Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz rules out 'deportation force' to boot undocumented immigrants
CNN ^ | 1/10/16 | Theodore Schleifer

Posted on 01/10/2016 6:40:18 AM PST by jimbo123

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Theoria

I can see Cruz’s point.

I know a woman who was the victim of spousal abuse. Her a$$hole of a husband (now a$$hole of an ex-husband) routinely beat the crap out of her. He was eventually arrested and pleaded down to a non-felony charge, and was given some slip-on-the-wrist punishment. I wouldn’t want that a$$hole anywhere near a firearm.

I know, it’s anecdotal. But I can tell you that woman agrees with Ted Cruz 1000%.

Some guys have been screwed over by spurious charges of domestic abuse. Some deserved the charges.

I think the issue should be addressed on a case-by-case basis.


21 posted on 01/10/2016 7:13:16 AM PST by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
If illegals already in America are refusing to leave, merely shutting off benefits or prohibiting their legal employment will hardly be sufficient incentive to send them packing to the border.

And considering that it is impossible to know how many potential sleeper cell terrorists are embedded with all those illegals, a specialized deportation force is the ONLY way to be sure that potential risks to our national security are REMOVED and removed promptly, and with confirmation.

"No, I don't intend to send jackboots to knock on your door and every door in America. That's not how we enforce the law for any crime"

In time of war, when national security has already been compromised and endangered, you can bet your sweet Texas ass it is, ok Ted?

Cruz just went down a couple of notches in my book.
22 posted on 01/10/2016 7:17:43 AM PST by mkjessup (What do terrorists, 'RATs and RINOs fear most? The prospect of President Donald J. Trump!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
"No, I don't intend to send jackboots to knock on your door and every door in America. That's not how we enforce the law for any crime"

Ted, tell that to the IRS.

23 posted on 01/10/2016 7:18:46 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Thank you very much for that!


24 posted on 01/10/2016 7:19:55 AM PST by mkjessup (What do terrorists, 'RATs and RINOs fear most? The prospect of President Donald J. Trump!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

The Branch Davidian’s could not be reached for comment.


25 posted on 01/10/2016 7:19:59 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

We already have two such forces - ICE and BP. Local and state are supposed to back them up. Make every agency would do it’s job and we won’t have this problem. If knocking on doors is what it takes, then start knocking. I’m sick and tired of all this mamsy pamsy ignoring the laws already on the books.


26 posted on 01/10/2016 7:23:37 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pookie18
Current law is obamacare and he wants to get rid of that one. I'm not picking on him, just that he had a opportunity to push for more gun ‘rights’.
27 posted on 01/10/2016 7:26:31 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: eastexsteve

Many school districts in Texas has stopped requiring a BC to enroll because it might upset illegals.


28 posted on 01/10/2016 7:26:58 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: anton

Yes. If you can’t work or get welfare, you and your family will starve. And that will vitiate the reason for your illegal immigration. Folks wanna eat.


29 posted on 01/10/2016 7:28:16 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: eastexsteve
Actually, you don’t need a deportation force. You do what the state of Oklahoma did. You make it illegal to hire them, transport them, and house them. And, you ENFORCE IT! You stop paying for their education and any other govt handout. When OK did this, an estimated 30k+ left the Oklahoma City area alone.

Yep. You just enforce the law. Make it the case that any illegal caught driving without license or insurance is held for deportation, and his car seized and sold (with revenue going to the seizing agency). Have ID's checked when they show up to enroll their kids or go on welfare. Any fake ID, and they are jailed and ineligible for bail.

Make it sufficiently unpleasant, and they will self-deport.

30 posted on 01/10/2016 7:28:51 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

This is so stupid.

We already have a “deportation force.”

It’s called ICE.

https://www.ice.gov/


31 posted on 01/10/2016 7:30:55 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anton
Only the criminals need to be escorted to the border or their homeland

Each and every one of them is a criminal hence the label illegal.

32 posted on 01/10/2016 7:32:04 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Ted using standard scare tactics of the Dims and GOPe. Outing himself.


33 posted on 01/10/2016 7:32:55 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
3rd-wave feminists jump for joy. When they consider that a guy that lies about his wealth before a girl sleeps with him to be rape, then the threshold for domestic abuse is likely not going to be very high.

If she yells at you and you yell back, that's domestic abuse.

We already have women who hurt themselves so they can get hubbie jailed on a fake abuse charge.

Look at how the US DOJ includes in their legal definition of "domestic violence":

Emotional Abuse: Undermining an individual's sense of self-worth and/or self-esteem is abusive. This may include, but is not limited to constant criticism, diminishing one's abilities, name-calling, or damaging one's relationship with his or her children.
Let's say your wife asks you "Does this dress make me look fat?"

If you foolishly answer "yes", then per the DOJ you are guilty of domestic violence.

34 posted on 01/10/2016 7:36:53 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Cool! Another government agency to do the job the others won't do!

power rangers photo: Power rangers Rangerrevamp.png
35 posted on 01/10/2016 7:37:11 AM PST by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

What’s wrong with that? When you’re convicted of a crime you lose lots of your rights. They can put you in jail. We don’t let felons be lawyers or teachers. Sex offenders are restricted by where they can live and work. Oftentimes felons can’t vote. If you’re convicted of a violent crime you should not be able to possess a gun. It’s the felons with guns who ruin it for all of us. Take away their guns. If they violate the restriction then put them back in jail where they belong. I think that if the guys Obama just sprung from federal prison got thrown back in jail for ten years because of gun possession then he would quickly reverse some of his support for gun control.


36 posted on 01/10/2016 7:39:29 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
'What’s wrong with that? When you’re convicted of a crime you lose lots of your rights'

Absurd. If you are too dangerous to have a gun you are too dangerous to be in society.

Rights are absolute, and within the structure of our government are not too be restricted.

37 posted on 01/10/2016 7:41:55 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

True & he has to do that via congress. Re gun control, he’ll undo all of 0’s related executive orders.


38 posted on 01/10/2016 7:44:08 AM PST by pookie18 (10 months until the general election...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Ted’s website is also available in SPANISH.

Go figure.

Hey Ted, want some chicken with that waffle???


39 posted on 01/10/2016 7:44:27 AM PST by datura (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

If you cut off their employment, and you cut them off from welfare, they will leave. Ordinary folks don’t like starving.

As for terrorists, we already have the FBI.

Sen. Cruz’ plan seems logical to me.

1. First, shut down the border. Make it secure. Stop the current flow of illegals.

2. Deny employment and welfare to those here illegally. If folks can’t work, if folks can’t get welfare, folks will starve. Folks who starve generally will move on to places they won’t starve.

3. Deport the known criminals as they come into contact with law enforcement.

4. Deport other illegal immigrants as they come into contact with government at any point.

5. Don’t let anyone back in who has broken our immigration laws.

The last point is important. Without it, we would encourage some folks to try to immigrate illegally. After all, there’s no long term penalty to it. And if we “expedited” folks back in, that would actually become a magnet for further illegal immigration, as those who immigrated illegally and were deported would have a jump over those who didn’t immigrate illegally and waited patiently for NON-EXPEDITED legal immigration.


40 posted on 01/10/2016 7:47:13 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson