[Cheerio]

Hillary Clinton later offering up suggestions on Twitter, tweeting: “How about “babies,” “children,” or “American citizens?” She’s clearly seizing the Republican battle which, if Donald Trump has his way, won’t end anytime soon.

[Eddie01]

Tom is in full panic mold.

[LS]

This is so funny. Trump uses the term, which a reporter objects to, and he tells the reporter to pound sand. Jeb uses the term, then begins waffling and apologizing, and is pilloried. Lessee, which approach works better?

[grania]

Trump has us fighting back on PC speech, which is an assault on our thought process and the sharing of ideas. Anchor Babies is not offensive, and if it is to some folks who find fault in everything, SO WHAT?

[Texas Eagle]

A) Whe the hell knew who Tom Llamas was before the contrived outrage?

B) Who the hell is Tom Llamas?

[King Moonracer]

How about welfare enablement spawn.

[Texas Eagle]

Fine. I'm all for our candidates taking the time to explain what an anchor baby is.

I'm willing to bet there's a hugh segment of our population who don't know. Once they are informed that money is being taken out of their pockets to give to someone who else who just stepped into this country, it might open their eyes as to what has been going on.

Might.

[boycott]

We need a term for the muzzie “refugees” being brought over here too. How about muzzie bombs or islam bombs?

Europe is in current meltdown crisis because of all the muslims being dumped on them. If we believe nations are making it impossible for them to live, we need to take the battle over there instead of brining here. And they need to stand up and fight for their own countries.

[isthisnickcool]

I figure we are about 2 weeks away from hearing “wetback’ used again.

[Blue Turtle]

If only he’d be this upset at planned parenthood chopping up babies...

[Sir Napsalot]

Keep this up.

The networks don’t realize MORE and MORE people are leaving their PC plantation.

It’ll end up the same as people laughed at the SJWs to their face at (after) the GamersGate.

[Cheerio]

I have yet to hear anyone tell us how the Consitution got changed - Levis has been all over this and he is the one bringing up the question - "How did this policy come about?".

No one seems to know after you look at the original amendment, the discussions that took place upon proposing and passing that amendment, and all court cases since.

It is almost as if the change just came through the Lame Stream Media, and yet many lawyers argue the courts have interpreted it to mean what they say it means.

[G Larry]

Answer should be:

“Anchor Babies?”

Look, just because you’re a news “anchor”, don’t get your panties in wad...

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

Maybe we should start calling him “Jeb ‘Mister Boombastic’ Bush”.

[BigCinBigD]

Okay Tom Tom. How about Anchor Wetbacks?

[FlingWingFlyer]

If the illegals are offended when their offspring are referred to as anchor babies, they’d really be offended if they were Americans whose babies are referred to as “tissue mass” that is “harvested”.

[JPG]

--“How about “babies.”

[Leep]

Bombastically speaking, I prefer ‘Illegal fetuses’.

Also, support deportiing all leftist Anchormen and Anchorwomen!

[Calpublican]

Let’s control language but not the behavior of Planned Parenthood.

If we get everyone to say the right thing, it doesn’t matter what we do.

[utax]

is Tom LlameA$$ an anchor baby?

[catnipman]

“ABC’s Tom Llamas Still Upset over ‘Anchor Baby’ Term?

Perhaps he should cover his ears with his hands and close his eyes and go “Na, na, na, na, na, na ...” while he interviews people so as to avoid being offended by any of their answers to their questions.

Better yet, just to be completely safe from being offended, he should just quit the biz all together.