Ask yourself this: why did the guy with the necktie get away with it, and the other guy did not?
Posted on 10/02/2016 9:05:21 PM PDT by Theoria
Edited on 10/02/2016 9:07:42 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Hillary Clinton was campaigning for her husband in January 1992 when she learned of the race
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
The kitchen was closed, Bill and Hillary were both eating out.
But they lied about it every inch of the way, as they lied about everything because it’s what they do.
First she grappled Bill to the floor, then she slammed a lamp down on his head! That’s how a Hillary grapples!
He was a-skeert of her!
Lol. Don’t forget the part where she kicks him in a sensitive area and gives him a black eye as well.
NYT is worried about Juanita et al. Why else run such a story?
She grappled a nearby ashtray and hurled it across the room.
Despite all of Hillary’s nastiness toward Bill’s victims, I believe Hillary will continue to be regarded by many women as the ultimate victim.
I believe the stronger strategy to gain swing voters is to emphasize Hillary’s trigger finger for war, bringing in Muslim refugees, and bad prescription for the economy/trade deals.
Hillary’s war mongering is a concern even with Huffington Post readers.
We are seeing more, and more of these articles related to Bill’s infidelity as we approach November 8th, because these articles raise the sympathy level for Hillary with women voters. No other reason to increasingly rehash WJC’s sexual exploitations at this time other than to increase turnout by women for Hillary.
Like Newt said, the Clinton’s know how to fight in the gutter, and this is precisely what he means. Bringing up this stuff to divert attention from legitimate issues, and draw us down into their gutter World where they are King, and Queen, or force them to address the real issues of the day, and present plans of how to resolve those issues in a way that’s good for America. The Clinton’s can’t do it, or they would have already.
The Slimes is trying to humanize/immunize Hillary.
She wasn’t a ball-breaking, hyper ambitious dyke who misrepresented her sexual orientation, not at all. That darned Bill! Who she says she wants to put ‘in charge of the economy’ and presumably the Dept. of Wildlife. So no hard feelings ...
Try to make a sainted martyr of her, NYT. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Ask yourself this: why did the guy with the necktie get away with it, and the other guy did not?
sorry but Trump is the king of insult politics... not saying this in a bad way.. but just remember marco rubio trying to play trump and how quickly he lost..
I’ll bet that journoblogger Megan Twohey of Sulzberger’s Blog doesn’t mention “Norma Asnes” once...
I’m not talking about Trump, or Marco Rubio. I’m talking about why we are seeing more, and more of these types of articles rehashing WJC’s infidelity.
I only want to say why we are seeing these things rehashed, and not to fall for the Clinton campaign induced MSM BS by design to keep us off balance, and discussing nonsense instead of issues.
You can invoke commentary on “old news” Hillary Clinton some of the time and call it news, but you can’t invoke commentary on “old news” Hillary Clinton all of the time and call it news. Wikileaks is still pending.
When was the LAST time Hillary “Grappled with Bill Clinton’s Infidelity” (his nickname for his tool)? It’s been a long, long time, pre Monica I think.
She had a bastard child with Webb Hubbell. What was she supposed to say?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.