Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Attacks in Baghdad kill at least 50 people
AP ^ | 10-16-2014 | AP

Posted on 10/16/2014 11:43:25 AM PDT by tcrlaf

Militants unleashed a wave of attacks in Iraq on Thursday, mainly targeting Shiite areas in and around the capital of Baghdad, killing at least 50 people and wounding dozens, authorities said.

The Islamic State group has overrun vast areas in western and northern Iraq as well as parts of neighboring Syria, and has vowed to destabilize and eventually take over Baghdad.

It claimed responsibility for the day's deadliest strike. In that attack, two parked car bombs exploded simultaneously in a commercial area in the northern Dolaie neighborhood, killing 14 civilians and wounding 34 others, a police officer said.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted2.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: baghdad; freedomanddemocracy; iraq; isil; isis
Meanwhile, in Iraq....

Guess what WON'T be making the network evening news shows tonight?

1 posted on 10/16/2014 11:43:25 AM PDT by tcrlaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

This will continue to happen until the Shias get up off their asses, screw up their courage, and defeat ISIS. I read that when this all went down in the summer, the Iraqi army outnumbered ISIS 10:1 and STILL ran away.


2 posted on 10/16/2014 11:49:39 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

When ISIS takes Baghdad, does that mean, they ‘win’?

We obviously won’t be sending in ‘boots on the ground’ to beat them back.

At that point, I guess it will be a race to see which will take it first, The Saudis, or Iran. Meanwhile poor little Kuwait will be nervously watching.

As with everything else, the 0bozo “Administration” will already have a plan for blame deflection ready to go. It will either be “Bush’s Fault” or the House Republicans.....


3 posted on 10/16/2014 11:56:56 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

I think it was even posted in these forums, the Shia’s have also had reprisal attacks.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/shiite-militias-kill-sunni-civilians-iraq-revenge-isis-attacks-n225791

They are duking it out in Yemen too apparently.


4 posted on 10/16/2014 12:03:12 PM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

What’s happened to the guy who thought he was the Emperor of Sadr City? Has he melted away in the face of this threat when his blustering nonsense will only get him killed?


5 posted on 10/16/2014 12:04:11 PM PDT by armydawg505
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf
The Islamic State group has overrun vast areas in western and northern Iraq as well as parts of neighboring Syria, and has vowed to destabilize and eventually take over Baghdad.

ISIS has to destabilize Baghdad so that ISIS can prevent an Iraqi Government forming there that can organize resistance against them.

ISIS should have many Sunni sympathizers in Baghdad amongst the general population that can help them in this goal against the Shiites and the foreign Infidels and their Muslim collaborators in Baghdad. -Tom

6 posted on 10/16/2014 12:06:39 PM PDT by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse U.S. citizens and Americans. They are not necessarily the same. -tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
When ISIS takes Baghdad, does that mean, they ‘win’?

If Baghdad falls to ISIS, there will be a huge stream of Shiites south and into Iran. I would expect that at that point Iranian Revolutionary Guard units would become directly involved - a second Iran/Iraq war, if you will. Should be quite a show.

7 posted on 10/16/2014 1:02:14 PM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

>When ISIS takes Baghdad, does that mean, they ‘win’?<

.
Yes.

When Baghdad falls, we have lost our chance to insert boots on the ground in Iraq. Where else do we have the facilities to fly large numbers of people and materiel in?

Tell me if my thinking is false.


8 posted on 10/16/2014 1:26:24 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Not ideal but Basra might work. It’s large city, respectable infrastructure and an international airport. Umm Qasar is just down the road with its considerable port facility.


9 posted on 10/16/2014 1:37:47 PM PDT by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie

So now we land in Basra and have to travel a long distance to where the enemy lies in waiting? Retaking Baghdad from ISIS will not be like conquering the city when Saddam Hussein was in charge.

ISIS fighters have proved to be more ferocious than the American-trained Iraqi army. The battle for Baghdad will be a huge bloodletting. American people will protest because of loss of American lives.

Not very efficient war waging, is it?


10 posted on 10/16/2014 1:55:45 PM PDT by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

There have always been attacks in Bagdad killing 50 people (ok sometimes it’s 35 people or 47 people).

This has been going on pretty much continuously since Sadaam Hussein was on the run.


11 posted on 10/16/2014 2:00:13 PM PDT by Lorianne (fed pork, bailouts, gone taxmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

When isis takes baghdad what will the US do with its at-least-a-billion-dollar embassy? Is it a large mobile home and they can just pull it away?


12 posted on 10/16/2014 3:04:31 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

new ISIS Hdq


13 posted on 10/16/2014 3:06:00 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

Maybe Clown Prince nobola could have former prez carter present it to isis(given that he has experience giving American property away for nothing).


14 posted on 10/16/2014 3:07:51 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

It’ll be a nice pad for ISIS.

We were soooooo stupid to put that much money into such an ediface. I can’t describe how stupid we were. There probably isn’t a word or series of words to describe what a stupid waste of money and resources that was/is.

Defending it would be even stupider if that is even possible.


15 posted on 10/16/2014 4:14:54 PM PDT by Lorianne (fed pork, bailouts, gone taxmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Good points. Sorry not, if anyone can fight an inefficient war it’s the US. /s


16 posted on 10/19/2014 5:49:37 AM PDT by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PeteePie

*worry not. Sent from my iPhone ( damn it)


17 posted on 10/19/2014 5:51:40 AM PDT by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson