THE BIG PICTURE: A PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE OF FIRST PRINCIPLES

I’ve always been a “big picture” kinda guy. I would rather read a general overview of history rather than a detailed analysis of the Battle of the Bulge. I would prefer reading a concise, insightful summary of human nature rather than the most in-depth study of child development. I would prefer watching a Discovery Channel program on The Big Bang than one on the solar system. For me, the Big Picture is just more fun to think about than the little stuff.

My approach to the presidential debates is no different. Our presidentiaI debates focus on specific issues like immigration reform, assault rifles, easy versus tight money, climate change, a woman’s right to choose, and transgender rights. And so presidential debates almost always bore me to tears. I’m not suggesting that these issues are neither important nor timely. Indeed they are. They are especially important to special interest groups. The responses are well-rehearsed and, of course, tailored to maximize votes and campaign donations.

So, I would really relish a presidential debate on what I call “First Principles”, things like liberty, natural rights, what is mine and what is thine. I would include questions on founding principles and the role of the federal government. Why? Well, as I said, I’m a big picture kinda guy, and I believe answers to questions of one’s core philosophical beliefs tend to reveal as much about a person’s soul as his intellect.

Whether we realize it or not, we all have a philosophy, a set of guiding principles upon which we act, including a little self-delusion and hypocrisy. One’s philosophy may be good or evil, rational or irrational. Both the criminal and the choir-boy have a philosophy, as do the village parson and the Mafia don. Nearly all of us fall somewhere in the great middle, neither sinners nor saints. We’re flawed, but not fatally so.

All of our actions, every decision we make or avoid, presupposes a personal philosophy. It is as singular and unique as our DNA or our fingerprints. It is that amalgam of virtues and values that defines who we are and what we are made of. Philosophy is identity; it is our lodestar. And so it goes for presidential candidates. As such, we should be focused like a laser on the candidates’ fundamental philosophy. For it is their philosophy, their virtues and values, their moral compass, that will guide their every decision.

So, if given the opportunity to be a presidential debate moderator, or at least prepare a list of questions for a presidential debate, what would they be:

First, a series of questions on the fundamental nature of liberty. • Is liberty an axiomatic, transcendental pre-condition of universal happiness and justice, or just another political ideology? • Is liberty a moral imperative? • Is it a means or an end? • Is liberty the province of the privileged few which allows them to exploit the less fortunate, or a universal human aspiration which allows all us to realize our highest potential? • Would you define liberty as freedom from want, freedom from responsibility, or freedom from compulsion?

• Was the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and subsequent ratification the realization of the ideals so sublimely articulated in the Declaration, or a well-orchestrated coup designed to benefit powerful special interests? Did the constitution do justice to those who paid the ultimate price during the War, or did it betray them? • Did it advance the promises of the Enlightenment or throw them under a bus?

Finally, a series of questions to determine where the candidates stand on the fundamental role government.

• Is the government supposed to be a “night watchman” or a “nanny?” • Do you believe that a government which consistently exceeds its constitutional limitations forfeits any claims to legitimacy? • Would you support a constitutional amendment giving states the right of secession by popular means? • Would you support scrapping the constitution and reverting to the Articles of Confederation?

I believe a candidate’s responses to these questions would be a lot more interesting and revealing of the candidates. The answers to these questions should be required of every presidential candidate.

I believe both Joe Biden and Hillary would have trouble understanding these questions.

Yeb might be able to answer them, but since he would answer in Spanish, I would have trouble understanding him.

I’ve been in Trump’s corner early.
Having said that, the real irony here is, the Democrats and Bush, McCain, Boehner, et al., they want to get rid of Trump, so they have tried throwing all this crap at him.

How would they really do it? What would work?
Think back the Fox debate. It was a circus.
Think about Trump’s performance.
OK.

If they want to make Trump plummet in the polls all they must do is ... put straight-up questions to him.
But we don’t want them doing this until Cruz is coat-tailed into a strong second place.

You are clearly intelligent and I’m not saying the candidates are simple but I think these questions need to be dumbed down a little so both the candidates and the audience understand them clearly.

JMHO

Great post about how to change the way politics is done, Huck. I saw some pundit say that with so many big name candidates this time, there's something for everyone. Yet none of these candidates appear to meet my minimum criteria. I voted for fellow FReeper EternalVigilance last time. He was on the ballot in California, and write-in votes for him were tallied in enough states to allow him to win the Electoral College (if he had gotten enough votes). The prior election, my vote went to a fellow I first heard speak at a FreeRepublic rally on the Mall in DC urging Clinton impeachment -- Alan Keyes. I we don't see candidates that even come close to representing our views on first principes, then we ought to do what we can to raise such candidates up. EternalVigilance continues to moderate a political conference call every Tuesday and Thursday night starting at 9pm ET. 712-432-3566 – passcode 340794#

These are real town hall-style calls, and we've had hundreds of candidates sit in the "hot seat" over the years, taking questions from all comers. All of good will are welcome!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.