Ask yourself this: why did the guy with the necktie get away with it, and the other guy did not?
The kitchen was closed, Bill and Hillary were both eating out.
But they lied about it every inch of the way, as they lied about everything because it’s what they do.
NYT is worried about Juanita et al. Why else run such a story?
She grappled a nearby ashtray and hurled it across the room.
Despite all of Hillary’s nastiness toward Bill’s victims, I believe Hillary will continue to be regarded by many women as the ultimate victim.
I believe the stronger strategy to gain swing voters is to emphasize Hillary’s trigger finger for war, bringing in Muslim refugees, and bad prescription for the economy/trade deals.
Hillary’s war mongering is a concern even with Huffington Post readers.
We are seeing more, and more of these articles related to Bill’s infidelity as we approach November 8th, because these articles raise the sympathy level for Hillary with women voters. No other reason to increasingly rehash WJC’s sexual exploitations at this time other than to increase turnout by women for Hillary.
Like Newt said, the Clinton’s know how to fight in the gutter, and this is precisely what he means. Bringing up this stuff to divert attention from legitimate issues, and draw us down into their gutter World where they are King, and Queen, or force them to address the real issues of the day, and present plans of how to resolve those issues in a way that’s good for America. The Clinton’s can’t do it, or they would have already.
Try to make a sainted martyr of her, NYT. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Ask yourself this: why did the guy with the necktie get away with it, and the other guy did not?
I’ll bet that journoblogger Megan Twohey of Sulzberger’s Blog doesn’t mention “Norma Asnes” once...
You can invoke commentary on “old news” Hillary Clinton some of the time and call it news, but you can’t invoke commentary on “old news” Hillary Clinton all of the time and call it news. Wikileaks is still pending.
When was the LAST time Hillary “Grappled with Bill Clinton’s Infidelity” (his nickname for his tool)? It’s been a long, long time, pre Monica I think.
She had a bastard child with Webb Hubbell. What was she supposed to say?
This actually wasn’t a very nice piece about the scumbag Clintons.
Of course, they left out the rape parts and all the broken ashtrays that were a casualty of those two pieces of white trash making it to the White House.
The Clintons are not like the rest of us.
Just imagine you were a serial adulterer.
Instead of divorcing you as soon as she found out your wife decides to lead the effort to slander and demean the “other women”.
What percentage of women would do that?
One out of every thousand?
One out of every million?
One out of every billion?
Welcome to Hillary-land. They don’t even have a psychiatric category for her mental disorder.
We care about the powerless women he raped and the witch bullied. We care about the women Clinton had the State Police bring to him... the abuse of power. The criminal mentality in both the Clintons. Does the New York Times team think we're concerned about the liberal sluts Clinton 'dicks'? Come on Megan Twohey... this isn't 1950.
We care about the women raped, bullied and damaged. And about a women who would use the power of the state to shut up his victims. Check out Kathleen's story... and the women Clinton had is State Police bring to him. Show some backbone Hegan Twohey... get the story about abuse of power, or bullying the powerless, about all the liars in high places that protected the Clintons... Be a real journalist.
Given the way Hillary destroys the women her husband rapes or seduces, it’s sad that so many women identify with Hillary rather than with Hillary’s victims. Is that because the women who identify with Hillary are losers (very likely), because they are the 33% who see themselves as the victims of infidelity and don’t mind her lashing out, or just because they are looking for an excuse?
I’m proud that my wife is disgusted by Hillary.
Sounds like the Times is running. Interference the Hildabeast in anticipation of some revelations.
They sure are busy over there at the Times,spewing Hillary’s talking point attacks as trying to anticipate the enemies moves