Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate leader to use 'nuclear option' to confirm Supreme Court nominee
Spero News ^ | JAN 22, 2017 | MARTIN BARILLAS

Posted on 01/23/2017 7:08:17 AM PST by Hostage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Gaffer
I believe republicans fear Trump. They know he has the pulpit now, and damn, does he not know how to use it.

Trump could make or break many reelections in two years.

Let the fun...begin.

21 posted on 01/23/2017 7:50:05 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: map

That’s the way I see it too.

It may not be needed, so it’s not appropriate to show that weapon when it may not be needed. But he let it be known the weapon is in his closet.

That’s why I said ‘reevaluate’ and not congratulate. It remains to be seen, but he made it absolutely clear “The nominee will be confirmed”.


22 posted on 01/23/2017 7:52:16 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

“Conservatives should be thinking to reevaluate McConnell. “

It’s not just lefties who need to be afraid of Trump.


23 posted on 01/23/2017 7:53:26 AM PST by PLMerite (Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Well, Trump...the 3-D Chessmaster....did not choose Elaine Chao for no reason...he does have Mitchie by the short hairs now....


24 posted on 01/23/2017 7:56:27 AM PST by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

They need to recognize his support won’t desert him. I’d sooner give up my two Senators and Congressman than to allow them to undermine Trump.

I’m done with false hope and media-defined change. Substantive restorative action is the word for the day.


25 posted on 01/23/2017 7:56:30 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

“THE NOMINEE WILL BE CONFIRMED.”

It’s pretty clear all options are on the table.

**********

It looks to me like McConnell is going to try it without removing the filibuster. If the Dems block it, then he has a pretty strong Plan B to have the rules committee drop the filibuster requirement and then vote to fill the appointment.

Thus, it will be set up so it is the Dems’ fault for forcing the change in the rule on SCOTUS appointments, if such a rule change is effected.


26 posted on 01/23/2017 7:56:54 AM PST by leftcoaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Personally I prefer MIRVs.


27 posted on 01/23/2017 7:58:09 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
It’s pretty clear all options are on the table.

Of course they are. But -- again -- that which the headline of this original post says is NOT what Senator McConnell said. It is the very thing that the Senator avoided saying to Wallace THREE times. Wallace pushed McConnell THREE times to say what this headline says and the Senator did NOT. I am a witness.

The headline is a distortion of what happened in that TV interview. Hence, it is fake.
28 posted on 01/23/2017 8:04:19 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; All
Reid may have not used the nuclear option before the Democrats lost the Senate, but they fully intended to use if and when the retook control.

"Reid: If Hillary wins and Dems retake the Senate, expect Dems to use the Nuclear Option for SCOTUS"

"Harry Reid's Parting Shot: Dems Will Nuke The Filibuster For SCOTUS"

The 2nd link includes Schumer being questioned about his position on Reid's admission of this intention for the Senate after Reid leaves and Schumer takes over. Schumer refused to answer.

Since Reid made this proclamation after he endorsed Schumer to be his successor [ "Harry Reid endorses Chuck Schumer to lead Senate Democrats" ] it would have been beholden upon Schumer to disclaim, or at least distance himself from, this intention - if in fact he did not agree.

McConnel and the GOP could not have wished for a better invitation and justification for a GOP nuclear option for SCOTUS appointments?

29 posted on 01/23/2017 8:09:54 AM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

It’s not fake. It’s an inferential threat because it’s a real option.

Senate Majority Leader ‘to use’ if necessary follows his firm emphatic assertion “The nominee will be confirmed”. So it’s based on inference. That’s not fake.

It’s not distortion because McConnell was asked several times whether he would go nuclear on confirming SCOTUS appointees. And his final answer was “The nominee will be confirmed”. That can only mean he will go nuclear if the democrats try to block the nominee.

You might want to reexamine your usage of the label ‘fake’.


30 posted on 01/23/2017 8:17:48 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

This is probably pretty safe with a net pickup coming in 2018- maybe even 60 GOP senators is Trump turns this ship around.


31 posted on 01/23/2017 8:22:11 AM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
In 2003, then-Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) resorted to the so-called “nuclear option” to confirm lower court nominees, but stopped short of using it for nominees to the high court.

This happened in 2013, not 2003.

-PJ

32 posted on 01/23/2017 8:26:05 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

He’s got a Twitter account and two thumbs.


33 posted on 01/23/2017 8:29:15 AM PST by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Lodi are there ANY blue states left EXCEPT of course CA. & NY, MA. ALL have Dem senators anyway!!!! We do however have some Dem senators that are in red states!!!


34 posted on 01/23/2017 8:29:30 AM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: leftcoaster

They blew up the tradition of not filibustering SC nominees, so screw them and screw the tradition.


35 posted on 01/23/2017 8:30:26 AM PST by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell SAVED the SC seat for Trump... Thank God he did that...


36 posted on 01/23/2017 8:33:05 AM PST by GOPJ (MSNBC didn't 'get' Trump or his base and damn sure don't get 'Drain the Swamp so STFU about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Be Careful; All

Just so readers get the context of your post, Elaine is the wife of Mitch McConnell and President Trump has chosen her for his cabinet.

Yes, 3-D Chessmaster indeed! Lol!

I learn from Donald Trump every day. Although he’s plain spoken, he is one helluva poker player.

He also simultaneously trolled the media on the day he chose Elaine with a tweet about ‘consequences’ to American flag burners. It is so funny to watch the media start whirling about and go chasing a red herring while Trump’s alterior motive goes unnoticed. In this sense, he’s similar to a magician using distraction.

Let me try a practice play:

Say President Trump wants to tax the hell out of remittances to Mexico to pay for the wall and seeks approval from Congress.

He calls Ryan and McConnell and tells them he would like his remittance tax to be buried deep in the details of provisions of budget bills.

As soon as the bills are drafted in committee, President Trump tweets “People are going to see American Flags flying high all over Mexico City.”

The media are besides themselves, there’s talk of invading Mexico, there’s a full media frenzy about American-Mexican relations, there are leftist conspiracy hysterics about internment camps set up for Mexicans, etc.

Meanwhile, the tax bills get passed.

I am so going to love watching this President steamroll the press!


37 posted on 01/23/2017 8:36:25 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
You might want to reexamine your usage of the label ‘fake’.

You were correct and I wanted to reexamine my usage of the label 'fake' and I have.

The headline to this article is a lie. It is not a true statement.

I wonder why you and another poster are kicking against this goad.
38 posted on 01/23/2017 8:41:24 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Yes he did, he most certainly did. And for that he deserves credit.

But remember who wrote ‘The Art Of The Deal’, and remember who Mitch is dealing with.

See previous posts about Mitch’s wife Elaine and I think we can agree that President Trump is in control.


39 posted on 01/23/2017 8:41:52 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

It is not a lie. It is a threat, a credible and real threat.

The context of the title is in the definitive statement made by McConnell which has been referenced several times now. The context conditional is that IF the democrats try to block the nominee, McConnell will have to go nuclear to keep his commitment.

The Title may have been written, “If Schumer blocks SCOTUS pick, McConnell to go nuclear”.

But the chosen title is shorter yet still accurate,


40 posted on 01/23/2017 8:47:12 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson