Posted on 10/12/2015 6:50:37 AM PDT by Kaslin
Editor's Note: The following column is satire.
To the limited extent they actually do, have you ever wondered how so-called progressives think? The progressive mind lets call it, Progressy collectively hovers, like the Hindenburg, in that fantastical realm, that manmade utopia in waiting, that fundamentally transformed world that might only be, if …
Hitler got it mostly wrong, Stalin, somewhat right, and Mao, with his Great Leap Forward, warmer still. Marx and Engels were red-hot-close, but, they, too, missed the mark, if only by an inch. Todays hipper, gentler, more progressivish progressives are confident that, if wed only give them another shot, theyd finally get right what the others got wrong.
Pinky swear.
Then again, à la Barack Obama and true to form, since theres no way in hot hell any rational person will give them that shot, theyll just take it anyway.
I recently caught up with Progressy, iPhone in hand and sipping a Cinnamon Dolce Latte at a packed SoHo Starbucks between angry and aimlessly incoherent protests against the evil corporatocracy. He/she/ze/it graciously agreed to sit down and give me a brief, though refreshingly unguarded, interview.
MB: The Declaration of Independence is Americas founding document. Tell me what you think of it.
Progressy: Its crap. Its not worth the parchment its written on. Selfish nonsense about unalienable rights given by some creator who fashioned mankind in his own image is the stuff of grand superstition. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Try choice, equality and the pursuit of pleasure. Rights come from government, not some imaginary god. Ideas about pre-eminent worth of the individual have, over the years, simply proven too harmful in efforts to advance the greater good of the collective in all its identifiable, divisible and perpetually put-upon subgroups. The Declarations sister document, the U.S. Constitution, has to go as well. Theyre both outdated and completely at odds with progressive thought. As such, they must be circumvented, if not completely ignored, at every opportunity.
MB: The term gender neutrality is in the news a lot lately. Care to comment?
Progressy: Is a wild bear Catholic? Antiquated notions of traditional marriage and the nuclear family, along with the biblical canard that children should honor their father and mother, are totally problematic on several counts. First, such binary and heterosexist expressions are offensive and discriminatory on their face. In a sexually androgynous world with manifold sexual orientations, gender identities and familial make-ups, exclusive language like father or mother, husband or wife, are an affront to overall inclusivity and gender neutrality. In an effort to ensure the genderless society that fairness demands, and to fully safeguard unconditional sexual equality, these terms, along with mom and dad, must be abolished.
MB: The Supreme Court has opined that gay marriage is now a constitutional right. But studies show conclusively that kids do better with both, er, an, um with a biologically male and a biologically female parent. Dont kids deserve whats best for them?
Progressy: No! This isnt about kids and whats best for them! This is about LGBTQQIAAP rights! Its about fundamental fairness. The historical nuclear family structure supposes some sort of paternal hierarchy that belittles the child and violates its right to self-determination particularly when it comes to matters of sex and sexuality. Christianist moralism and dogmatism have, for far too long, forced children to suppress their inborn polysexuality, discouraging childhood sexual experimentation and exploration with members of the vast rainbow of gender identities and sexual orientations or, for that matter, all identities and orientations at once. Furthermore, such repressive parental constraints deter intergenerational intimacy. As firmly established by scientific and academic consensus, adult-child romance offers men, women and children alike a rich opportunity for sensual growth. After centuries of persecution and knee-jerk criminal prosecution of minor-attracted persons, such sexual relationships are being shown to both nurture and expand childrens physical and emotional horizons and, thusly, should be encouraged. Ultimately, religiously based patriarchy and parentally forced sexual repression and closed-minded moralizing and bigotry have proven responsible for a host of societal ails. Its draconian moralism versus gentle relativism; closed-minded intolerance versus tolerance and love. Quite naturally, and in the values-neutral world of the 21st century, love wins!
MB: Wow. Im just not really sure how to even respond to that. Moving on: Whats next for marriage equality?
Progressy: Now that the same-sex marriage battle is ending and marriage equality is becoming recognized worldwide, we expect things to quickly change for the better. To ensure full marriage equality, it logically follows that all other arbitrary and discriminatory restrictions placed on marriage should be lifted and, believe me, they will. At long last we will one day soon have a world that fully recognizes civil rights for all sexual minorities. Polygamous, incestuous and intergenerational love will be legalized, even celebrated. LGBTQQIAAP people will finally achieve full sexual liberation at the global scale.
MB: Some say that the main goal of progressives was never marriage equality, but, rather, to undermine the very institutions of marriage and family. How do you respond to them?
Progressy: Well, duh. The very idea of marriage and family is offensive and obsolete. The whole point of marriage equality is to faze them out to attack the patriarchy. You mentioned studies. Well, studies have shown that traditional marriage and the nuclear family structure have the harmful effect of both challenging and diminishing government authority. If anything and everything, any combination of people or peoples, young, old, male, female, related, unrelated, two to 100, can constitute marriage and family, then what need will there be for marriage and family at all? Since original marriage, traditional marriage, so clearly undermines progressive state authority, it stands to follow that the family must be rendered meaningless.
The idea has always been for progressive government to replace family outright. Redefining the family into oblivion is just one means to establish widespread dependency on the government. We never gave two flips about marriage equality. It was never about having the white picket fence, its always been about burning down the white picket fence. Why honor ones father and mother, after all, when one has the government? What need is there? Government merits both honor and respect. Not only does the traditional family provide little utility for the collective, it affirmatively undercuts respect for state authority. The government provides security. The government provides emotional stability. The government provides for each and every conceivable need. Therefore, the government is, effectively, both father and mother. The government is family. Honor thy father and mother? Ha! Forget it. One day soon the progressive slogan, Children, honor thy government will be found posted throughout the halls of every public school. Weve already done a bang up job removing prayer and any reference to God. Now its time to replace them. Progressive government is god.
MB: OK, Progressy, thanks for your time today. Its been illuminating. Looking forward to the anarchy. Happy world domination.
It may be satire but I think there’s a lot of truth there ragarding how the Proggy’s think.
Great article-—but it is hard to read what is in the Mind of these evil, irrational, useful idiots.
They are devoid of Reason. (Our laws HAVE to be “Right Reason” but they NOW reflect the above, vile, irrational mind, which is unconstitutional)
They are just godless irrational animals, as Marx and Fichte knew they had to be, to make them into the necessary non-thinking “happy slaves” like the obamaphone lady. Just controlled by Lust and advocating dehumanizing, vile, irrational use of human beings.
Removal of Right Reason from Just Law is unconstitutional. Removing Virtue from a Just Law makes it an oxymoron——irrational. Both—irrational “Law” and promotion of Vice in a “Just Law” is “null and void”.
We have to RECLAIM Words and Language and Reason and Virtue.....and we do it by EDUCATION and returning to Classical Education and local control of all schools, and get federal govt. OUT of brainwashing our children.
No curricula developed post-1920 unless it is rigorous Classical and Christian Worldview. No other worldview (Marxist/muslim/satanist, hinduism/pantheism, etc) is compatible with Natural Law Theory and Individualism which is the basis of Freedom and Individual Natural Rights from God which is the First Principles embedded into our Constitution.
Xe/It forgot to mention the most recent atrocity discovered by Canadian feminists... Fart Rape!
https://thewaterpipe.wordpress.com/2013/12/22/can-a-fart-be-misogynist/
Women are being oppressed and intimidated by male flatulence! You can’t make this stuff up.
Our universities are failing because they take stupid stuff like this seriously, and enable obnoxious, spoiled twits like this to mouth off their inane ideas. While other countries on earth will study math and science, our kids will be encouraged to learn “diversity studies” or some such rot.
Satire sure but awfully like sticking your head in a rain barrel and having a discussion with the frog at the bottom.
Regards,
GtG
faze?
Logic is Western Civ and needs to be rejected by all.
New tag line.
From Merriam Webster dictionary.com
Satire: a way of using humor to show that someone or something is foolish, weak, bad, etc. : humor that shows the weaknesses or bad qualities of a person, government, society, etc.
I doubt that “progressives” are even able to think. Especially not with their pea-sized brains
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.