Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

--the usual garbage---
1 posted on 10/15/2015 4:58:51 PM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank

So many people are dumber than soap………..


2 posted on 10/15/2015 5:00:21 PM PDT by basil ( God bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

This one insists that a sign will make a difference. These people are insane.


3 posted on 10/15/2015 5:02:27 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

It actually isnt more guns.

These people are already gun owners, they already have their guns. They just cant carry them in certain places. Its actually not going to result in any extra guns that are not already owned, in society.


5 posted on 10/15/2015 5:11:19 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Liberal logic:

We’ve banned guns in campus buildings, that will handle these shootings.

(yet another shooting happens)

You know, we really need to expand these gun bans, as they apparently aren’t effective enough.

(yet another shooting happens)

We really should ban guns in student cars and on campus.

(yet another shooting happens)

What we really need is to ban any gun from coming within 1,000 feet of a school!

JUST like their idiotic ‘social net’, a program has zero positive results to show, many many examples of negative results, but like always, the liberal answer is to double down on failed policy.


6 posted on 10/15/2015 5:14:45 PM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Let’s just see how it works: we’ve done away with the concealed carry ban on campuses in Texas, and in a coupla years we’ll see how that works out.

That same people making dire predictions about campus concealed carry made similar dire predictions about public concealed carry over the past decades, and you know what?
They were wrong.
Crime has dropped enormously - in places where the bad guys know their “victims” might shoot back...


7 posted on 10/15/2015 5:20:42 PM PDT by Redbob (#BlackCoffeeMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

If more guns are the problem, why do they call the cops when a shooting occurs? The guns that they carry will only make the situation worse.


8 posted on 10/15/2015 5:25:58 PM PDT by Bob (No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not accomplishments; they're jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

—ping—


9 posted on 10/15/2015 5:28:48 PM PDT by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Reminds me of when people argue in favor of Communism, saying that it merely hasn’t been “done correctly”. How many more thousands have to die on the streets of Stupidity and Ignorance until something is done to prevent these atrocities? After all, insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Something must be changed. Hanging onto the same outmoded and nonsensical policies will accomplish nothing except sending innocent people to the grave.


10 posted on 10/15/2015 5:34:32 PM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("There's a time to preach and a time to fight." -John Peter Muhlenberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

SSDD. The idiots actually believe simply possessing a firearm on a school campus magically makes you a killer. Despite all evidence to the contrary, “gun free zones” don’t stop mass murders.


12 posted on 10/15/2015 6:01:59 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

I would like to see the day when a suspect enters a college classroom and shoots at the professor and 6 students draw their handguns and kill the suspect-— 5 center mass and 1 in the shoulder and then the student who only hit the shoulder is sent to the college basement firing range for a couple of days of shooting practice.

As Archie Bunker said. “Arm all the passengers on an airplane with guns to end sky jacking.”


13 posted on 10/15/2015 6:32:44 PM PDT by Mark (Obama Care is now DEMOCRAT CARE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

So then ask them why those with guns come in and shoot up the place?


14 posted on 10/15/2015 6:38:23 PM PDT by SkyDancer ("Nobody Said I Was Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
The greater risk is that more arms means more shootings and more deaths.

The author assumes we will take this at face value without any evidence to support it.

15 posted on 10/15/2015 6:42:22 PM PDT by dartuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
Tomorrow, Maine's Constitutional Carry law goes into effect. Even today, 75% of the US population lives in a state where concealed carry is not permitted at all, or permits are required to be issued to non-felons ("shall issue").

To repeat:

75%

of Americans live in a place they can carry, if they are not convicted felons.

We are winning. These stupid newspaper hoplophobes are LOSING.

17 posted on 10/15/2015 7:10:33 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank; onyx; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; ...

JS takes the side of the people who want to keep our students sitting ducks, natuarly. Thanks for the ping rellimpank. I’m over my posting limit (actually reading limit) of the Journal Sentinel for the month already, so I need everone’s help in calling attention to articles of Wisconsin interest that they’ve already posted from that site. I can still get in from my Office IP address, but my home address is shut down. Thanks.

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.


19 posted on 10/15/2015 11:44:47 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

I think anyone who disarms their people by rule should be held criminally liable if and when anyone violates the gun ban and shoots up the place.


20 posted on 10/15/2015 11:53:04 PM PDT by MortMan (The rule of law is now the law of rulings - Judicial, IRS, EPA...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

fta... And it’s fantastical to think that lightly trained citizens packing guns will either prevent or alter the path of a determined shooter.
************************************
The gangstas in Chicago and elsewhere seem to do quite well in being able to shoot to kill without having undergone extensive training.


21 posted on 10/15/2015 11:53:24 PM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

Well, If I was a crazy brain dead Liberal with a grudge, I’m sure a Sign would work if I was Literate. Hope it isn’t written in Cursive though, that could be a problem.

I think I’d go with Molotov Cocktails instead. Then I can blame Big Oil, Big Bottle, Big Rag and Big Matches for my Crime Spree.


22 posted on 10/15/2015 11:59:34 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank

“lightly trained citizens”; hhhmmm, I wonder how many of those lightly trained citizens are already graduates of multiple tours in the Sand Box?
A pretty good percentage I would bet.


23 posted on 10/16/2015 12:42:02 AM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
Yeah. Same old groveling liberal line:

"More Guns=More Crime"

I go with Lott's proactive bumper sticker:

"More Guns=Less Crime"

Mass shooters always choose Target-Rich Environments (gun-free zones): Schools, theaters, malls, MacDonalds, etc.

I simply cannot understand why simps like these continue to cling to the passive-personality model that only invites and aggravates terroristic acts.

24 posted on 10/16/2015 2:14:03 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rellimpank
And it's fantastical to think that lightly trained citizens packing guns will either prevent or alter the path of a determined shooter. The greater risk is that more arms means more shootings and more deaths. And that's why a bill to allow guns inside university buildings in Wisconsin is such a bad idea.

Because cowering in a corner and throwing office items (tape dispensers/staplers, etc.) is so much more effective at deterring said "determined shooter" than "lightly trained" citizens packing heat....

The really scary part is that these folks don't have a clue how nuts they are......and they are walking free among us.

25 posted on 10/16/2015 4:09:56 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson