Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missing Link or Another Fish Story?
Institute for Creation Research ^ | 11-24-14 | Frank Sherwin

Posted on 11/25/2014 4:40:02 AM PST by fishtank

Missing Link or Another Fish Story?

by Frank Sherwin, M.A. *

Recently there has been some celebration from the Darwinian community regarding a discovery of a fossil 1 that allegedly links terrestrial animals to their future aquatic relatives: the ichthyosaurs.

Cartorhynchus lenticarpus is proclaimed by some evolutionists to be an amphibious ancestor of the ichthyosaurs, aquatic reptiles whose name means "fish lizards." Rachel Feltman of the Washington Post was jubilant, saying this "fossil could prove a problem for creationists."2

(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: creation; fish; piltdownman; storkzilla

ICR article image.

1 posted on 11/25/2014 4:40:03 AM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Oops, clicked on the link before I saw the source.


2 posted on 11/25/2014 4:43:50 AM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Another classic hand waving, just so story for the religion of Darwin


3 posted on 11/25/2014 5:30:56 AM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
Quote: "Oops, clicked on the link before I saw the source."

Yeah, nothing worse than clicking on a non-approved source and being exposed to a balanced, footnoted article that contradicts the "truth" one has been indoctrinated in since childhood.

4 posted on 11/25/2014 5:37:33 AM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

where are the fish with the leg buds? This one looks like it has fully formed feet. Doesn’t evolution show a scale becoming a feather or does the full feather gene just appear? What about multiple genes controlling things? Is that comparable to winning 3 or more lotteries in one day?

Just wondering.


5 posted on 11/25/2014 5:49:45 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimmyray; Sawdring; fishtank
You are not supposed to be talking about the footnotes because if you start pointing people towards the footnotes, they will start wondering why Sherwin wrote about the WaPo article rather than the Nature magazine article.

They will also notice nothing about the actual research paper, and realize that if someone(like Sherwin) wants to dispute the research, he needs to dispute the research rather than disputing articles written about the research.

6 posted on 11/25/2014 6:50:01 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring

me too..... I’ll immediately depart the balderdacious drivel


7 posted on 11/25/2014 6:51:38 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson