Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five Reasons To Reconsider The Ruger Mini-14
dailycaller.com ^ | 3/23/2016 | Brian Sheetz

Posted on 03/26/2016 5:51:49 AM PDT by rktman

When it comes to .223 Rem. semi-automatic rifles, Ruger’s Mini-14 has long been one of the obvious choices. And it’s no wonder, considering it offers nearly the same handiness as the M1 Carbine, the ballistics of the AR15, and the feel of the classic M1 Garand and M14. The Mini’s popularity confirms its strong perceived relevance among a wide range of users, and sustained sales for more than 40 years is evidence of its sound design—even if it’s unfairly judged by the same criteria as today’s predominant platform, the AR, which enjoys the huge advantages of U.S. military adoption and unlimited manufacturing sources. So while some consider the Mini a bit dowdy or lowly, it is actually a serious standout worth giving a second look. Here are just five of the many reasons why a Mini Ranch, Tactical, Target or Thirty model should be on your short list the next time you shop for a modern rifle:

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; mini14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: SolidRedState

Easier to modify the mags.


61 posted on 03/26/2016 8:29:29 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Cruz=VAT tax= No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

The 556 is loaded to higher chamber pressure than the 223. When fired in a 223 chamber (shorter leade) the gun experiences higher pressures than experienced in a 556 chamber.

Physically, you would have difficulty measuring the physical difference on the 2 rounds (the specs overlap), the difference is in their interior ballistics behavior.

Best accuracy is seldom at max loading for most ammunition.


62 posted on 03/26/2016 8:30:47 AM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Live round or expended?


63 posted on 03/26/2016 8:30:57 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Cruz=VAT tax= No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Dang,
sounds Bad.

Minis seem overpriced as well,


64 posted on 03/26/2016 8:32:09 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Live


65 posted on 03/26/2016 8:32:54 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Apparently the WD-40 will render the round inert for shipping purposes.


66 posted on 03/26/2016 8:34:06 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

It sucks.


67 posted on 03/26/2016 8:34:32 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

The only unsatisfactory experience I have had with firing mil spec ammo in a .223 chamber was with an early (late 1980s) Kimber. The rifle had a very tight chamber and lacked sufficient expansion room in the neck. Like you, I have used mill spec brass and commercial brass interchangably with no issue. The ammo is fired in AR, M16 and various commercial bolt action platforms plus a Ruger #1.


68 posted on 03/26/2016 8:35:53 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger

I enjoyed the rifle when it works right. Lots of problems with the feed. Now I can’t even open it. I could force it but that pesky 223 is waiting for that chance to take my thumb off.


69 posted on 03/26/2016 8:37:50 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

WD-40 kills the powder and the primer. If you have no experience removing rounds from the breech then it is best to send it to Ruger or take it to the local gunsmith. Once the round is “dead” then it is relatively easy (usually) to remove it. Is this by chance a steel cased round?


70 posted on 03/26/2016 8:37:51 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Cruz=VAT tax= No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I bought my Mini-14 in 1975. I’ve been happy with is.
I’ve .223 hollow point for hunting and 5.56 military surplus ball for target shooting.
I’ll usually do a 3” group at 200 yards, so I have no complaints.
I paid $299 for it when I bought it 40 years ago.


71 posted on 03/26/2016 8:38:14 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Slavery will continue to exist and thrive as long a Islam continues to exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The cost of a Ruger Mini-14 is the same as an AR-15. Why bother to get an inferior weapon?


72 posted on 03/26/2016 8:38:18 AM PDT by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

“No they didn’t. My mini-ranch will not fire 5.56.”

Depends on the year made and version of the Mini-14.

My Ranch Rifle is stamped for the 5.56 and .223 rounds.

http://www.ruger.com/products/mini14RanchRifle/models.html

The Tactical Rifle is stamped .223 only. I do not know why.

http://www.ruger.com/products/mini14TacticalRifle/models.html


73 posted on 03/26/2016 8:44:00 AM PDT by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

It’s the Remington UMC .55 grain Brass


74 posted on 03/26/2016 8:46:33 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: IndispensableDestiny

“It’s not scary looking:”

In CA, the scary looking AR-15 requires a bullet button and has a maximum 10 round magazine. The non-scary looking Mini-14 does not have a bullet button and you can load a 20 or 30 round magazine without modification (although it is illegal to possess one in CA).


75 posted on 03/26/2016 8:50:33 AM PDT by chrisinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The one I had-I lost it in the bottom of the lake, I never cleaned the action for a couple years. It would NEVER fail to fire, EVER.

But it was a scatter gun. But would still put 20 rounds into a man sized target at a 100 yards, soooo.


76 posted on 03/26/2016 8:52:14 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Interesting. In any case (pun intended) WD-40 is the first step. Get the receiver submerged and fill the barrel with it. A gallon paint can is what I use. Autozone here carries WD by the gallon - not aerosol. Check it every few days and keep the barrel full. Also I have had rounds come loose after the WD treatment.

Mind gun safety and barrel discipline. PM me if you want to chat about it after it has soaked for a few weeks.


77 posted on 03/26/2016 8:53:46 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Cruz=VAT tax= No thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

I have two gallons of WD-40. Just need to get a vessel.


78 posted on 03/26/2016 8:55:18 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

I had mine in the Eighties. I didn’t remember hearing about any fix for it then. Got rid of it pretty quickly.


79 posted on 03/26/2016 8:55:49 AM PDT by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

When it first jammed I was beating on the slide with a rubber hammer. I decided to stop as that damn round was going to blow up in my face.

Thanks for taking the time to respond. I will certainly let you know the outcome, as this is a rare event.


80 posted on 03/26/2016 8:59:21 AM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson