Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The White House Backs Down On Phone Encryption
TechCrunch ^ | October 10, 2015 | by Cat Zakrzewski

Posted on 10/10/2015 9:50:27 PM PDT by Swordmaker

In a victory for tech firms, the Obama administration will not force firms to breach the security of their products in order to provide information to law enforcement.

The decision comes after a year after encryption introduced on iPhones and some Android phones sparked a debate between law enforcement and tech companies over access to phone data. With iOS 8, most data stored on the phone and communications over services like iMessage were encrypted in a way that only users could access it — not even Apple could.

FBI director James Comey then sounded the alarm that phone encryption would prevent law enforcement from accessing crucial information, warning “going dark” would derail crucial investigations. However technologists argued creating a so-called “back door” for law enforcement would create a security vulnerability that could be exploited by hackers and spies.

Comey signaled the administration was backing down in a Congressional hearing this week when he said the White House would not seek legislation to require companies to provide so-called “back doors” for law enforcement officials to access encrypted data. But on Saturday the New York Times reported the White House’s position goes even further. The White House will continue to require tech companies to cooperate with law enforcement, but the administration will not require them to exploit the security of their own products.

Intelligence agencies and law enforcement will now be reliant on work arounds for encryption. They can seek data backed up to the cloud or unencrypted forms of communication through service providers, such as records of phone calls. They can also attempt to compel phone owners to turn over their passcodes.

The White House’s position represents a victory for privacy advocates in the wake of the disclosures of government contractor Edward Snowden about the surveillance practices of the National Security Agency.

But the decision will likely draw anger from intelligence agencies as well as some lawmakers. Just on Thursday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley wrote a letter to the White House criticizing it for not taking a strong stance on encryption.

Still the New York Times report says tech firms do not think the administration has done enough. They are calling for the White House to release a clear statement it can bring to China and Europe, where government officials are threatening to ban encrypted devices or require companies to provide back door access.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apple; applepinglist; dhs; encryption; iphone; nsa; phoneencryption; privacy

1 posted on 10/10/2015 9:50:27 PM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dayglored; ThunderSleeps; ShadowAce; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; ...
Obama and Federal Law Enforcement is backing off its efforts to get phone and tablet manufacturers to provide back-doors into their devices, or to help law enforcement agencies to compromise the security of such devices. This is a clear victory for Privacy Advocates and Apple. — PING!

Ping to dayglored; thundersleeps; and Shadow Ace for their ping lists.


Mobile Device Legal Privacy
Ping!

The Latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword “ApplePingList” on Freerepublic’s Search.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

2 posted on 10/10/2015 9:56:31 PM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

No Moe Back Door I guess!

Shoot, whats a BamBoy to do??


3 posted on 10/10/2015 10:28:08 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

WOOT WOOT ;^)


4 posted on 10/10/2015 10:30:29 PM PDT by BullDog108 (A Smith & Wesson beats four aces!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

They will encourage them to with incentives and dropping ny trumped up current irs investigations.


5 posted on 10/10/2015 11:13:51 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Judge declines to order Apple to disable security on device seized by U.S.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3347268/posts


6 posted on 10/10/2015 11:55:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Cat, it didn’t back down.

It’ll still find a way to break the law. Haven’t you been watching Valerie and her charge for the last seven years?


7 posted on 10/11/2015 3:51:16 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
"The White House will continue to require tech companies to cooperate with law enforcement, but the administration will not require them to exploit the security of their own products."

He probably means "undermine", not "exploit". The government (and other bad guys) exploit the insecurity of products. I hope by "cooperate" he means comply with ordinary warrants (not FISA). The government has all the authority they need in the 4th amendment as many commenters have pointed out.

8 posted on 10/11/2015 6:02:27 AM PDT by palmer (Net "neutrality" = Obama turning the internet over to foreign enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

no more illegal Bandwidth Tapping..PERIOD!


9 posted on 10/11/2015 12:36:28 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson