Posted on 03/11/2015 8:23:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
Given that, the act, or what one DOES, still IS a choice, regardless of what one IS.
THIS.
Everyone comes out of the womb sexually equipped by God to either be a pitcher or a catcher in order to be fruitful and multiply. After that, it's all about who is training you, what you learn to do and what you accept as a personal choice. Homosexuality is, by default, a dead end proposition. If those practicing homosexuality had no ability to recruit outside of their fringe cult, the world would be free of the depravity in a few generations. This is why homosexuals prey on the young. It's a sick and twisted way to justify their own existence as demented freaks and keep their practice alive.
Have them look at some “gay rights” web sites.
My daughter’s best friend from childhood chose to have a boyfriend.Then she chose to have a girlfriend. She recently chose to have a boyfriend again. So obviously its not a choice.
HOMOSEXUAL, because there's nothing GAY about it.
The rise of the Anti-Christ and the rise of the Nephellium.
Oh, THAT Savage...
(In my best homo lisp) He’s thutch a thavage...
Meredith Baxter decided in her 60’s that she’s gay. Bob Tur, the photographer, said on TMZ that before his “sex change” to be a “woman” that he was never attracted to men. After hormone treatment he became attracted to men. When Bob (his name change escapes me and I don’t want to google it) made that point, Harvey skipped over it pretty quickly and didn’t ask any questions. Does that mean homosexuality can be cured?
I don’t care if it is “in” their genes or not. It is an aberration and NOT normal and by NO means a license to parade that it is.
Because humans have a wide variety of natural emotions, desires and thoughts, it is worthless to ask if a particular sexual attraction is a matter of choice or not. Who chooses what emotions and desires they will have? The better question is: of all the emotions and desires a person might have, which are moral to entertain and which are immoral and must be rejected?
Asking if having gay feelings is a choice dodges that question entirely. We are told, if a person feels something, it must be natural. What if a person feels he should murder or abuse someone else? A person with normal thoughts knows to reject any hatred that rises to the level of wanting to hurt or kill someone else. Why is it any different with sexual feelings? I think only because too many people want to excuse the moral implications of sexuality.
But I think it is deeper than that. God clearly tells humanity what His rules of sexual morality are. He clearly states in several places such as Revelation 22:15 that those who are sexually immoral cannot inherit the Kingdom of God. So, I think that some people use sexual expression as a way of rejecting God and His moral laws.
I saw a prison documentary, a man saying exactly what Carson said, he came in straight and left gay...was rearrested for male prostitution.
Sexuality is not as locked-in as many would have you believe. There’s been studies on identical twins, where one is gay and the other isn’t. If it was purely genetic this couldn’t happen. They also found that over time many of the “gay” twins actually turned more hetero, many to exclusively hetero - leading to the conclusion that there’s probably more ex-gays out there than in the current gay population. Although the left will not allow any discussion on ex-gays because they know it is true.
This is all taboo though and not allowed in discussion. If real science on the topic were allowed it would be at odds with the gay narrative.
“Gay” is not something you ARE. It is something you DO. You may not be able to choose what you ARE. But you can choose what you DO.
Then the result showing 63% believe gays should have a legal right to adoption should really confound you. It does me. How can there be a higher number for adoption than marriage?
Slight problem. If the Nephilim were human/demon hybrids, they all died in the Floor. Long before Sodom or Gomorrah.
There is no connection at all in the Bible between Sodom and the Nephilim.
There is reference to Nephilim around this time and at the time of Joshua. Exactly what means is an interesting question. But there is no connection to Sodom.
For one man to convince another man to get in bed naked with him isn't just one little choice along the way but thousands of choices. It requires years of committed study and practice to become an actual homosexual.
Philosophically, I believe "Gay" is mostly a lifestyle and people who are, stay that way in comfort with themselves.
I think we all ought to let it go....and stop trying to make each other feel bad.
Thank you Dr. Carson. You are a brave soul.
Adoption by gays is really tragic. Take for example the story of David Tuterra, that wedding planner guy, and his so called “husband.” “Husband” wanted a divorce because he had grown tired of Tuterra’s need to bring a third man into their bedroom. Problem was, these perverts had a surrogate pregnant with twins. Perverts got divorce, surrogate had babies, each sexual deviant got themselves a baby to play with. Didn’t hear about this on the news, did you? It got buried pretty damn fast, for obvious reasons.
In the years to come, when all these children adopted by homosexuals start to come out about what they witnessed (or worse, forced to participate in), the shit will hit the fan. But it will be too late.
Here is an example of the excessive meanness in this horrible and unnecessary debate.
Was that a world-wide floor?
Meredith Baxter decided late in life that she was a lesbian.
A male member of the pop group Culture Club admits to a long term relationship with Boy George. He later decided he wasn’t homosexual, married a woman and had kids.
Anne Heche, lover of Ellen DeGeneres, went back and forth a couple of times. Married to a man, then Ellen’s lover, then back to men.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.