High-capacity magazine ban a must for Nevadans’ safety (barf alert)

Las Vegas Sun ^ | 11 dec 2016

[Jack Hammer]

This is a mantra for the morons who know nothing about firearms.

Magazines can easly be swapped out in seconds, but let’s ignore that. After all, we don’t care about the facts, we just want to diminate and control firearms owners.

[nonsporting]

There’s simply no legitimate civilian use for magazines that hold dozens upon dozens of rounds of ammunition.

Gun banners are so lacking in imagination.

I'm attacked by 6 anti-Trump protestors who want to beat me up for exercising my freedom of assembly. Handgun rounds are under powered. I may need more than one round on target to stop an attacker. And this assumes I don't miss!

I want 30 round mags cause I may not have time to reload.

There. That was easy.

[Red in Blue PA]

A friend was talking with someone who works professional security. They carry a number of 33 round Glock mags on their person for reloads just in case. I have 33 round Glock mags in my car just in case.

If this is what the professionals do, why should I settle for less to protect my family?

Simple question for libtards everywhere.

[Read Write Repeat]

F Las Vegas!