Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Both the pro and anti Second Amendment Justices in the Heller and McDonald decisions could have granted cert. After Robert's behavior with Obamacare, neither right nor left want to take any chances with him, not on really important decisions, IMHO.
1 posted on 02/25/2014 10:10:08 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Pretty much the left owns every political position they want. The gun thing was the last one they didn’t have control of.


2 posted on 02/25/2014 10:13:05 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I believe it takes only the votes of four justices for the court to take a case. Obviously at least 6 justices didn’t think there was anything to decide and that the lower court was right.


3 posted on 02/25/2014 10:14:25 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Let the lower courts do the dirty work, then decline to enter the fray.

Nice.

Obama approves.
Congress is AWOL. Again.


4 posted on 02/25/2014 10:14:27 AM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

These are puny peripheral issues.

The important cases are the state bans of semi-auto rifles, and the defacto state bans on bearing arms outside the home.

They won’t duck those.

And once it is established that the “right to bear arms” includes carrying a loaded pistol outside the home, it will then be the right time to extend that to 18-20 year old adults.

The case in which DC residents can’t buy in VA will be largely addressed when DC gets their rights more fully restored.


5 posted on 02/25/2014 10:16:25 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

C O W A R D S ! ! ! ! !.................


6 posted on 02/25/2014 10:17:32 AM PST by Red Badger (LIberal is an oxymoron......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

In my opinion, someone wants these cases to wait until there are more leftists on the the SCROTUS.


8 posted on 02/25/2014 10:26:42 AM PST by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Who gives a crap what the law says anymore about this?

We have a lawless president, a lawless AG and a lawless congress.

Why should we worry about laws when they aren’t enforced by the “lawmakers” or “enforcers”?

They can’t shoot us all.


11 posted on 02/25/2014 10:33:12 AM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“...dating back to 1968, that make it illegal for firearms dealers to sell guns or ammunition to anyone under 21...”

There is no federal law against selling guns/ammo to those under 21.


15 posted on 02/25/2014 10:46:13 AM PST by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

16 posted on 02/25/2014 10:48:18 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

18 posted on 02/25/2014 10:54:19 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Basically the SCOTUS refusing to wade into politically turbulent waters because they’re wusses. That was why they were given lifelong employment, to be able to stay above such considerations. Another in a long line of indicators that our republic no longer works.


20 posted on 02/25/2014 10:55:53 AM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Crooked lawyers with black robes.


21 posted on 02/25/2014 10:55:58 AM PST by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; All
I'm not expert in gun law history, but federal gun laws for civilians seem to appear in the books during the FDR's presidency when the federal government began to blatantly ignore its constitutionally-limited powers.

Also, note that John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, had officially clarified in the congressional record that the 14th Amendment applied the 2nd Amendment to the states. See the 2nd Amendment in Bingham's discussion roughly in the middle of the 2nd column of the page at the following link.

Appendix to the Congressional Globe

24 posted on 02/25/2014 11:33:36 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Free people don’t need to ask permission.


26 posted on 02/25/2014 11:35:41 AM PST by Tzimisce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The fix is in?


28 posted on 02/25/2014 11:38:16 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bkmk


37 posted on 02/25/2014 12:54:46 PM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The court will decline any case that strengthens gun rights.
They accept all cases where they can weaken them.

The US courts are no longer on our side.


38 posted on 02/25/2014 1:09:59 PM PST by CodeToad (Keeping whites from talking about blacks is verbal segregation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Some perspective here, folks. It took SC(R)OTUS over 70 years to take on Heller from the last seminal 2A case which was Miller.

As it stands, the really interesting case is the one in the 9th circus. That one is not ripe for an appeal to SC(R)OTUS until we see what happens en banc. If it stands en banc, then I think we’ll have a day in court.

Heller notwithstanding, I’m not a fan of the go-to-court strategy. Trusting our liberties to 9 political hacks in black muumuus just doesn’t appeal to me.


40 posted on 02/25/2014 1:43:11 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (Liberty in our Lifetime - WWW.FreeStateProject.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
and America takes another one in the........

42 posted on 02/25/2014 2:58:30 PM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson