Posted on 03/02/2016 7:45:45 PM PST by jazusamo
The worst political blunder of all time, according to scientist Freeman Dyson, was the decision of the emperor of China in 1433 to cut off his country from the outside world. In the wake of that decision, China lost its position in the forefront of human achievements and fell behind, over the centuries, to become a Third World country.
Before the end of this month, the United States of America may break that record for the worst political blunder of all time. Professor Dyson attributed the Chinese emperor's blunder to "powerful people pursuing partisan squabbles and neglecting the long-range interests of the empire." That can be our path to disaster as well.
After the results of "Super Tuesday," we find ourselves with front-runners in their respective parties who each could, as President of the United States, take the decline of America under the Obama administration, even further down, to a point of no return.
As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was in charge of the foreign policy that destroyed governments in Egypt and Libya that were no threat to America's interests or allies, and plunged both countries into a turmoil from which only Egypt managed to rescue itself, while Libya has become another hotbed of terrorist activity.
Yet Secretary Clinton is running on her "experience" — even though it is an experience of unmitigated disasters for America, around the world. Her e-mail scandals and lies are important mainly as symptoms of her utter disregard of anything other than her own financial and political interests.
(Excerpt) Read more at creators.com ...
Why? Because, despite Trump’s reckless rhetoric and shallow reasoning, he is a deal-maker who will not let principles stand in the way of anything that promotes the ego of Donald Trump.>>> my how such a great thinker and i like sowel, now is readiing the mind of another person. Is Thomas losing rationality. and was the squable in china the building of the wall. i guess it was. so china builds a wall to keep the creaps out and proceeds to build an incredible civilization. tom you used to write about these.
More lowdown on this corrupt organization here, just follow the dots to the R&D establishment elites... http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
I admit how old I was exactly back then is now a little foggy and could be plus/minus a year.
You?>>> very cool smack down i wish i had done that i was an ace in math in high school and never did the homework until threatened by the teacher. went to bible college instead and then in 1980. did my dream i was 4.0 at DCCC (comunity college taught by phi beta kappa prof) in pa when i relearned algebra to go to engineering school. learnt computers and went that route.
“But for decades this nation has been sliding down the crapper while Sowell and the Republican elite have ****DONE NOTHING****.
There you go. We had a chance with Reagan and we didn’t disband the unconditional Dept. of Indoctrination——it was a BIG mistake to allow our children to be destroyed by Leftists. We didn’t get rid of the “progressive” Marxist tax system and the money laundering foundations-—systems which just fund the takeover of judges/our courts/our textbook industries, etc.
But—the worst thing-—is we allowed Virtue and Right Reason to be eliminated from “Just Laws” which makes them Evil Laws (and unconstitutional.). Cicero noted that once Just Laws are evil—promote vice, theft, and punish virtue-—it will collapse the culture.
It was my understanding (granted it has been many years since sociology 101, and that before political correctness developed its stranglehold on higher education) that the reason China declined from its high level of science, technology, liberal arts, etc., was not because of the wall, the wall had little to do with it. Indeed the wall was the result of their great wealth, perseverance, and engineering capabilities. China fell because of the decline of their great monotheistic faith, replaced first with ancestor worship which then became a sort of polytheism and concomitant rise in superstition with the practice of immoral and barbaric behaviors such as slavery, homosexuality, pederasty, polygamy, drug abuse, and infanticide. As well, with this moral decline and growth of superstition, came the inability to observe and think objectively, which ultimately led to the scientific and economic stagnation of their great civilization. And as the Chinese people slid into this moral decline, with every aspect of their daily lives dominated by fearful superstition, and with no firm moral code to guide them, eventually the nation fell like rotten fruit. And so will we, if we forget the God who made us and fail to keep His great moral law. Anyway, that it is what I remember of what I was taught.
You and DB are awesome. I admire engineers and acknowledge the discipline. Very few people, like 3%, can do Calculus differentials.
Bragging. My father who worked on the Navaho. Yes, the 1954 group of twenty engineers from North American/Rockwell with slide rules who worked on the Navaho and who then triggered the space industry. It started with twenty and blossomed into the Mercury, Apollo, Space Shuttle and then the semi conductor industry.
I was studying philosophy at Berkeley in 1995 and kick myself for not buying Apple stock then, not learning code and not making field trips to Cupertino and looking for ways to be helpful.
You are exactly right.
Too many johnny-come-lately’s immagine anyone who disagrees with them are ignorant fools.
When I read something by Thomas Sowell that I disagree with, I stop and check myself and question whether I am the ignorant fool. Thomas Sowell has been the stalwart of conservative thought for many, many years. He is not infallible, but this ridiculous throwing everyone under the bus who does not see it my way is insane.
This piece had NO point. He didn’t say anything.
You have put together some detailed info on the TPP issue. While I do not agree with some of your opinions, I will admit that I have not fully formed my views on how a conservative, such as myself, should look at globalism.
There are certain opinions I hold in this area which, like your own, do not go along with the status quo. However, I fail to see this issue as being very relevant in the current election because it appears to me that everyone running could be categorized as a globalist.
Do you feel other candidates have a better or more conservative approach on this issue? And why?
Thinking about what you said, I ask, how do nations benefit from trade? By skimming something off of the top, I would guess. If it is possible for a nation to subsidize the cost of a good being sold, and still profit when the good is sold, is this not the key to economic prosperity? All we need is more subsidies and taxes? Isn’t reality a bit different?
Well, that’s the central disagreement right there. The free trade doctrine considers trade to be a free exchange between individual actors.
The other point of view is the collectivist perspective, seeing “trade” as something that happens between states, or as you phrase it, nations.
That’s just one of the reasons that the movement conservatives like Sowell and Levin are cool, to say the least, about Trump.
Thank you for your thoughtful and well documented post. I enjoyed reading the words that I myself have spoken, perhaps not in as clear a manner but nonetheless we share the obvious points.
IMHO, Rafael Cruz is playing the long game and his wife for what ever reason, perhaps even love, but I doubt it, has joined with him in what I feel is a very dangerous game. The illusion that he and his wife are “conservative” and have such a high regard for the constitution does not resonate with me and I believe that he has demonstrated openly, to my view, that he is a poser. The Mercer, Beck and Goldman Sachs alliance can only mean one thing; Globalist.
A long look at the father, his heritage and religious wantings and the suspicious loyalty of the mother to her son expressed always with a side glance to see if something or someone sinister is observing her, is, well, disconcerting.
Is it possible that GS cleverly put Heidi together with Rafael with ol man Bush’s blessing? Rafael does not appear to be an attractive option for a little blonde girl born and raised in America, so was it a contrived long game?
I believe and used the word Globalist to describe the downfall of the “middle class”; we are the middle class.
I don’t like it one bit, what say you?
I hear you and thank you for writing a well reasoned analysis - something that’s increasing becoming rare around here.
Trump seems to me like a toss of the dice. Everyone gets to a point where they don’t see a way forward without taking a big risk.
I’m just not there yet.
[Some of the most influential and admired conservative voices of the past 25 years are throwing up red flags all over the place regarding Trump.
Trump supporters are throwing them all under the bus without a second thought.
Strange stuff going on here.]
Yep!
Many of the newer sign-ups especially seem to hate conservative voices with a passion. Others just go along with the herd. Anyone who doesn’t follow the Trump herd is demonized and dismissed. It’s ridiculous.
There are some very unfreeper like people supporting Trump and attacking anything they don't agree with.
It gives me pause.
Thank you for the post polly.
Trump is the ONLY candidate who isn’t in somebody’s back pocket. Sadly, even Cruz is in the Wall Street pocket. In a way, I feel sorry for him, as he needed money, but if you sell your soul for money, maybe you should think about how virtuous you really are....
Cruz (R, Goldman Sachs)
TPA
No deportations
= NO sale!
Trade is a consequence of capitalism, there is nothing ‘free’ about it, there are costs involved in any trade. Article 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to re-coop the costs incurred by our government from the privilege of giving a foreign nation the ability to bring their products to our nation to sell. Right now, all these other nations expect us to absorb all the costs of trading with them, including the cost incurred in their foreign nation and these foreign nations do it by way of tariffs charged on every US item sold in their country.
When American companies leave the US and set up camp in one of these one-sided trade deal countries, America looses.
“Free trade” is a socialist/communist doctrine. Our founding fathers wrote & ratified a Constitution based upon a biblical “fair trade” doctrine. They were not against taxes. These men knew their bibles and the Word of God explicitly says that by the authority of God, the nations have a due diligence to collect taxes in the way of duties, tolls, and excises, so to support itself.
And there you have it, NOTHING is ever free, unless you like socialism/communism and even then it is not free, it most often costs you your morals, values & life.
^^This^^
For three successive presidential elections this violation has been pushed upon US with no popular descent, standing or legal options to redress allowed until Trump challenged them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.