Posted on 06/15/2015 6:27:45 PM PDT by concernedcitizen76
Thousands of U.S. troops safeguard the border of South Korea. U.S. warships patrol the South China Sea to stand witness to the territorial claims of Asian allies against China.
U.S. troops move in and out of the Baltic States to signal our willingness to defend the frontiers of these tiny NATO allies.
Yet nothing that happens on these borders imperils America so much as what is happening on our own bleeding border with Mexico.
Over three decades, that border has been a causeway into the USA for millions of illegal immigrants who are changing the face of America — to the delight of those who think the country we grew up in was ugly.
All sides of this quarrel have been using the figure of 11 million people here illegally. In her new best-seller, "Adios, America!," Ann Coulter makes a compelling case that the real figure is close to 30 million.
If that is true, and if the next president embraces amnesty and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, that will mean the end to America as the Western nation we have been, and the beginning of America's life as what Ann calls, unapologetically, a "Third World hellhole."
Indeed, when we consider the certain consequences of a failure to secure the border for six more years, and amnesty for people already here illegally, igniting a new invasion, we should ask ourselves:
What problem do we Americans confront that will be more easily solved with millions more immigrants?
Between 80 and 90 percent of those coming are from Third World nations. On average, they have higher illegitimacy rates than native-born Americans, higher drug use rates, higher rates of obesity, spousal abuse and child abuse, higher rates of disease, lower test scores and higher dropout rates, and higher crime and incarceration rates.
Children of immigrants are more gang-oriented. And Third World immigrants consume more per capita in social services than they pay in taxes. Hence they contribute to fiscal deficits at every level of government.
Will millions more immigrants help solve our infrastructure crisis?
Undeniably, poor immigrants provide cheap labor for businesses and the rich. But their working- and middle-class American neighbors bear the social costs that they inflict upon communities.
Politically, immigrants from Third World countries, as they rely upon government for food, housing assistance, health care and the education of their children, support the Party of Government.
Mitt Romney lost the two fastest-growing major minorities, Hispanics and Asians, who now account for more than a fifth of our population and a seventh of our voters, by 40 points.
And as their numbers and voting percentages rise, the GOP will find that reaching 270 electoral votes is not only more difficult than in Reagan's day, it has become impossible.
Among the myths or lies drummed into the heads of Americans is that we have always been a "nation of immigrants," and "diversity," i.e., racial, ethnic and religious diversity, "is a strength."
But America in 1970 was a white nation with a black minority of about 10 percent. And, as Coulter writes, "Nearly the entire white population of America from 1600 to 1970 came from a geographic area of the world about twice the size of Texas. The entire black population came from an area of West Africa about the size of Florida."
Is ethnic, racial and religious diversity truly a "strength"?
Why then has the most diverse region of Europe, the Balkans — with its Serb, Croat, Albanian, Slovenian, Macedonian, Turkic peoples, and Catholic, Orthodox and Islamic religions — had the bloodiest history?
Was it not racial and ethnic diversity that tore the Soviet Union into 15 nations and half a dozen subnations, and is tearing at it still in the Caucasus?
If diversity is a strength, why is Beijing, which worships strength, moving millions of Han Chinese into Tibet and western China to swamp the Tibetan and Uighur peoples, as they have done to the Mongolian and Manchu peoples? How did diversity work out for Rwanda and Burundi?
If diversity is a strength, then why are Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen falling apart? Why are Sunni and Shiite, Palestinian and Israeli fighting? Why are Scots, Basques, Catalans, Venetians and Flemish agitating for secession and independence?
Has the addition of tens of millions of Asian and African Muslims strengthened the Old Continent that ruled the world? Or do they imperil its security and survival as the cradle and heartland of the West?
As racial, ethic and religious hatreds pull people apart and create terrorists all over our disintegrating world, why would we make ourselves ever more diverse?
Writes Coulter, "Roe v. Wade can be overturned. Obamacare can be repealed. Amnesty is forever."
Anyone concerned for the future of this country as one nation and one people should find a candidate who will commit to secure the border, enforce immigration laws against businesses that hire illegal immigrants, and pledge no amnesty for the duration of their presidency.
As long as we keep electing Democrats and moderate Republicans, hell yes.
If you keep importing immigrants from hellholes you’ll eventually be a hell hole
That’s the idea.
I’ve had my tagline for years. I’ve not yet felt the need to change it. Even if I wanted to, I’m too damn tired from pulling that cart.
Barring Divine Intervention, Yes.
We are well on our way for sure. I am in NYC alot and when walking the streets outside of the touristy areas, it seems like I am walking on a street in São Paulo, Somalia or Haiti. Or - in some of the towns in my immediate area, the change is noticeable just in the last year or two - immigrants, most of whom I am sure are illegal, are all over the place, hanging in supermarket parking lots hoping to be picked up by contractors to be employed for the day.
Fundamentally transforming America, yup!
This should shock a few...Obama’s plan is to “Colonize” this nation......looks like his Buzzword Transforming was a tad deceptive.
......”Hatched by the U.N. and the American Left, the resettlement agenda is dedicated to erasing our culture, traditions and laws, and creating a compliant, welfare-dependent multicultural society with no understanding of America’s constitutional framework and no interest in assimilation. The ultimate target is a voting base large enough for the Left’s long-sought “permanent progressive majority.”
Most people would be shocked to know that America currently takes more refugees from the world’s ghettos than all other refugee resettlement countries in the world combined. The State Department brags about it. Furthermore, most of those refugees are referred to the United States by the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). The refugees (and the illegal aliens flooding the southern border from Central America) are then “resettled” by taxpayer funded “Voluntary Agencies” or VOLAGs as they are called.
There are nine of them, six nominally religious, but all are in it for the money and top staff make high six figures. Together the VOLAGs are paid close to $1 billion in taxpayer dollars to resettle refugees. Two more organizations who settle most of the unaccompanied alien children (UAC) brought the total to over $1.3 billion last year.
Best case scenario I see is the country breaks up and those who believe in the constitution control a small area of land in their own sovereign nation. Again, that’s my best case and probably overly optimistic prediction.
Imagine a pristine mountain lake.
Now imagine a 12” pipe pumping raw sewage into it for the last fifty years.
I like Mark Levin’s Swiftian proposal. However, Levin has repeated it much too often for it to be a joke. He said let the liberals take X states, the ones too far gone. Let the conservatives take the others. I agree with his inference that no compromise is possible between modern liberals and conservatives. How can a free man or free woman compromise with an ideology that strives to abolish individual sovereignty, tantamount to the enslavement of body, mind and soul?
Worthh looking at....
Refugee Watch has a host of information of the thousands coming here and the buzz words Obama’s using to sidestep the public from knowing what’s really going on ....the numbers coming here are astounding!! Thousands upon thousands......
Here’s some of the article..
One of the many things that I found revealing about the conference.....was that problems with the program to resettle over 100,000 “refugees and asylees” to your towns and cities each year was not discussed (your classic hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil!). .....There was no direct discussion about problems with assimilation, tensions in communities, crime problems, cost to local communities, school conflicts, housing shortages for refugees etc. except for one session dedicated to how to silence people who might like to complain—the keynote speaker talked about how ‘Welcoming America’ was working to get YOUR minds right about your new refugee neighbors (and, they received a federal grant from ORR to do it!).
Before Susan Downs-Karkos from ‘Welcoming America’ spoke, we had been alerted by the Office of Refugee Resettlement’s Director of Placement, Mitiku Ashebir that (gasp!) “three pockets of resistance against new arrivals” had developed. He assured the gathering it was not widespread and that Pennsylvania, thankfully, was not one of them.
The “refugees” are comprised of a large number of trojan horse terrorists. They current administration which is comprised of many MB members knows this and they are being brought here to settle and then rise up and subjugate the incredibly stupid apatheic American people whom they regard as same and deem unworthy of living in a land like this. They know that with the administrations assistance it will be a cakewalk to take over and conquer this land with the feminized faggot male population. “Oh you guys didn’t realize that was part of the plan? We were going to kill you afterwards because you are unworthy of living because you are such cowards and prefer a man’s anus over the way nauture intended it to be. You fell for it suckers. Now step to the platform and prepare to fly!”
Minnesota CAIR succeeded in strong-arming prison into allowing inmates to wear islamic headbags.... 'Somali' women are in prison at the Hennepin County Jail convicted of funding terror in 2011 there
It’s already happening for most, with many of the rest to follow soon.
Dr. Grahm has been clear about this as well.....he's outright called it on Obama....and also that his advisors are Islamic Radicals....but he also says any that attend the Mosques are radical...because those who don;t want anything to do with Islam don;t go.
I heard a Man from Africa whose face had been burned off by Islamists there....that the USA needs to stop this now...that what the US is doing is populating Islam throughout the world for the Islamists... via these refugees and catering to the Muslims in our government.
This reposting of a transcript of a February 2015 interview that blew the lid off the secret agenda (bluntly, repeal and replace white America) seems appropriate to the discussion.
House will vote Friday to prevent Homeland Security shutdown
02/28/2015 1:11:43 PM PST · 47 of 52
concernedcitizen76 to Whenifhow
This is a transcript of Mark Levin’s two public conversations with Sue Payne of WCBM-AM, the first on 24 Feb 2015 and the second on 26 Feb 2015. Links to Mark Levin Show podcasts for two dates in question are also provided with time mark indicated.
I) Time mark 1:46:20. Mark Levin Show podcast, 24 Feb 2015.
Sue Payne: Thank you, Mark. I wanted to inform you that two weeks ago I attended three conference calls with members of the White House: Cecilia Monuz and folks that are putting together this amnesty mill for Obama.
SP: With the series of three, I took extensive notes...
SP: Let me tell you what they said. What went on in the call is that the immigration groups, they call themselves the Task Force for New Americans, this is what Obama called them. What the immigrant group said was that they did not want they did not want the American citizens and the president to get the wrong idea of this amnesty, that they are not interested in assimilating, they are interested in navigating. And their new call was: we want to navigate, not assimilate. And what they want to navigate is the benefits in this country. They have no intentions of becoming American citizens because they feel like their home country is somewhere else. But they want the benefits. And, in fact, some of the women on the call said that the citizens of this country need to realize that these immigrant women, their best job is to stay home with their children, and that we should be giving them money and...
[Hard break for commercials interrupts, but their public conversation continued two days later on 26 Feb 2015.]
II) Time mark 1:30:50. Mark Levin Show podcast for 26 Feb 2015.
http://www.marklevinshow.com/common/page.php?pt=podcasts&id=191&is_corp=0#
Mark Levin: Yesterday, you may recall we had a call from a lady named Sue who was invited, apparently unbeknownst to the President’s folks, to listen in on a discussion, a phone discussion, at a rally that was taking place, of some sort, about immigration. Sue, how are you?
Sue Payne: I’m very good. Thank you for having me on the show.
ML: Now, Sue, who can also be heard on WCBM on the weekends I learned, Sue Payne. Sue, we don’t have a lot of time so go ahead and summarize what took place on that call.
SP: Well, what took place on the call was there was the Task Force on New Americans, which Obama established on November 21st [2014]. Remember when he went to Las Vegas, the media said he was signing an executive order for five million illegal aliens to become deferred. In reality, what he did was sign a memorandum that created the Task Force on New Americans, which was going to implement his amnesty mill for the five million illegals, which I believe is going to be more than that, Mark. I think he [Obama] was planning, and on these conference calls it became clear that he’s looking at 13 [million] to 15 million to give protection and move them on to citizenship. What happened in the conference calls was there was a representative from 16, each of the members of his cabinet. So there were 16 representatives there, and Cecilia Munoz was on the first call.
ML: Hold on now. And she [Munoz] is a top advisor to the President on this and a former senior official with LULAC, er, La Rasa, La Rasa.
SP: La Rasa, yes. And she’s chairing this task force. And so what became clear is that once these illegals come out of the shadows, so to speak, their communities that they’re living in now are going to be redesignated as receiving communities, and what this task force is designed to do is to create a welcoming feeling among these receiving communities to bring in these immigrants, bring them out in the open. But the receiving communities will then soon morph into what was established, an emerging immigrant community. And to do that, what they said was that we need to start looking at the immigrant as a seedling and for the seedling to grow, the seedling needs to be in fertile soil.
ML: Alright, let’s hold on. OK, we’ve got the seedling, the fertile soil in these new communities. Good Lord, this sounds like Plato’s Republic. It sounds like Marxism; it sounds like Mao’s China.
[Commercial break]
ML: Now we’re going to go back to Sue. So, Sue, we have these special little communities and seedlings and fertilizer and then what?
SP: Well, eventually the seedlings will take over the host, and the immigrants will come out of the shadows. And what I got from the meetings was they would be pushing the citizens into the shadows. They would be taking over the country. In fact, one of the members of the task force actually said that we [the task force] would be developing a country within a country. There was a couple of buzzwords that were really disturbing to hear. That was one of them. One was from the White House spokesman (who) said that immigrants need to be aware of the benefits they are entitled to, which led to another comment saying that this group that Obama’s going to pardon or give amnesty to would not be interested in assimilating. They would navigate, not assimilate—and go into our benefits.
ML: OK, stop there. That’s very, very important. So, these are officials in the White House talking about people not assimilating but navigating. And you know, Sue, this plays right into what Obama was saying, and I played a clip of that, where, again, he’s not talking about assimilation, either. He’s actually talking almost, he doesn’t use the word, about conquering. Did you get that impression?
SP: Oh, yes, especially when it became very clear the receiving communities would be morphing into the emergent immigrant communities. And he also, there was also a couple of other things that were very disturbing. One was that, as soon as this decision is pushed through, these immigrants need to be treated as refugees. They need to be given cash. They need medical care. They need to use credit cards to pay for any documents that they need. And, also, we [the task force] need to convince state and local governments to cut these people no interest loans with taxpayer dollars so they can then pay for their papers. [pause]
SP: As if we were funding our own destruction here.
ML: This is amazing. What amazes me, Sue, is how this has progressed, how advanced this strategy is. Obviously, it’s been in the works for years and years. It’s just incredible. And if you hadn’t been on this phone call [task force conference calls], we wouldn’t even know about this.
SP: No, you wouldn’t. It was a series of three calls. And, Mark, also they said there was going to be a great deal of older immigrants in this batch. And that we [the task force] needed to make sure the receiving communities knew that the older or elderly unskillled can contribute to these receiving communities, and that the government should understand that immigrants need to age successfully. [garbled] And we need to get them into Social Security as soon as possible so that they can age successfully within their country within a country.
ML: This is unbelievable, what’s going on inside this country, inside the gates of the White House, uh, without any authority, without the knowledge of the American people. I feel like this a completely surreptitious government. I feel we’re the ones who are in the shadows. I feel like we’re the ones being cut out of the information flow. Like I said, this is no republic. I don’t what the hell this is.
SP: Mark, in closing, I just want to say that what’s scary about this vote that’s going on right now about the Homeland Security and funding or defunding Obama’s executive order is that they spoke in this call about their willingness to leverage federal funds. And what I got from that was that if this thing goes through, and they fund Homeland Security, then all these cabinet offices will be willing to just leverage their funds.
End
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3262112/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.