Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATCH: Debunking anti-Cruz myths (video)
Trevor Louden's New Zeal ^ | Feb 11, 2016 | Kristine Ruff

Posted on 03/11/2016 3:17:42 PM PST by JSDude1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: skeeter

I’m not into idolatry either. I think he is genuinely sincere, otherwise, I would not be supporting him.


61 posted on 03/11/2016 5:35:27 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
You’re friggin’ nuts. Don’t ping me again. I have better things to do than read crap from a nutjob like you.

Here's a suggestion for you, then. Don't start up conversations in order to insult and attack those you disagree with.... and you won't get your ass handed to you for showing the usual name-calling, insults and projection idiocy. Or is that too simple a solution?

62 posted on 03/11/2016 5:37:18 PM PST by XenaLee (The only good commie is a dead commie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

I imagine that would take a leap of faith. Because aside from a few common rhetorical themes there’s very little in his past that would indicate that he will do as president what he’s promising to do. IMO


63 posted on 03/11/2016 5:40:15 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

You can imagine whatever you desire. I don’t rely on your approval.


64 posted on 03/11/2016 5:42:43 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: jstaff

“Think about it, Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin are now the enemy, and Sundance and Camile Paglia on Salon are righteous icons. What the hell is happening here?”

Excellent point. Dissent will not be tolerated by some. Fine if that makes them feel more secure, though it is like the left to try to scream loudly enough to shut down debate. But no reason to be nasty about it as well.


65 posted on 03/11/2016 5:48:34 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
I don’t rely on your approval.

This kind of unnecessary aversion is typical from you Trump folks. Its as if your icon has set you free to be as obnoxious as he is.

66 posted on 03/11/2016 5:51:03 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Wow, you sure are touchy. I do not need your approval is just a statement of fact that somehow in your mind is an obnoxious statement. Get over yourself. I am perfectly capable of thinking for myself without someone telling me I am making a leap in faith.

There is well documented proof of Donald's love of this country that has been so good to him. Pure and simple for my belief he is sincere.

67 posted on 03/11/2016 6:29:10 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Donglalinger

you mean like ben carson?
Oh, wait, thats the other guy...


68 posted on 03/11/2016 6:54:50 PM PST by RaceBannon (Rom 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
natural born citizen needs no clarification by Immigration law or any other clarification. It merely clarifies him as a citizen.

It clarified him as a US citizen BY BIRTH. Read carefully and you will find no assertion that any such clarification was 'needed'. But, considering all the crap people seem to believe about natural born citizenship, a clarification was certainly useful.

69 posted on 03/11/2016 7:06:58 PM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
The fact that Congress had to make a ruling on a citizen born with certain circumstances clarifies they are a citizen, period. A natural born citizen needs no such clarification. That is why they specifically made the reference to a natural born citizenship as a special requirement. With a natural born citizen there is no question as to their citizenship at all.

With your loose interpretation an anchor baby is a natural born citizen. That is not the case either. They are citizens by virtue of the manipulation of the 14th Amendment to bring Jus Soli to be interpreted as the law, though that was certainly not the intent of the 14th Amendment.

70 posted on 03/11/2016 7:38:48 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
A natural born citizen needs no such clarification. That is why they specifically made the reference to a natural born citizenship as a special requirement. With a natural born citizen there is no question as to their citizenship at all.

Apparently there was such a need, for here you are questioning Ted Cruz's natural born citizenship.

With your loose interpretation an anchor baby is a natural born citizen.

Now you are just making things up. That is NOT my position, in fact it is the opposite of my position. But it happens to be the position adopted by a series of very bad court decisions that need action to correct.

71 posted on 03/12/2016 5:32:28 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong
Further to my response, I only direct you to Emmerich Vattel: "I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”
72 posted on 03/12/2016 5:37:38 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Ted’s father was a Canadian citizen. His mother was on the Canadian voter rolls. This is not a natural born citizen.


73 posted on 03/12/2016 6:34:15 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

You have your facts wrong. Once you get your facts right, you can start working on your reasoning.


74 posted on 03/12/2016 9:30:38 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

Well one thing is for certain, one of us have their facts wrong, but it isn’t me.


75 posted on 03/12/2016 10:36:06 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
Cruz supports Black Lives Matter - what a cuck!
76 posted on 03/12/2016 9:18:00 PM PST by bucephalus (Sarah loves me, not you - back off, ingrates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Ted Cruz used a sleazy personalized Shaming Mailers in Iowa TRUE!


77 posted on 03/17/2016 3:11:37 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson