Newsom Focuses on Guns Not Water

Townhall.com ^ | November 8, 2015 | Bruce Bialosky

[hattend]

Newsome is the next Governor and Harris is the next Senator? When was the election?

Yeah, they probably will win in this liberal wasteland but let’s not coronate them yet.

[Yosemitest]

Take the guns away from his security detail !

[Lisbon1940]

This used to be a Republican state. Somebody blew it.

[basil]

They can take my guns, one bullet at a time.

[rellimpank]

—this mutt and the people that vote for him are the root of all of Calimexifornia’s problems—

[Lazamataz]

California desperately needs that 10.0 Ricter earthquake. This place is effing insane.

[Yosemitest]

If he believe that guns aren;t the solution, then he should give up all firearms and have his security detail go without them !
But hypocrites like him, want to take away OUR firearms, because they cannot do to us what they want to do, was long as WE ARE ARMED !


“A traitor is everyone who does not agree with me.”
King George III


The United States Citizens KNOW that they're going to have to fight TYRANTS in their own government.
You can not protect life, without the ability to take life.

While you are WAITING for the police to respond, someone could be losing their life.
All people of a responsible age should be armed.

As EternalVigilance reminded us:

The Second Amendment IS Pro-Life.

"Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these:
First, a right to life;
Secondly, to liberty;
Thirdly, to property;
together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can.
These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation,
commonly called the first law of nature...
In short, it is the greatest absurdity to suppose it in the power of one, or any number of men, at the entering into society,
to renounce their essential natural rights, or the means of preserving those rights;
when the grand end of civil government, from the very nature of its institution,
is for the support, protection, and defence of those very rights;
the principal of which, as is before observed, are Life, Liberty, and Property.
If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any essential natural right,
the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation.
The right to freedom being the gift of God Almighty,
it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift
and voluntarily become a slave."




-- Samuel Adams, The Rights of the Colonists

Click here to read the 12 page pamphlet.

Let us NEVER FORGET THAT !

Let's subjugate them to OUR end game, DUST!
"COMPROMISE" is a DIRTY word!
People who study the Bible know that COMPROMISE almost always leads to destruction.


It's time to mock the "Gun Control" Zombies!
"Gun Control" is a firm grip, steady breathing, accurate aim (developed by lots of practice), and a slow trigger pull.


The Swiss have got it CORRECT !
We need to learn from the Swiss and implement their "gun control measures" here in the United States right now, today!
These laws are the ones we should shove into the "2nd Amendment Haters" faces.

" Today, military service for Swiss males is universal. At about age 20, every Swiss male goes through 118 consecutive days of recruit training in the Rekrutenschule. ...

Even before required training begins, young men and women may take optional courses with the Swiss army's M57 assault rifle.
They keep that gun at home for three months and receive six half-day training sessions.

From age 21 to 32, a Swiss man serves as a "frontline" troop in the Auszug, and devotes three weeks a year (in eight of the 12 years) to continued training.
From age 33 to 42, he serves in the Landwehr (like America's National Guard); every few years, he reports for two-week training periods.
Finally, from ages 43, to 50, he serves in the Landsturm; in this period, he only spends 13 days total in "home guard courses."

Over a soldier's career he also spends scattered days on mandatory equipment inspections and required target practice.
Thus, in a 30-year mandatory military career, a Swiss man only spends about one year in direct military service.
Following discharge from the regular army, men serve on reserve status until age 50 (55 for officers).

By the Federal Constitution of 1874, military servicemen are given their first equipment, clothing and arms.
After the first training period, conscripts must keep gun, ammunition and equipment an ihrem Wohnort ("in their homes") until the end of their term of service.

Today, enlisted men are issued M57 AUTOMATIC assault rifles and officers are given pistol.
Each reservist is issued 24 rounds of ammunition in sealed packs for emergency use.
(Contrary to Handgun Control's claim that "all ammunition must be accounted for," the emergency ammunition is the only ammo that requires accounting.)

After discharge from service, the man is given a bolt rifle free from registration or obligation.
Starting in the 1994, the government will GIVE ex-reservists assault rifles. Officers carry pistols rather than rifles and are given their pistols the end of their service.

When the government adopts a new infantry rifle, it sells the old ones to the public.

Reservists are encouraged to buy MILITARY ammunition
(7.5 and 5.6mm-5.56 mm in other countries-for rifles and 9 and 7.65 mm Luger for pistols)
which is sold AT COST by the government, for target practice .
Non-military ammunition for long-gun hunting and .22 Long Rifle (LR) ammo are not subsidized, but are subject to NO sales controls.
Non-military non-hunting ammunition more powerful than .22 LR (such as .38 Spl.) is registered at the time of sale.

Swiss military ammo must be registered IF bought at a private store, BUT NEED NOT BE REGISTERED IF bought at a range.
The nation's 3,000 shooting ranges sell the overwhelming majority of ammunition.
Technically, ammunition bought at the range must be used at the range, but the rule is barely known and almost never obeyed.

The army SELLS a variety of machine guns, submachine guns, anti-tank weapons, anti-aircraft guns, howitzers and cannons.
Purchasers of these weapons require an EASILY OBTAINED cantonal license, and the weapons are registered.
In a nation of six million people, there are at least two million guns, including 600,000 FULLY AUTOMATIC assault rifles, half a million pistols, and numerous machine guns.
Virtually every home has a gun.

Besides SUBSIDIZED military surplus, the Swiss can buy other firearms easily too.
While long guns require NO special purchase procedures, handguns are sold only to those with a Waffenerwerbsschien (purchase certificate) issued by a cantonal authority.
A certificate is issued to every applicant over 18 who is not a criminal or mentally infirm.

There are NO restrictions on the carrying of long guns.
About half the cantons have strict permit procedures for carrying handguns, and the other half have NO rules at all.
There is NO discernible difference in the crime rate between the cantons as a result of the different policies.

Thanks to a lawsuit brought by the Swiss gun lobby, semi-automatic rifles require NO PURCHASE PERMIT and are NOT registered by the government.
Thus, the ONLY long guns registered by the government are FULL AUTOMATICS."

The Swiss have got it CORRECT !
Let's adopt THEIR LAWS !

Remember:

The beauty of the Second Amendment is
that it will not be needed
until they TRY to take it.

Read Second Amendment: It’s Not About Hunting, IT'S ABOUT TYRANNY .

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

Corrupt dimwits like this guy can be readily shown up if there is someone to do it. In this case, if an organization like the NRA or other gun liberty group were to discreetly take a poll to find out what gun liberties Californians would most like to recover, then they could launch a popular initiative opposite to this anti-gun proposal.

Importantly, you should never let such pigs set the agenda, so the gun rights initiative is not the *opposite* of what he wants. Instead it is unto itself, restoring liberties that are already popular with the people.

That is, it would be a “bottom up” grassroots campaign, as opposed to his “top down” agenda. And that in itself is a big advantage.

However, are there enough sensible Californians left to support a gun liberty initiative?

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

[bubbacluck]

Any Twosome Newsome has great ambitions. I would easily believe he will try for the White House in the not too distant future.

[whinecountry]

Newsom is a real scumbag. Had an affair with the wife of his best friend and once showed up tipsy at a memorial for a slain police officer.

[unixfox]

I would easily believe he will try for the White House in the not too distant future.

Who will be the first liberal/Marxist newscaster to call him a "Rising Star?" Just like they did when Hussein was elected to the senate.

[vette6387]

You just have to wonder at the “conservative credentials” of Kimberly (the tit monster) Guilfoyle@FNC since she was married to Newsom during her “tenure” in San Francisco.

[Mastador1]

Fudgepacker, all you need to know.

[Oatka]

People will have to report lost or stolen firearms to local law enforcement.

Paving the way for the police to inspect your home "to ensure safe storage".

Also wipes out the "boating accident" excuse.

[Trillian]

There was an article in Wine Spectator recently about him. All I could think of was ‘Any Twosome Newsome’. Two pages after that article was a recipe for fudge, which made me laugh more.

[Red in Blue PA]

[Seaplaner]

California's population has doubled, we have lost water from the Colorado River to neighboring states, we have spent a fortune on water bonds to no avail, but our leaders want to build a choo-choo train down the middle of the state for no one to use and further restrict gun rights to little benefit.

The "choo-choo" is unlikely to ever be completed; and, one suspects that this might even be the real plan.

As a native of the once Golden State, I'm surprised so many good Cali citizens (especially business owners and gun owners) have not yet moved away.

.

[dennisw]

Can’t we get a person of colors into this office and get rid of this honky dumbass once and for all? Aren’t Mexicans/Hispanics the largest group there now? How come this useless white boy isn’t getting out of the way and letting an affirmative action Mexican become California’s next governor?