Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate leader to use 'nuclear option' to confirm Supreme Court nominee
Spero News ^ | JAN 22, 2017 | MARTIN BARILLAS

Posted on 01/23/2017 7:08:17 AM PST by Hostage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Hostage

Great news. Finally McConnell grew a pair — or President Trump ordered him a pair transplanted from some Leftist male who didn’t need them any more.


41 posted on 01/23/2017 8:54:08 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
The Title may have been written, “If Schumer blocks SCOTUS pick, McConnell to go nuclear”.

Your suggestion still would not be an accurate headline describing what Senator McConnell actually told Wallace.

It may have been written "McConnell avoids using the term "nuclear option" regarding Supreme Court nominee."

You can dream up any headline to mean anything you wish to describe the article and can twist the semantics (fake headline, a lie, not true) but this has led nowhere beneficial to either of us.

-30-
42 posted on 01/23/2017 8:59:05 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Mitch holding that football for Charlie Brown once again.

Don’t believe the weasel.


43 posted on 01/23/2017 9:08:17 AM PST by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

“The nominee will be confirmed.”

Which puts us right back to the court balance which gave us such horrific decisions over the past several years.


44 posted on 01/23/2017 9:11:25 AM PST by fwdude (Democrats have not been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Amen brother...amen. I'm pretty encouraged by what Trump said before the election, but real damn encouraged by Trump's inauguration speech. That was so ded-gum in-yo-face to all the blood suckin politicians sitting round about. I could feel the loathing. lol.
45 posted on 01/23/2017 9:12:37 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

McConnell responded to Wallace’s questions of going nuclear with an affirmative “The nominee will be confirmed”.

Now that’s about the fifth time you’ve been told that.

You have now started calling me names as you try to impugn the perspectives of the thread. I would suggest you stop now.


46 posted on 01/23/2017 9:20:36 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Normally I would agree with you. But then there is the fact that the weasel’s wife is in the Trump camp, in his inner ring no less. What does that tell you about the master of The Art Of The Deal?


47 posted on 01/23/2017 9:23:48 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I think I am going to CRY!!


48 posted on 01/23/2017 9:41:01 AM PST by WENDLE (This is the greatest President since George Washington!! It's HERE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Exactly

MitchMack Connel was very careful to NOT say he would use the nuclear option

Wallace kept pressing him on it like the leftist sympathizer he is.

The headline is an example of fakenews to make the republicans look bad.

49 posted on 01/23/2017 9:56:13 AM PST by Syncro (Facts is facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

With the turtle you must verify BEFORE you trust.

He’s a friggin turncoat.


50 posted on 01/23/2017 10:00:53 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
And his final answer was “The nominee will be confirmed”. That can only mean he will go nuclear if the democrats try to block the nominee.

Your opinion doesn't really carry any weight.

The point is that the title is wrong because MM made it quite clear he wasn't going to give Wallace the answer to the question that he wanted.

Another example of the press trying to manipulate people they interview.

Wallace was/is? a neverTrumper.

51 posted on 01/23/2017 10:02:25 AM PST by Syncro (Facts is facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

.
Do you have the slightest idea what you’re talking about?

McConnell appears to be following the straight and narrow on this.
.


52 posted on 01/23/2017 10:07:46 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Your exactly right, he said several times that he believed the nominee would be approved, not once did he say he would invoke the nuclear option, he’s a punk.


53 posted on 01/23/2017 10:17:46 AM PST by saturn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Seems like McConnells line in the sand is the scotus.
Good for him and good for us


54 posted on 01/23/2017 10:55:41 AM PST by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

If McWeasal actually tries to carry through on this threat I look for McIsane and Linday Graham to try and pull another RINO into the democrat column to vote against the rule change. McIsane relish’s these moments to interject himself into the mix to get media coverage.

I seriously don’t think McWeasal has the balls to do this, but this is more of a typical RINO bluff on his part. Might work, might not. If I were the smarmy priCk Schumer I would call his bluff, up to this point McWeasal has folded on everything except obama’s SC nominee.


55 posted on 01/23/2017 11:01:37 AM PST by sarge83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Here are the facts and reasoning:

1. Mitch has no more excuses because now there’s a Republican President.

2. Schumer is on record that he will block the President’s ‘conservative’ SCOTUS nominees.

3. McConnell is on record in response to the question of whether he will go nuclear on the President’s SCOTUS nominee that “the nominee will be confirmed”.

4. President Trump has chosen and welcomed Mitch’s wife Elaine Chao as part of his cabinet and she has accepted (masterful move).

5. McConnell has myriad precedent cases and acts to form a basis for causing the confirmation of President Trump’s conservative nominee to the US Supreme Court.

The above facts convey that a conservative justice will be confirmed to replace Scalia even if McConnell needs to change the rules and invoke cloture on a simple majority.


56 posted on 01/23/2017 11:07:21 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; All

DON'T BACK DOWN! McConnell: Senate WILL Confirm ALL Trump Nominations https://t.co/65i70zLGtR— 🎙Wayne Dupree (@WayneDupreeShow) January 23, 2017

Facts is facts

57 posted on 01/23/2017 12:01:38 PM PST by Syncro (Facts is facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

He did not say “the nuclear option is off the table” which is the sense of the headline.


58 posted on 01/23/2017 12:46:03 PM PST by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
You need another fact.

6. Before retiring from the Senate, Democrat leader Reid made 2 things perfectly clear he wanted Schumer to be his successor and if/when the Democrats regained control of the Senate they would use the nuclear option for SCOTUS appointments. [Reid would not have anointed Schumer without his agreement on this critical issue.]

See post #29 for a source-links.

59 posted on 01/23/2017 12:47:35 PM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

Illinois has two Rats as well. Dumb Dick Durbin is the worst of the two. Tammy Duckworth won’t be much worse than the Republican she beat. Wonder if Kirk had not opposed Trump would he have won?


60 posted on 01/23/2017 12:49:08 PM PST by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson