Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eight Botched Environmental Forecasts
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/12/30/botched-environmental-forecasts/ ^

Posted on 01/06/2014 7:07:47 AM PST by MNDude

Predicting the weather -- especially a decade or more in advance -- is unbelievably challenging. What's the track record of those most worried about global warming? Decades ago, what did prominent scientists think the environment would be like in 2010?

1. Within a few years "children just aren't going to know what snow is." Snowfall will be "a very rare and exciting event."

2. "[By] 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots…[By 1996] The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers."

4. "Using computer models, researchers concluded that global warming would raise average annual temperatures nationwide two degrees by 2010."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: envirowacko; europeanunion; globalwarming; news; predictions; science; weather; wrong

1 posted on 01/06/2014 7:07:47 AM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MNDude

That would explain the reports of SNOW in Los Angeles we’ve been hearing, on and off, over the past few years. . .


2 posted on 01/06/2014 7:17:46 AM PST by Salgak (http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

0 for 8


3 posted on 01/06/2014 7:18:00 AM PST by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Go back another 20 years and the same people were predicting global COOLING because of pollution.


4 posted on 01/06/2014 7:23:39 AM PST by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Usually these predictions are laced with “if,” “could,” “may,” and “might.”

Only a couple of these, 4 and 6, use the magic qualifiers. The others all use “would” and “will.”

But they are still wrong.


5 posted on 01/06/2014 7:29:06 AM PST by Right Wing Assault
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

I remember when we all had to give up our cans of hairspray and they come out with something to replace the Freon in refrigeration units because the global ice age was on the way.


6 posted on 01/06/2014 7:32:22 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

THEY, at least had SOME science behind them. Because we KNEW back then, that we were in an Ice Age, currently between Continental Glaciations, and that another was due Real Soon Now (geologically speaking. . .)


7 posted on 01/06/2014 7:37:00 AM PST by Salgak (http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999

It has never been proven that Freon causes any harm to anything! Junk Science at it’s finest.


8 posted on 01/06/2014 7:41:40 AM PST by gr8eman (How ya doin Bob?...Bitchen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Some of these phony predictions are by Paul Ehrlich, A person who has NEVER managed to predict anything correctly, yet still has quite a large following following of deluded loons


9 posted on 01/06/2014 7:53:04 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
I remember when we all had to give up our cans of hairspray and they come out with something to replace the Freon in refrigeration units because the global ice age was on the way.

Don't forget that pulling the Freon out of the process of putting the insulation on the external fuel tank brought down the space shuttle and eventually killed the program.

10 posted on 01/06/2014 8:21:01 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

In the 70’s the Earth was cooling and were were going to have an ice age within 10 years...


11 posted on 01/06/2014 9:08:09 AM PST by Farnsworth (Now playing in America: "Stupid is the new normal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

You posted exactly what I was going to say! I can’t think of a single thing that this “expert” has ever predicted that has come about. Yet he is idolized by the media and brain dead followers. He is defing the laws of chance which says that at least sometime you have to be correct. Maybe what he gets correct is that when he puts on his shoes every morning the right and left one are from the same pair. On the other hand I don’t know if that would be too good for a person that appears to have two left feet and a couple of extra a**holes.


12 posted on 01/06/2014 10:07:22 AM PST by Nuocmam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Thanks MNDude.
13 posted on 01/06/2014 11:14:47 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuocmam

Years ago I used to correspond to an ex-academic who at one time worked for me. He was a decent cobol and CICS coder, but his Phd was in something like biostatistics or ecology. On one occasion in an email I raised the question if he knew of any even marginally public figure (outside of politicians who lie as part of their jobs) who was wrong more than Paul Ehrlich. He responded that he didn’t ever want to hear from me again. Worked for me. Apparently I blasphemed, and rather than open any logical discourse he ran and hid. What a jerk.


14 posted on 01/06/2014 11:56:54 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MNDude; All

They had me on the “global cooling” when they started talking about this in 1970. I’m against “global cooling”.

I WANT “global warming”! Especially today.

More “global warming” = more plants to feed the population.

More “global warming” and I’m happier than being cold.

Still I don’t think the specks on earth can change either.


15 posted on 01/07/2014 7:34:50 AM PST by The Bat Lady (I will be voting against Cornyn in the TX primary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gr8eman; McGavin999
It has never been proven that Freon causes any harm to anything! Junk Science at it’s finest Yup

However banning it did wonders for the bottom line at Dow chemical and big international pharma.
16 posted on 01/07/2014 9:38:40 AM PST by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson