Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"The Other Islamic State We Should Be Most Worried About"
The Aspen Times (CO) ^ | February 12, 2015 | Melanie Sturm

Posted on 02/12/2015 7:41:59 AM PST by Aspenhuskerette

Imagine catching a lethal, fast-growing, yet operable cancer in a child before it’s spread. The doctors assure a high survival rate, assuming traditional protocols. Meanwhile, a third opinion proposes no treatment, believing the child can coexist normally with cancer.

Entrusted with the awesome responsibility of ensuring the child’s healthy future, how long would you Think Again before opting to remove the cancerous “Sword of Damocles” — and fear — hanging over precious life?

Alas, too often leaders charged with safeguarding life have sacrificed it on the altar of “normalization,” preferring inaction to threat-mitigating, albeit difficult, operations.

Regretful that Western powers didn’t avert World War II by restraining Hitler, Winston Churchill lamented, “There never was in all history a war easier to prevent by timely action than the one which has just desolated such great areas of the globe.”

Today, a confrontation-wary world faces another genocidal, fanatical and global threat: Radical Islam and its various savage and infidel-hating manifestations. Like the Nazis, who pursued a “master race” through ethnic cleansing, Islamic radicals seek a sharia-compliant “master faith” — though disagreeing on the master — to crush other faiths, including Islamic ones.

If the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria is radical Islam’s “JV” team, as President Obama called them, Iran is its Olympic team. Long recognized by the U.S. government as the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism, Iran is the planet’s “most dangerous regime,” the title of Ted Koppel’s documentary about the anti-Western theocracy. Required by Allah to wage global jihad until their Messiah’s return, apocalyptic mullahs uphold their constitution’s commitment to “a universal holy government and the downfall of all others.”

(Excerpt) Read more at aspentimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iran; islamicterror; israel; lebanon; nucleariran; obamairan; waronterror; yemen
Obama's engagement of Iran has been a secret policy since he took office in 2009 and explains the apparent lack of strategy that he's often accused of. Not only is his policy a break with decades of US foreign policy consensus, it is perhaps the world's gravest concern.
1 posted on 02/12/2015 7:41:59 AM PST by Aspenhuskerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette

The plan is to normalize relations with Iran and N. Korea before he is out.

Those are just two of his 4th quarter things.


2 posted on 02/12/2015 7:44:28 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette

Good call.

It’s very likely he has allied himself with the Mullahs in Tehran — and against America.


3 posted on 02/12/2015 7:45:13 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette
Long recognized by the U.S. government as the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism, Iran is the planet’s “most dangerous regime,”

Several years ago when the "Arab Spring" phenomenon was taking place, Obama was speaking up in support of the "democracy" movements which in actuality were takeovers by radical jihadist movements. He was supportive of almost all of them except Iran which was supposedly a truly democratic movement. Obama said nothing and did nothing and Iran's pro democracy movement was squashed by the jihadists.

Thanks Obama for giving the world a new emboldened and more radicalized than ever Iran.

4 posted on 02/12/2015 8:16:20 AM PST by Perseverando (In Washington it's common knowledge that Barack Hussein Obama is ineligible to be POTUS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette
The truth is we can’t coexist with a metastasizing cancer like a nuclearized Iranian terrorist state. That’s why, in 2010, the Senate voted 99-0 — against Obama’s wishes — for intensified sanctions, which have since been relaxed, and it’s why there’s overwhelming bipartisan support to restore those sanctions’ negotiation-strengthening effect. Entrusted with safeguarding civilization’s future, shouldn’t our leaders act while the cancer is operable?

Of course they should, but who do you think is Statesman enough to step forward and take the lead?

Perhaps Bibi will be a catalyst, but it needs to be soon with deadlines like March 24th looming in the near future.

5 posted on 02/12/2015 8:40:18 AM PST by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette

Until you deal with Saudi Arabia’s funding of terrorism, you can play whack-a-mole indefinitely.


6 posted on 02/12/2015 9:52:35 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Until you deal with Saudi Arabia’s funding of terrorism, you can play whack-a-mole indefinitely.

I don't understand why more people don't get that. Any presidential candidates facing this truth?

7 posted on 02/12/2015 9:54:51 AM PST by hlmencken3 (“I paid for an argument, but you’re just contradicting!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hlmencken3

Everybody knows, they just don’t talk about it. They have us by the short hairs with oil, and they know it.


8 posted on 02/12/2015 10:05:16 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette

There is no chance for success for a policy to reach an agreement that yields anything to a state whose only foreign policy is terrorism followed by a threat of missile-delivered nuclear weapons.


9 posted on 02/12/2015 10:08:25 AM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Dianne Feinstein: Democrat in all but name Ron Rand Paul: Hillary: by contrast, a Democrat who's not running for POTUS: The Biggest Turd in the Punchbowl: the rest of the backstory:
10 posted on 02/12/2015 12:48:59 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette

A sad story to be sure, but we can only hope that our government does nothing to intervene. The currrent modus operandi is to spend American lives and American treasure to lose wars in the long term.


11 posted on 02/12/2015 3:08:50 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (There is only one party, the uniparty, and corruption is its credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan
That's what I think, too.

He's going for the royal flush of enemy States of the US, and will call them ‘friends’.

THIS is our current President: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/02/12/which-image-of-obama-mugging-for-buzzfeeds-cameras-diminshes-the-presidency-the-most-ranked/

I am appalled. And aghast.

12 posted on 02/12/2015 3:18:27 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

13 posted on 02/12/2015 6:06:57 PM PST by SJackson (“ISIS is now going to regret this … because King Abdullah is not Barack Obama, Rep. Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette; All

“The Other Islamic State We Should Be Most Worried About”,

Washington, DC

Not being sarcastic...


14 posted on 02/12/2015 6:18:11 PM PST by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does - by their fruits ye shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aspenhuskerette

Remember GW Bush’s “Axis of Evil” speech in the aftermath of 9-11-01 listing Iran, Iraq, and North Korea?

Nothing new here.


15 posted on 02/12/2015 7:46:06 PM PST by lightman (O Lord, save Thy people and bless Thine inheritance, giving to Thy Church vict'ry o'er Her enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson