CPAC 2016 - Dennis Prager (video) (4:43)

YouTube ^ | March 3, 2016 | The ACU

[EveningStar]

Published on Mar 3, 2016

Join the conversation at #CPAC

[EveningStar]

SoCal Ping!



Attention Southern Californians

Please ping me with any Southern California related articles. Thank you!

If you want on or off this ping list, please FReepmail me.

[stars & stripes forever]

The ‘open-door, big tent’ C-PAC no longer embraces GOD, FAMILY, & COUNTRY.

[stephenjohnbanker]

It was hijacked years ago.

[euram]

No wonder Trump cancelled. Prager and Beck what a pair.

[MNDude]

So what is Prager going to say if Trump is the nominee. He has always berated libertarians for not plugging their nose and voting for whoever the Republican nominee may be.

Does he say if he’ll plug his nose and vote for Trump? Just curious.

[EveningStar]

Prager has said repeatedly that he will vote for Trump if he’s the nominee. In fact, he said it again today on his show.

[FreedomGuru]

I have great respect for Dennis, well it’s quickly shrinking. He is one of the anti Trump fanatics. He is obsessed like many here.

[bramps]

All one needs to know about Dennis Prager is that he is pro choice.
He is one of Satan's most clever spokesmen.

[truth_seeker]

“Prager has said repeatedly that he will vote for Trump if he’s the nominee. In fact, he said it again today on his show.”

Okay that is settled. Trump can and should be judicious in how he allocates his time and priorities going forward.

Walking into pre-planned ambushes and buzzsaws is not necessary.

When it settles in that he has a very large following, that he may be the eventual nominee, some of the anguish will subside.

Don’t forget that nothing was certain in 1980, that John Anderson ran as a moderate protest candidate to Reagan.

I’m not claiming Reagan and Trump are alike or similar. Different times, different issues. Today the one major issue is ripping conservatism out of the hands of professional vested interests that have abused the trust.

[EveningStar]

Walking into pre-planned ambushes and buzzsaws is not necessary.

What pre-planned ambushes and buzzsaws are you talking about?

[ifinnegan]

“All one needs to know about Dennis Prager is that he is pro choice.”

Not true.

[KansasGirl]

[No wonder Trump cancelled. Prager and Beck what a pair.]

What did Prager say that you disagreed with?

[bramps]

Sorry but he is. I choose my words carefully when I called him one of Satan’s most clever spokesmen (his ability to attempt to put lipstick on a pig):

http://www.lukeford.net/Dennis/p41.html
Prager also touched on abortion, “safe sex,” evangelicals and other issues. On abortion: “Many if not most abortions are not moral, but legally a woman should have the right to choose to have one because I don’t believe abortion is murder. But I’m grateful to Christians who have raised the issue because society has become too cavalier about abortion. “I distinguish a lot between moral and legal, which is why I can be pro-choice and anti-abortion. I don’t want to make illegal everything I hold is immoral. I think adultery’s immoral, but I don’t want to make it illegal. I would like to be free to educate people that it is immoral, though.”

[euram]

He always goes on anti-Trump rants. He is part of the anti-Trump National Review issue.

[truth_seeker]

“What pre-planned ambushes and buzzsaws are you talking about?”

—Any debate, in particular the fiascos like Fox last night

—CPAC

—Any obvious setup

BTW I checked the OC GOP website, and they have a straw poll. Trump leasds with 30%

[ifinnegan]

Thanks for your link. It is from 25 years ago.

I do not think his position is “pro-choice” in the way it is generally understood.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMwkQVpy98A

See the above link for Prager himself making the case for the immorality of abortion.

In that you may be right in that as far as I know he does not argue for criminalizing abortion, nor does he argue against it , therefore since abortion is currently legal, he is “pro-choice”.

But he always argues it is immoral. Has never supported liberal or pro-life politicians. Has never been for appointing a pro-choice Justice, in fact just the opposite.

I would be interested if 25 years later he would still use the term pro-choice to describe himself.

Ok, and given this is about Trump. Trump has been pro-choice very recently. He even talked about how he initially wanted to have an abortion when his mistress Marla Maples got pregnant (She did not have an abortion and he divorced his first wife and married his mistress after the baby was born). Now he says he is pro-life.

Has Trump ever said abortion should be illegal?

I think your comments on Prager are fair enough. But I wonder why Trump also wouldn’t be disqualified under your standards.

[Duchess47]

Slander much?

[DoughtyOne]

[bramps]

Trump has actually said he is now pro life. Would I bet the ranch that he is telling the truth. No way. But I have seen what seems like a serious anger in him when the other candidates call him pro choice. I’m hoping he is influenced by some of the folks around him (Sarah Palin for example) and becomes a more moral and God fearing man if he is elected. Yes, so far he is not filling me with confidence. But he also being ruthlessly attacked and obviously is someone not well able to turn the other cheek.

I would like the other candidates to ask him pointed questions about the issue to be as certain as possible. I especially would like to know that planned parenthood doesn’t get one penny if they ever have anything to do with abortion again. If he did say something that told me he was unquestionably not serious about the issue, I would vote Cruz. But Ted has not exactly been a model of purity so far in this very strange campaign.

Have a good weekend.