Posted on 10/23/2014 11:30:25 AM PDT by redreno
The lesbian mother of a 7-year-old boy is appealing to the Nevada Supreme Court to keep her son in Las Vegas during her four-month deployment to Cuba.
According to an emergency petition filed by Air Force 1st Lt. Michelle Angeles, Family Court Judge William Potter applied a double standard when he ruled the boy must live with his father in Texas until she returns.
“Michelle could only infer the double standard stemmed from her being married to another woman,” according to the document.
The child flew to Texas on Saturday when the high court declined to intervene on an emergency basis. The mother’s lawyer, David Mann, said they now will proceed with a regular appeal.
Angeles, formerly known as Michelle Bagalawis, divorced the child’s father, Johnny Cardona, in January 2012. Both serve in the U.S. military.
(Excerpt) Read more at reviewjournal.com ...
I don’t even want to know how they have messed up that kid
Great -— lesbian woman, a mom with child, off shore in military ... what could go wrong ?
After Angeles learned she was going to be deployed, she filed a motion to keep the child in Nevada with her wife, Suzanne, who has been helping care for the child for more than two years.
The father is the father, not the other lesbian.
They will twist ANYTHING in to “discrimination” or a “double-standard”.
The boy’s biological mother is going on a military deployment to Cuba.
The boy’s biological father live in Texas and will be at home.
The boy needs to go live with his biological father while his mother is deployed.
The unrelated “stepmother/father/whatever” has NO rights in this matter.
He left out the pesky little detail that such placements are WITH the other biological parent's consent.
She is being deployed to, ‘Cuba’? What the heck is that all about?...
Gitmo...
It doesn’t matter if she is a lesbian or into animal husbandry.
She knew the rules when she signed up.
Throw her a** in the brig and prosecute her for refusing her assignment.
Uuuuuhhhhhh, sorry, it’s called “A Family Care Plan.” You signed it, you know what is in it, now STFU and execute your orders, they are still called orders or are they called invitations under this new CIC.
If he is, case closed, he goes to the dad.
Good Lord. There’s a pair of sisty uglers.
She didn’t refuse any assignment. But i don’t see why she waited until she was going to be deployed to challenge the custody order.
To delay her deployment?
Uuuuuhhhhhh, sorry, it’s called “A Family Care Plan.” You signed it, you know what is in it, now STFU and execute your orders, they are still called orders or are they called invitations under this new CIC.
Let me be clear — The family care plan says who gets your child as a single parent when you are mobilized. Once you receive your orders the debate is over the child goes where the child was designated to go. Case over no more discussion. Or, the biological gets custody in the absence of a FCP...not debating whether or not she chose to execute her orders. Stating a fact. Trust me, executed the FCP three times, I am quite familiar.
The other women is not a legal guardian..
it would be like wanting to leave the child with a step parent who has not legally adopted the child..
it appears that the biological father who was married to the mother when the child was born is the legal guardian with visitation rights..
unless hes unfit as a parent he should have the child..
You apparently don’t get it. The normal rules don’t apply when it involves sodomites. (Is a sarcasm tag really needed?)
Make that biological and legal father.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.