Should we follow laws that go against the US Constitution and even the word of GOD? No.
So exactly what is it Sessions, Dead Horse or Live Boy?
wow, Sessions just sank 50% in my estimation
How are those who “followed the law” as interpreted in the Dred Scott decision remembered by history?
IOW - appease the Yankee invader!
Disgusting.
No. He should say it for what it is. The decision is invalid since 2 justices should have recused themselves since they blatantly showed partiality prior to the case. If this was going to be a ‘landmark’, scotus should have treated it like one. The other seven justices should have demanded recusal of Kagan and Ginsberg.
Sessions is right.
If Alabama were to get out of the business of defining and regulating marriage, and return private relationships to the sphere of what is private and personal, then the issue of the Outrageous decision by the Supreme Court would instantly be moot.
But once states have the power to define and regulate something they would almost rather die than give up that power. Now that power may destroy far more liberty than it grants.
The Christians can still get united together in HOLY MATRIMONY in the churches.
Problem solved.
Can't blame the normal people for this. We didn't screw up marriage - the homosexuals did. Blame them.
And another GOP Cave Monkey does what the GOP does best: CAVES. And this, from a so-called Conservative??? Pfffffft. He’s worthless, just like the rest of them.
What "law" would that be? From what legislative process?
What does “Follow the law” mean. Are we all gay now?
Did the congress pass a law?
When did we repeal the 10th amendment?
With all due respect to Senator Sessions, he evidently doesn’t understand the intent or the limits of the 14th Amendment (14A) as constitutional lawmakers had intended for it to be understood where gay “marriage” is concerned. So he is another good example why the 17th Amendment needs to be repealed.
Note that since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay marriage that activist justices actually had no enumerated gay marriage protections to apply to the states as required by 14A.
Activist justices did the same thing when they legalized non-enumerated “right” to have an abortion from the bench imo.
But what’s worse, activist justices who pervert the Constitution or citizens who don’t read the Constitution so that they are clueless when justices are lying to them about what the Constitution says?
The Constitution is the law. The decision of the Supreme Court is a ruling.
We have so few voices - and it appears just lost one. These guys have been doing politics for so many years, what is it the newbie president brought that has changed?
Don’t go wobbly now, Jeff.
Hey, Jeff—Only chumps follow the law anymore.