Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Same-sex couples in Utah getting marriage licenses
FOX 10 ^ | 12/20/2013 | Brady McCombs

Posted on 12/20/2013 2:45:50 PM PST by LonelyCon

A county clerk's office in Utah is issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, just hours after a federal judge struck down Utah's ban on gay marriages.

Salt Lake County Deputy Clerk Dahnelle Burton-Lee says the district attorney authorized her office to begin issuing the marriage licenses Friday.

She couldn't immediately say how many licenses have been issued so far.

U.S. District Judge Robert J. Shelby ruled that a law passed by voters in 2004 violates gay and lesbian couples' rights to due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment.

Shelby said the state failed to show that allowing same-sex marriages would affect opposite-sex marriages in any way.

The Utah attorney general's office says it plans to issue a statement on the ruling later.

The decision marks an ongoing nationwide shift toward allowing gay marriage.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: gay; homosexualagenda; judge; lds; marriage; mormon; mormonism; romneymarriage; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: LonelyCon
"She couldn't immediately say how many licenses have been issued so far. U.S. District Judge Robert J. Shelby ruled that a law passed by voters in 2004 violates gay and lesbian couples' rights to due process and equal protection under the 14th Amendment. "

Ain't it amazing that those guys who passed the 14th amendment 150 years ago and all those states that ratified it were so friendly to homo marriage? < /s >

Do these courts even look at original intent anymore, or do they just make it up as they go? (Sorry, rhetorical question.)

41 posted on 12/20/2013 3:36:02 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ransomed
I wonder if this one goes to the SC if the will interpret it like CA’s prop. 8 or if this is the end of state marriage amendments everywhere.

That depends on if a state official man's up and defends it. Remember, the Prop 8 case was simply remanded for lack of standing, not on its merits. It actually still exists in California. Only, the Leftist Governor and AG refused to defend it.

42 posted on 12/20/2013 3:36:10 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: knarf

No it was the “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit”. Still doing the same thing, 2,000 years later. Come on in son, the water’s fine.


43 posted on 12/20/2013 3:36:32 PM PST by NKP_Vet ("Rather than love, than money, than fame, then give truth" ~ Henry David Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Merry Christmas every one


44 posted on 12/20/2013 3:37:01 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
It will help make polygamy legal.

I lived in Saudi Arabia five years and worked with 30 Saudis. I asked ALL of them, over the years, about polygamy. THEY all had one wife and they ALL said: "One wife is enough." :o)
They said that ONLY the wealthiest of men could afford more than one wife. They were all adamant about that and all said the same thing--one wife is enough.

Side note: off the topic.
I remember hearing a group of our workers (almost all uneducated older guys) talking about something quite adamantly. They kept repeating the word: SAYAREET. I asked about it later.
My boss told me that the men were all having trouble with their 18-year-old sons. Their sons didn't want to work or go to school; they just wanted to drive around all day in their CARS--sayareet. :o)
I laughed and told him that OUR 18-year-olds were pretty much the same.

45 posted on 12/20/2013 3:38:50 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
Isn't it telling how we now see solid jurisprudence completely being discarded? In any normal case, such a decision would have required several weeks of examination, the chance for the defenders to appeal, and a cooling off period before implementation. This was staged by the sodomites from the beginning. They were given advanced notice of this decision, and the fact that it would not be stayed, and were probably waiting at courthouse doors when the decision was "given."

Highest corrupt collusion we've ever seen.

46 posted on 12/20/2013 3:40:05 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon; Colofornian

Next you’ll be hearing about gay polygamist marriages.


47 posted on 12/20/2013 3:42:00 PM PST by Gamecock (Celebrating 20,000 posts of dubious quality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

It’s the media.

And it won’t stop until radio, TV and newspaper offices around the country are sacked by an outraged populace.


48 posted on 12/20/2013 3:44:02 PM PST by Walrus (America died on November 6, 2012 --- RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Yes, the children who become wards of these same gender unions suffer. I am watching it happen to several sibling groups in our school right now. My kids have classes with them, so I see up close the emotional damage. I ache for those young people and the horrible situation that is being forced on them to satisfy the nurturing instinct (or worse) of the guardians that God and nature would have denied parenthood to.


49 posted on 12/20/2013 3:44:03 PM PST by mom of young patriots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mom of young patriots
Yes, the children who become wards of these same gender unions suffer.

It is odious, and the problem is not that the kids may be molested. In fact, that is what the gay activists claim their critics are saying in order to discredit them. The real problem is that kids have an ingrained psychological need for both a mom and a dad, and a same-gender pair can NEVER provide for that need.

50 posted on 12/20/2013 3:53:06 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain
Why is allowing blacks and Indians into their conclaves bad and losing the "real world of Jesus Christ"

The Catholic Church never had such a ban. There were black Christians before their were European ones.

51 posted on 12/20/2013 3:56:39 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steve86
"Only observant Catholics will fight through to the end."

Maybe in some dream world. The Hartford Archdiocese is financing the pro-gay movement organizing efforts.

http://uact4justice.org/

They successfully defeated several pro-life legislators recently and replaced them with progressives.
52 posted on 12/20/2013 4:02:34 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT (h2h? head-to-head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Why is allowing blacks and Indians into their conclaves bad and losing the "real world of Jesus Christ"
I DIDN'T say either of those two things. You read the wrong message. What I DO think is weird is that the Mormons believe that Jesus and Lucifer were/are brothers! Whaaaat? How did they EVER draw that conclusion???

The Catholic Church never had such a ban. There were black Christians before their were European ones.
I know.

53 posted on 12/20/2013 4:08:27 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
You guys justify like democrats

Merry Christmas

54 posted on 12/20/2013 4:56:26 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .. I have no proof .. but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Thank you, John Roberts. Your recent homosexual decisions paved the way for this. Liberal and RINO judges are having a field day.


55 posted on 12/20/2013 5:04:27 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Wow. Two states this week, New Mexico and Utah, legalize gay marriage. We are on a roll now.
Waiting for the lightening strike.


56 posted on 12/20/2013 5:10:47 PM PST by SisterK (behold a pale horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Thanks.

Freegards


57 posted on 12/20/2013 5:17:33 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cloudmountain

Even the Mormons couldn’t stem the flow of the sodomite urge to marry and reproduce...
________________________________________

Eh ???

what Mormon tried that ???

Willard, the leader of the Mormon political party introduced same-sex marriage into MASS when he was gov there...

Willard is the father of same-sex marriage...

Harry Reid the man of the year for the Mormons has pushed same-sex marriage for years..


58 posted on 12/20/2013 5:21:45 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

Can’t the state just refuse to recognize the right of a single federal judge (or any federal entity for that matter) to tell a sovereign state that they have to violate their own Constitution (and a perverted - literally - reading of the Federal one)?


59 posted on 12/20/2013 5:22:21 PM PST by utford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Before I go let me be the first to say that the number of Catholics that voted for Romney dwarf any protestant denomination in the country. Without Catholics voting for Romney he would lost by a lot more than he did. What should concern you is 96% of black PROTESTANTS that voted for your boy. They all go to church and claim to be Christian. Same thing goes for hypocritical Jews, who voted for the nothing by 75%. So try getting your protestant friends to vote for republicans or Hillary Clinton will be the next president.


60 posted on 12/20/2013 5:26:40 PM PST by NKP_Vet ("Rather than love, than money, than fame, then give truth" ~ Henry David Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson