Posted on 05/21/2016 11:16:13 AM PDT by pinochet
Before I address the gay issue, I will first begin by talking about feminism. I am about to discuss a very delicate and sensitive issue. It is about the role that extreme radical feminists have played, in building a culture that promotes gay marriages and transgender male behavior. When I talk about extreme radical feminists, I am not talking about your regular radical feminist. I am talking about feminists who hate men more than they love women. These fanatical women would be willing to inflict great suffering on women, so long as men suffer a great deal more than men.
These are Stalinist women, many of whom have graduate degrees and law degrees. These women are not treated as the mad women that they are, but are regarded by the media and academia as respected women's rights activists. One of the stereotypes that many male conservatives have about women, is that women are incapable of the same type of evil thinking that motivated Josef Stalin to murder millions of middle-class Kulaks in Ukraine in 1932. I hope the Planned Parenthood Videos of Stalinist women selling the bodies of dead babies, awakened them to the mindset of Stalinist women. The Cambodian Stalinist, Pol Pot, repeated the crime, this time against millions of middle-class people in Cambodia in 1975-1979.
Who do you think the Kulaks of the 21st Century are? If you are a participant of this forum, I want you to look closely at the mirror, and you will see one of them. I want all of you to read two articles by the brilliant scholar, Heather Mac Donald.
This one: http://www.city-journal.org/html/campus-rape-myth-13061.html
And this more recent one: http://www.mindingthecampus.org/2015/03/the-rape-epidemic-on-campus-does-not-exist/http://www.mindingthecampus.org/2015/03/the-rape-epidemic-on-campus-does-not-exist/
If you reflect deeply on those articles, you will realize that Heather Mac Donald is doing the most important work of any conservative intellectual in America, even more important than that done by Ann Coulter.
Some background is important. During the sexual revolution of the 1960s, when most feminists supported sexual liberation, a tiny group of dissident feminists emerged, who were more fanatically opposed to pornography than Christian pastors. But while most pastors wanted to limit public availability of pornography, these dissident feminists wanted mass arrests and imprisonment of men who possessed pornography. They claimed that their opposition to pornography was to prevent the exploitation of women. This gained feminism some respect from conservative Christians.
Since that time, the agenda of these Stalinist women has become clear. Their main target is middle-class heterosexual white men who behave the way in which members of the group normally behave. They want to criminalize such men out of existence. The Stalinist women have expanded beyond their wildest imagination, and have taken control of academia and the district attorneys offices.
They have promoted the falsehood that 20 to 25 percent of white males in college are rapists, and this falsehood has become widely accepted in academia. In contrast, the underclass Hispanic males in LA and black males in Detroit, commit rape at a rate of 0.05 percent. This means that white college men rape college women at a rate that is 500 times greater than underclass black and Hispanic men. If you want to know why there has been a drastic increase of middle-class white males on the lists of registered sexual offenders, it may not necessarily be because they are sexual criminals, but that they may be victims of Stalinist feminism. Of course, the Stalinist feminists do not give a damn about lower class Hispanic or black women. Their minority attackers do not enjoy the white-skin privilege, which the pale-skinned college-age kulaks supposedly enjoy.
Now we go to the gay issue. Many young men below the age of 30, have had the misfortune to have such Stalinist feminists as mothers. If you are 40 years or older, the generation that produced your parents had much fewer Stalinist women, and you are very likely a well-adjusted man who does not know why the young generation of white men is acting so crazy (Bernie Sanders???).
This trend is not just limited to America. In Sweden, the Global headquarters of the Stalinist feminists, they passed a harsh law against prostitution that turned men who buy sex into the only criminals in the prostitution business. Female prostitutes have been given 100 percent immunity from arrest and prosecution, because they are "victims". Think of the blackmail opportunities.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/aug/08/criminsalise-buying-not-selling-sex
Amazingly, women prostitutes have suffered more from the law than men, because male landlords are evicting prostitutes from apartments, for fear that they may be accused of being pimps and running brothels.
Interestingly, white Swedish women suffer from the highest rate of rape in Europe, at the hands of Muslim immigrant men. White women who report on those rapes are called racists, and there is no interest from the authorities in prosecuting those crimes. Guess the skin color of the men targeted by the prostitution law (hint: it is not the Muslim men).
Think how hard life is for young white men under the age of 25 in some parts of the Western world, including some parts of America. If you try asking a woman for a date, you may be accused of sexual harassment. The only way you can have sex without being hounded by the Stalinist feminists, is to have sex with another man. I am acquainted with a couple of young men who were raised by Stalinist feminists, and these men go for therapy on a regular basis. It is from them that I heard that some young men who enter same sex marriages in their 20s, do so as virgins, as a way to escape from the households of their Stalinist mothers. I think the Donald Trump phenomena represents an unconscious rebellion by white male Kulaks in America, against their Stalinist persecutors.
And women’s lives matter — to the ill or to the good; the choice is human.
The general tendency of women to have a forte to nurture and of men to have a forte to openly fight, does not excuse women from the need to choose wisely what and how they nurture any more than it excuses men from the need to choose what and how they openly fight.
We will have come full circle when once more we embrace the truth that God has a superior plan which humankind (of both sexes) has wandered off on. There are prodigal daughters just as much as prodigal sons.
This one: http://www.city-journal.org/html/campus-rape-myth-13061.html
And this more recent one: http://www.mindingthecampus.org/2015/03/the-rape-epidemic-on-campus-does-not-exist/http://www.mindingthecampus.org/2015/03/the-rape-epidemic-on-campus-does-not-exist/
And in the meantime — it may have to happen that God will raise up people who will cross role boundaries, not in a way that is forbidden, but in a way that makes up for the other AWOL role. Women will have to openly fight when the men are not willing. Men will have to nurture when the women are being hard hearted.
By trumping up any old flirtation by a fellow as a rape, the screaming liberals make the situation out to be much worse than it is.
And yet even so, their answer isn’t to return to old fashioned morality, which would also moderate the flirtations — go figure! No they want to flirt, but only their way. It’s like they kill the kings and then become the queens.
This guy needs to get out more. In fact, radical lesbian feminists have been in the forefront of fighting transgenderism! Now, the gay marriage thing may be another story but it was a male, Andrew Sullivan, who put it on the map. That creep doesn’t get enough credit for helping to destroy civilization. I’ve said it once, I’ll say it again: America is very bad for Brits, particularly, of the gay variety. I’ve warned Milo Yiannapolis about this but does he listen?
I threw up a little in my mouth just reading the headline, I don’t think I can handle reading the article.
I got confused a little in my brain just reading the headline!
That depends on if they changed the definition of virgin or not. Maybe it now means after 1000 ‘partners’ it resets back to zero.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.