Posted on 10/23/2015 3:08:04 AM PDT by Biggirl
Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's testimony yesterday before the congressional committee formed to investigate the deadly Benghazi debacle that she allowed to happen and then tried to cover up can be summed up in two words: she lied.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
Also a factor is that the alternative Repubbies were not offering too much of an alternative candidate(s) to switch sides in the uni-party.
Hoping 2016 is in stark contrast to put a dent in that Dem lovefest.
PS— Hellary is not criticizing Barrycare—she can be hit on the campaign with this damage to America.
IIRC I thought I remember her blaming the video at the hanger too when the bodies of our 4 Americans were brought home.
You do. She did.
As I mentioned its all Susan Rice’s fault about pushing the meme of that video. It all her fault—every bit of it. /sc
How can that be? How could people not see the lies? It was right there in black and white in her own emails.
They dont care.
Dem liars are more equal than other liars.
If a favored leftist claims the sun rises in the north and sets in the Gobi Desert then is later called on it and says he didn’t say it, no amount of video and audio and no number of witnesses can change the now immutable fact that the leftist didn’t lie. People will both remember what he said about the sun and believe that he didn’t lie and that claims that he did lie are persecution.
I believe that if she is not actually indicted she will certainly be elected. If she is indicted her chances of being elected are only diminished and not a lot. Single women, Negros, immigrants of all stripes except for Vietnamese and Cubans will vote for her and will come out in larger than normal percentages. And Soros counts the votes from a number of states. And states will not be permitted to verify legitimacy of voters at the polls or turn them away just because someone recognizes them as having voted already several times.I expect federal inspectors to be at all the polling stations in “unreliable” states.
if elected, will she be alive to be inaugurated?
That is the eality . Even as the networks and major publications lose readership and are generally derided people still believe that. Or they believe that if they didn't hear it from the MSM it doesn't matter. Truth is not so important as is Official Truth.
In the video you link, there is no specific tie of the video to the attack, just a statement that the video has caused outbreaks of protest and violence around the world. The Benghazi attack is mentioned tendentiously, but it isn’t directly tied to the video by Clinton in this video.
I watched it several times and do not see what you are claiming.
I’m pretty sure there is other video of her doing what you claim (tying Benghazi to the video), but this one doesn’t appear to be it.
Yes, that is the damning video!
Stupid or apathetic, the sheeple will vote for this raving lunatic, because she will promise them the moon.
About the video posted at post #6....
I learned something yesterday while watching the hearing on a live feed.
In the above linked video, Hillary said, “I also want to take a minute to address the video circulating on the Internet that has led to these protests in a number of countries.” Then she goes on to talk about the video saying America had nothing to do with it and we have tolerance, blah, blah, blah.
So yesterday when questioned about the fact that she blamed the Benghazi attack on the video, she said that No, she only referred to a video that was causing riots in a number of places, but no where did she say it was the cause of the Benghazi attack.
Do you see how carefully crafted her LIES are. She worded the original statement so that everyone hearing it would think that the video caused the Benghazi attack. News media would even say it, and she never corrected them. Now she can go back to the original statement, point to it and say, “I never said that the video cause this particular attack.”
This kind of planned deception is a hallmark of this evil woman. She can say, for instance, “I didn’t even have a computer on my desk at the State Department.” But perhaps she had a computer available on a credenza behind her desk, an arrangement seen in many fancy offices, but many people will think the lack of emails the year of the attack was because she had no computer in her office, not the truth that she deleted them. She can say, “Sidney Blumenthal was not my adviser.” and when asked about the many emails he sent to her, she could claim they were “unsolicited”, leading us to think that she didn’t pay any attention to them so in essence they didn’t “exist.
And the lies go on and on.....
Yes sir. see post 38 in this thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.