Posted on 06/24/2015 3:16:36 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
If it seems to you that the Left has, collectively, lost its damned mind as the curtain rises on the last act of the Obama administration, you are not imagining things. Barack Obama has been extraordinarily successful in his desire to — what was that phrase? — fundamentally transform the country, but the metamorphosis is nonetheless a good deal less than his congregation wanted and expected. We may have gone from being up to our knees in welfare-statism to being up to our hips in it, and from having a bushel of banana-republic corruption and incompetence to having a bushel and a peck of it, but the United States of America remains, to the Left’s dismay, plainly recognizable as herself beneath the muck.
Ergo, madness and rage.
We have seen an extraordinary outburst of genuine extremism — and genuine authoritarianism — in the past several months, and it will no doubt grow more intense as we approach the constitutional dethroning of the mock messiah to whom our progressive friends literally sang hymns of praise and swore oaths of allegiance. (“I pledge to be a servant to our president” — recall all that sieg heil creepiness.) There is an unmistakable stink of desperation about this, as though the Left intuits what the Right dares not hope: that the coming few months may in fact see progressivism’s cultural high-water mark for this generation.
If there is desperation, it probably is because the Left is starting to suspect that the permanent Democratic majority it keeps promising itself may yet fail to materialize. The Democrats won two resounding White House victories but can hardly win a majority in a state legislature (seven out of ten today are Republican-controlled) or a governorship (the Democrats are down to 18) to save their lives, while Republicans are holding their strongest position in Congress since the days of Herbert Hoover. The Democrats have calculated that their best bet in 2016 is Hillary Rodham Clinton, that tragic bag of appetites who couldn’t close the deal in the primary last time around. “Vote for me, I’m a lady” isn’t what they thought it was: Wendy Davis, running for governor of Texas, made all the proper ceremonial incantations and appeared in heroic postures on all the right magazine covers, but finished in the 30s on Election Day. With young people trending pro-life, that old black magic ain’t what it used to be.
For the Left, it feels like time is running out. So it isn’t sufficient that same-sex marriages be legalized; bakers and florists must be locked in prison if they decline to participate in a gay couple’s ceremony. It isn’t sufficient that those wishing to undergo sex-change surgery be permitted to go their own way; the public must pay for it, and if Bruce Jenner is still “Bruce” to you, you must be driven from polite society. It isn’t enough that the Left dominate the media and pop culture; any attempt to compete with it must be criminalized in the name of “getting big money out of politics.” Not the New York Times’s money, or Hollywood’s money, or the CEO of Goldman Sachs’s money — just the wrong sort of people’s money. Every major Democratic presidential candidate and every Democratic senator is on record supporting the repeal of the First Amendment’s free-speech protections — i.e., carving the heart out of the Bill of Rights — to clear the way for putting all public debate under political discipline.
Like it or not, you will be shackled to hope and change.
The hysterical shrieking about the fictitious rape epidemic on college campuses, the attempts to fan the unhappy events in Ferguson and Baltimore into a national racial conflagration, the silly and shallow “inequality” talk — these are signs of progressivism in decadence.
So is the brouhaha over the Confederate flag in South Carolina in the wake of the horrific massacre at Emanuel AME Church. For about 30 seconds, the political ghouls of the Left were looking to pick another gun-control fight, swooping in, in their habitually indecent fashion, before the bodies had even grown cold. But that turned out to be a dead end, since the killer acquired his gun after passing precisely the sort of background check that the Left generally hawks after a high-profile crime, regardless of whether it is relevant to the crime. We might have spent some time thinking about whether law enforcement was too lax in the matter of the murderer’s earlier encounters with them — the South Carolina killer had a drug arrest on his record but was able to buy a gun because he had been charged only with a misdemeanor. But the Left isn’t in any mood to talk about whether the cops aren’t being hard-assed enough. So, instead, we had a fight over a completely unrelated issue: the Confederate flag flying at the state capitol in Columbia.
You have to credit the Left: Its strategy is deft. If you can make enough noise that sounds approximately like a moral crisis, then you can in effect create a moral crisis. Never mind that the underlying argument — “Something bad has happened to somebody else, and so you must give us something we want!” — is entirely specious; it is effective. In the wake of the financial crisis, we got all manner of “reform,” from student-lending practices to the mandates of Elizabeth Warren’s new pet bureaucracy, involving things that had nothing at all to do with the financial crisis. Democrats argued that decency compelled us to pass a tax increase in the wake of the crisis, though tax rates had nothing to do with it. A crisis is a crisis is a crisis, and if a meteor hits Ypsilanti tomorrow you can be sure that Debbie Stabenow will be calling for a $15 national minimum wage because of the plight of meteor victims.
I bear no brief for the peckerwood-trash cultural tendencies that led Fritz Hollings, then governor, and the rest of the loyal Democrats who ran segregation-era South Carolina to hoist the Confederate flag in 1962. My sympathies are more with John Brown than with John Calhoun. Yet Lost Cause romanticism was very much in fashion for a moment, and not only among Confederate revanchists; Joan Baez, no redneck she, made a great deal of money with her recording of “The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down” in 1971. About every third Western of the era had as its hero a conflicted Confederate veteran, his wounded honor and stoicism in defeat compelling him to roam westward in search of a new beginning. That story lives on into our own time: Who are Mal Reynolds and the Browncoats if not another remnant of the Lost Cause relocated from Virginia to the frontier in space?
Of course the Confederate flag is a symbol of Southern racism. It is a good many other things, too, none of which was the cause of the massacre at Emanuel AME. It is strange and ironic that adherents of the Democratic party — which was, for about 140 years, not only the South’s but the world’s leading white-supremacist organization — should work themselves up over one flag, raised by their fellow partisans, at this late a date; but, well, welcome to the party. Yet Democratic concern about racist totems is selective: The Democrats are not going to change the name of their party, cancel the annual Jefferson-Jackson dinner, or stop naming things after Robert Byrd, senator and Exalted Cyclops of the Ku Klux Klan. Hillary Clinton is not going to be made to answer for her participation in a political campaign that featured Confederate-flag imagery.
The Confederate flag, and other rebel iconography, is a marker of Southern distinctiveness, which, like American distinctiveness, is inextricably bound up with the enslavement and oppression of black people. But only the South is irredeemable in the Left’s view, and it has been so only since about 1994, when it went Republican. Which is to say, the Confederate flag is an emblem of regional distinctiveness disapproved of by 21st-century Democrats. Their reinvigorated concern is awfully nice: When the South actually was a segregationist backwater that African-Americans were fleeing by the million — when Democrats were running the show — they were ho-hum. Today the South is an economic powerhouse, dominated by Republicans, and attracting new African-American residents by the thousands. And so the Left and its creature, the Democratic party, insist that Southern identity as such must be anathematized. The horrific crime that shocked the nation notwithstanding, black life in Charleston remains very different, in attractive ways, from black life in such Left-dominated horror shows as Cleveland and Detroit, and the state’s governor is, in the parlance of identity politics, a woman of color — but she is a Republican, too, and therefore there must be shrieking, rending of garments, and gnashing of teeth.
This is a fraud, and some scales are starting to fall from some eyes. Americans believe broadly in sexual equality, but only a vanishing minority of us describe ourselves as “feminists.” “Social-justice warrior” is a term of derision. The Bernie Sanders movement, like the draft-Warren movement of which it is an offshoot, is rooted in disgust at the opportunistic politics of the Clinton claque. Young people who have heard all their lives that the Republican party and the conservative movement are for old white men — young people who may be not be quite old enough to remember Democrats’ boasting of their “double-Bubba” ticket in 1992, pairing the protégé of one Southern segregationist with the son of another — see before them Nikki Haley, Bobby Jindal, Susana Martinez, Carly Fiorina, Tim Scott, Mia Love, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Elise Stefanik. None of those men and women is bawling about “microaggressions” or dreaming up new sexless pronouns. None belongs to the party that hoisted Dixie over the capitol in South Carolina either. Governor Haley may be sensitive to the history of her state, but she is a member of the party of Lincoln with family roots in Punjab — it isn’t her flag.
What’s going to happen between now and November 8 of next year will be a political campaign on one side of the aisle only. On the other side, it’s going to be something between a temper tantrum and a panic attack. That’s excellent news if you’re Ted Cruz, Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, or Carly Fiorina. It’s less good news if you live in Baltimore or Philadelphia.
There is a lot in this I agree with, and a whole lot I do not.
Of course, all these actions stemming from Charleston are pre-planned. Waiting for the right event, the right time and a coordinated push.
The reason why all this is happening is to divert the country away from the real problem - Obama, his policies and the slate of replacements on tap to take up the mantel. Divert from Hillary’s debilitation, Benghazi, @clintonemail.com, Clinton Foundation and a plethora of other elephants in the room.
Couple that with an obvious red herring with which to slather potential Republican candidates with “What is your stand on the [ooga booga] flag?”
It’s all been sitting there in cold storage, waiting.
The best thing is to stop talking about it, because it is a conversation that can’t be won in the media. Let the respective states officials decide what to do and then let their constituents decide about what they did.
Just a note here: Jefferson and Jackson would waste no time whatsoever attacking tge modern DNC headquarters and burning it to the ground for treason against the country.
Great piece. Kevin Williamson is becoming my favorite writer at National Review.
The band released “The Night they drove old Dixie down” well before Joan Baez did. And what’s more she sang it with the wrong lyrics.
CC
“Of course the Confederate flag is a symbol of Southern racism. “
And right there his entire argument fell apart. He is partaking in exactly what the left it.
Excellent article and your comments are right on the mark. You could add “Rally the Base” particularly the black voter base as a major motive for the pre-planned events.
And, IMHO, The Left is enjoying great success with this strategy, at least in terms of totally dominating the news cycle. Because of this my Fox News participation has dropped to near zero since I refuse to waste my time watching successful Dem Propaganda Campaigns play out on TV.
The Communists continue to advance with little resistance...they are probably shocked that it has been so easy.
Everything the Left touches turns to crap. We’ll see if they drive us all to societal suicide.
I don’t think the leftist era is waning. unless lightning strikes and the congress strikes down the TPP (first time in history), passage of the TPA means we are entering into a new very dark future of communist new world order.
Agreed! Is it wrong of me to believe in the Confederacy because they didn't want to be subsumed by an ever-growing Federal leviathan? In many ways, the ideas of the Confederacy and the reason for its existence mirror the ideas of the anti-Federalists. The government has grown to a point of being almost insurmountable today, and I believe the Confederacy stood for states rights more than the statism we deal with now.
Am I out of line thinking this? Any FReeper historians want to set me straight?
bfl
It doesn’t matter what the Stars and Bars really stood for.
THE LEFT has said it stands for racism. And THE LEFT owns the agenda.
No, we have NOT reached peak Leftism.
We will reach that point, when the US version of the Katyn Forest occurs; when the proglodytes haul people out in the streets and slit their necks; and a turd-colored Stalin declares himself Preezy-for-Life.
Because the end game for Leftists is the death of their opponents. They’ve only been telling us since the 60’s.
And right there his entire argument fell apart. He is partaking in exactly what the left it.
I wouldn't say it fell apart, but the author certainly undermines it and damages his credibility. In resorting to such a cheap, uninformed and inaccurate cultural libel he's definitely using the same leftist tactic.
That said, in the sense of revealing and explaining what the left is doing it's an excellent and timely article. Unfortunately, I disagree with his conclusion that the upsurge in extreme, rabid repressive actions the left is taking is an indication of their desperation and sense they may be vulnerable to blowback.
I believe that their behavior is more that of vicious, fanatical fighters who sense they have the upper hand and are going for the "kill", both figuratively, and soon literally. This lack of "killer instinct", the almost pathological compulsion to be "fair" or to compromise when an opportunity arises to finish off adversaries who will never extend them the same consideration, has always been one of the great weaknesses of conservatives.
History clearly shows that the ultimate progression of ascendant leftism is towards totalitarian repression and eventually murder of their opponents. The sad fact is that most Americans will be unable to realize and face this until it's too late to avoid it.
Beat me to it! You are correct, and I would only add that the tools available to today's totalitarians for such murderous repression, e.g. almost complete surveillance of every aspect of our lives via the NSA and other alphabet (and now, well-armed) agencies, ubiquitous cameras and drones, and the electronic resources of complicit corporate partners of government, e.g Google, Microsoft, Cisco, Verizon, etc., provide capabilities beyond the dreams of past pikers such as Hitler, Stalin or Mao.
“We Have Officially Reached Peak Leftism...”
I don’t think so.
The French Revolution ‘officially’ shoved the Monarchy out. But... the extremism went on. Except for the period of the First Empire, it became more and more rabid all the time... and it continues to this day.
France is a mess and will NEVER recover.
THERE’S a nice example for us to ponder
That my answer a question I have not seen posed as of yet: why is Charleston not burning?
DOH ! my = might ,clumsy fat fingers!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.