Is there presently a penalty for a man’s using a women’s restroom, or vice-versa?
Sounds like a great bill to pass!
Force the faggots to use an outhouse back in the woods.
Are those automatic trans people or manual trans people?
Once they got gay marriage they will demand other things, including full and unhindered access to your children
The business can be sued if they let men in the women’s room and the real women are upset
This is what you get when you allow things to get out of hand with accommodations for faux marriage , faux gender alteration , special rights here there and everywhere... you eventually have to draw the line sometime... and this far down the road it all seems ridiculous.
If this passes I’ll visit the local gay club , be quite offended , and sue half a dozen tranny’s including the singer on their outside marque ...
What; Are the toilet police going to be inspecting the ‘crotchtal area’ of all ‘public’ toilet users?
I suppose it would be kind of a giveaway if someone wearing a dress or having major protuberances in the ‘chestal area’ is using a urinal in a men’s room. Use a stall, and no one is going to know, unless they already know, or unless the subject is a really, really bad tranny.
All seems pretty silly to me.
The problem is that “transgender” means too, too many things. Those that feel like they should have a dangler, those that are ‘thinking’ about having the dangler removed, those that pretend that the dangler is removed, and those few that actually have the figurative ‘stones’ to actually do it.
Go ahead, browse Google for a true, clear definition of “transgender”....you’ll sift through a bunch of sick crap that will still leave you not knowing exactly what it is. I tried it once (finding out the “what is it?” stuff, not removing the dangler part :0) )
Knowing this, I can most certainly feel empathy for any lady that is uncomfortable with the potential of having a dangler/dangerless thing using the same bathroom as me.
Well, at least the author was objective and showed no left wing bias.
so if your wife takes your 3 yr old grand daughter into the ladies room and there is a man dressed like a woman in there, i think the tranny sumbitch ought to gonto jail. perverted assholes.
I quit reading when the article stated, “...from using the bathroom that matches their true gender.” Are all Slate “reporters” homosexual? They have no grasp of reality, or they’re pushing the homosexual agenda, constantly.
they should use the bathrooms consistent with their anatomies
problem solved.
(whatever they wish to do when they get home, is their own business)
The answer is simple: all bathrooms are unisex!
Every one pees and craps in one huge equality pile!
Think of the money saved!
Just one set of chinaware...half the tp!
Y chromes should never use the X restrooms.
This is just as urgent as the Latest UC Berkeley fad of introducing “transgender study of agriculture.”
See this article:
Are transgender birds and bees coming next?
Solution....sign = “NO PUBLIC RESTROOMS”
Whatever happened to the good old days, when transgender people would be locked in a padded cell, with and receive a new jacket? You know, the kind where the sleeves are longer than your arms, and go all the way around your back.