe free to do what he does best.

116 posted on 03/21/2017 10:03:35 AM PDT by plymaniac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
she’s for climate change regulation,

That's a solid red X against her credentials as a conservative.

117 posted on 03/21/2017 10:10:10 AM PDT by Ciaphas Cain (The choice to be stupid is not a conviction I am obligated to respect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ciaphas Cain

well don’t quote me on it, I thought i remembered her being for climate change regulation- during the primaries- there was something else that she was opposed to trump on- I dont’ recall what it was now-


118 posted on 03/21/2017 10:19:33 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: bobsunshine

*


119 posted on 03/21/2017 10:23:31 AM PDT by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Time for a special investigator seperate from the DOJ
They are up to their alligator


120 posted on 03/21/2017 10:30:59 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson