Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GIdget2004

No. He should say it for what it is. The decision is invalid since 2 justices should have recused themselves since they blatantly showed partiality prior to the case. If this was going to be a ‘landmark’, scotus should have treated it like one. The other seven justices should have demanded recusal of Kagan and Ginsberg.


9 posted on 07/01/2015 9:00:31 AM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TMA62

Sessions is a realist. We have lost this battle. There are not enough people really against this mess. Save our fire for the immigration issue. That is what will make or break the future of the country.


11 posted on 07/01/2015 9:05:16 AM PDT by Himyar (Sessions: the only real man in D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson