Posted on 09/29/2016 8:37:50 PM PDT by mbrfl
It is time for the Trump campaign to embrace new language regarding the MSM`s clear disregard for nuetrality It is no longer accurate or effective to refer to it as media bias. Not only is media bias an innacurate term, it`s a term that is used so often, that people tune it out. The truth of the matter is much worse than simply media bias.
The new language Trump needs to use in the debates is to call it a conspiracy. We are dealing with a conspiracy to keep pertinent information from the voting public.
If he faces the same lopsided questioning in the next debate he needs to just break in at some point and say something to the effect of `Before I answer your question, I have to say something, because you leave me no choice. Why is it that the viewing audience knows more about a conversation I had with Miss Venezuela 20, years ago than they do about Hillary`s obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence? The reason is that there is a conspiricy in this country by the corporate media and their allies in the Democratic party to keep the public ignorant of these very seriose crimes.
More accurate and more hard hitting language needs to be used to expose the media corruption.
Excellent !!
I wonder whats going on.
Trump goes dormant in Debate 1
No and I mean none, zero,zip,nada trump ads.
If he starts using words like “conspiracy”, he will be judged crazy, seeing conspiracies everywhere, unfit for president.
He did fine and will continue to do so. They can claim he lost the debate, but they have nothing tangible they can use to attack him.
The one thing that would help, is to have Sean Hannity as the moderator, asking Hillary the right questions, but we can’t have that either.
This is a town hall/pajama boy audience. He has to feel their pain. Not diss her so much as emphasize with the audience.
I respectfully disagree. It`s time for conservatives to turn the tables on the word `conspiricy`. The left labels conservatives as conspiricy theorists when they wish to discredit a story. We were called conspiricy theorsts when discussing Hillary`s health, then we were proven right when she collapsed on 9/11. It needs to be pointed out that we were not conspiring to falsely attack her regarding her health, as they wrongly claim. They were the ones who conspired to hide truth from the public.
We need to start challenging the left on the politically correct rules of language that they have drummed into us. We need to do it intelligently. But it`s time to stop playing by the language rules the left places in front of us. We need to take back the language.
I saw the first Trump ads here in Maine tonight....I was quite happy to see them!
You are correct.
If he turns this into Trump vs MSM he leaves a wide opening for Hillary.
He needs to hammer her, no excuses about Chelsea, and he needs to make her the face of the dem party.
I`m not talking about a gratuitous attack on the media, but more as an opening to force them to discuss these issues. I would say something like, `You know, we`re 30 minutes into this debate, and we`ve talked extensively about my tax returns, Miss Venezuela, and a law suit from 40 years ago, and not one question about why Hillary deleted emails under subpeona, destroyed phones with hammers, etc. I have no problem answering the questions you asked, but you have an obligation to raise the issues I just mentioned, with Hillary. Then let the people decide which is more important.`
.
Nail, meet hammer! Good stuff.
The term, `conspiricy theory` has become unjustly maligned. Don`t get me wrong, there are plenty of conspiricy theories that deserve derision. But we also have to remember that conspiricies actually can and do exist in the real world, and they are rarely the sort of thing where those involved have secret meetings, secret passwords and handshakes,etc.
Often times people are involved in a conspiricy without even knowing it (e.g., useful idiots in the media doing the bidding of party elites or globalists without even realizing their role in the big picture.)
You are misspelling conspiracy.
Schweinhunde! ;-)
Ouch! Sorry about that :). I wish I was a better speller. I`m typing this from a phone with no spell check.
He should demand that Rudy be debate moderator, otherwise he’s not going to participate. He did something similar already in the primaries so there’s a precedent.
He needs to establish early on (and before the debate as and where possible) that he recognizes the tactic of Clinton and her media pals to obfuscate the big issues with all sorts of irrelevant white noise, such as Trump’s spat with a beauty pageant contestant or things he did ten, twenty, even forty years ago.
He should say, “well if we’re going to talk about the minute details of our lives, many people believe that it’s dangerous to oppose you and your husband, and fifty people or so have rather mysteriously come to an untimely end when they did oppose you. Compared to bad-mouthing a beauty queen, I think that’s pretty serious. Shall we look into this more? I hope to have the resources to do that starting in January.”
And he should add, “maybe I declared bankruptcy in my own business career, but you’ve been a big part of an administration that is bankrupting America, and we’re talking trillions and trillions of dollars (it’s huge) ...”
and he should have all the necessary details memorized so he can give specific answers if pressed on these claims.
As to global warming and climate change being such a big deal, I would love to see him bring up some examples of past weather events which, if they happened this year, would certainly be trotted out as proof of the failing theory ... the 1900 Galveston hurricane (a much worse disaster than Katrina) ... the Great Hurricane of 1780, it killed 25,000 people in the West Indies and destroyed every house and structure on Barbados ... the Tri-State tornado of March 1925, it killed over seven hundred people in the Midwest. Or the 1936 heat waves that were more severe than anything we’ve seen in recent years. I would give these examples and ask, so what about this theory now?
Agreed.
He needs to point out that while his flaws are paraded across all media, they are normal personal flaws and mistakes, but that Hillary has committed serious felonies that are COMPLETELY IGNORED (naming some).
>> there is a conspiricy in this country
Too much tinfoil... an alternative (and unfortunate fact):
“There is a corporate media alliance with the Democrat operatives... “
Not bias, its corruption
I am hoping he improves his performance next time. I am hoping he learns a lesson and actually prepares for the next debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.