Gabby Giffords: Everyone Should Have to Pass Background Check My Attacker Passed

Breitbart.com ^ | 03/04/2015 | AWR Hawkins

[E. Pluribus Unum]

On Wednesday, gun control advocate Gabby Giffords stood with Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill to demand that everyone buying a gun be required to undergo the same background check Jared Loughner underwent to acquire the Glock he used to shoot her in 2011.

[DiogenesLamp]

Another dope head thread. Loughner was a marijuana user.

[demshateGod]

So, liberals shouldn’t be able to own guns? Works for me.

[hadaclueonce]

her husband should have taught her how to duck.

[Paladin2]

I thought Gabby was hit by a 22lr.

[Responsibility2nd]

Brain damage is a terrible thing. Poor Gabby.

[NEMDF]

‘cuz that worked out so well for her, him being scrutinized so much, right?

[RetiredTexasVet]

Remember that she wasn’t all that bright before she got shot in the head by one of the children of her Progressive constituents.

[manc]

Thought those kind of druggies were all peaceful or so I am told

[lee martell]

Give it up Gabby. No need to keep putting your self on display in front of the cameras. Why don’t you and your ex-astronaut go buy that Llama Farm you’ve been dreaming of?
Go for it!

[muir_redwoods]

She really did take one to the head, didn’t she?

[gundog]

9 mm

[driftless2]

Yes indeed, stricter background checks would definitely stop deranged individuals from acquiring firearms. Just like all those strict firearm laws in France stopped those Muzzie killers from getting automatic weapons. Works real good. (snicker)

[Blood of Tyrants]

Liberal sympathizers are unsympathetic to the argument from the Bush administration that a post-9/11 world requires expanded executive authority to suspend habeas corpus and detain individuals indefinitely, or to eavesdrop on Americans’ phone conversations, or to torture terrorist suspects. In those instances the Bush administration says the need to protect Americans from wanton violence justifies infringing on American liberties. But liberals are quite adamant that saving lives is not a sufficient rationale for abandoning principles.

Yet when the subject turns to the right of American citizens to own guns, many liberals suddenly find that the goal of saving lives justifies just that.

[kennedy]

Because the background check was so effective at stopping him from getting a gun?

[Osage Orange]

Loughner was more than that..............

[OSHA]

Shoot a liberal in the head? It's only a flesh wound.

[Osage Orange]

I’m just going to say it,,,,that comment was totally insensitive and wrong!!

[musicman]

Less Than $900 To Go!!
Don't Put Off 'Till Tomorrow
What You Should Do Today!!
Please Help "Clean Up" The FReepathon
With A Donation For This Quarter

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The background check is about registering guns and gun owners.