Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utah’s Gay Marriage Ban Is Ruled Unconstitutional
NYT ^ | 12/20/13

Posted on 12/20/2013 2:03:01 PM PST by Oliviaforever

SALT LAKE CITY — A federal judge on Friday struck down Utah’s same-sex marriage ban, saying it was unconstitutional.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lds; mormon; mormonism; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: fwdude

The polygamy ruling was just restricting Utah from prosecuting people for cohabitating, it did not keep them from prosecuting bigamy. It was based on and brought by the people on that Sister Wives show, IIRC. They were being charged even though he’s only legally married to one of those ladies. The judge felt that Utah’s law went too far.


21 posted on 12/20/2013 2:12:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (A courageous man finds a way, an ordinary man finds an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

No mention of an appeal. Typical NY Slimes selective “reporting.”


22 posted on 12/20/2013 2:12:43 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
If Justice Anthony Kennedy had a soul, he would realize the monster he has unleashed with his DOMA decision.

He handed the vicious sodomites a huge club with which to beat normal Americans.

23 posted on 12/20/2013 2:13:49 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

utter B/S, soon it will be all states with fed judges choosing to ignore the 10th


24 posted on 12/20/2013 2:13:56 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

So polygamy has to be legal, marrying your sibling must be legal. Where will it end?


25 posted on 12/20/2013 2:14:30 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
And the anarchy continues.

Anarchy is defined as the complete absence of government.

Personally, I'm straight; but I know some homosexuals and I think they have rights beyond your personal imagination.

26 posted on 12/20/2013 2:15:08 PM PST by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The polygamy ruling was just restricting Utah from prosecuting people for cohabitating, it did not keep them from prosecuting bigamy. It was based on and brought by the people on that Sister Wives show, IIRC. They were being charged even though he’s only legally married to one of those ladies. The judge felt that Utah’s law went too far.

BUT, it will be construed to mean that they MUST be recognized, just as Lawrence v. Texas, made sodomy "legal" nationwide, was cited extensively to force counterfeit marriage on multiple states.

Yes, this is the Lawrence of the polygamists.

27 posted on 12/20/2013 2:16:25 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Phil Robertson for president!


28 posted on 12/20/2013 2:16:31 PM PST by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

here is a thought , if those homosexuals want their sham then they can move to places like MA and stay there but we all know this is not about marriage , this is about a bigger homo agenda and closing down the first and tenth amendments.

The amount of homosexuals I;ve seen and know of who have moved out of places like CA and MA and then come south telling us all how they are married is stunning.

They are not married here and they should go back north or the west coast if they want their perverted sham


29 posted on 12/20/2013 2:16:57 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Hey judge - I declare your ruling unconstitutional. Two can play this game.


30 posted on 12/20/2013 2:17:41 PM PST by lesko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

You apparently have no idea what “rights” are, Leftist.


31 posted on 12/20/2013 2:17:46 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

weird that because I searched and searched and found nothing that they have a right to marry


32 posted on 12/20/2013 2:17:51 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

It really would work better if Federal judges at least read the Constitution once.


33 posted on 12/20/2013 2:18:08 PM PST by Ingtar (The NSA - "We're the only part of government who actually listens to the people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Loving v. Virginia is the way that SCOTUS will ultimately rule on same-sex marriage.

It’ll be almost the same decision verbatim, with necessary changes re: same-sex couples/interracial couples.

I figure in less than five years. Maybe as few as two.


34 posted on 12/20/2013 2:19:02 PM PST by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
Personally, I'm straight; but I know some homosexuals and I think they have rights beyond your personal imagination.

****************************

What do you mean?

35 posted on 12/20/2013 2:20:19 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: trisham

And don’t forget to thank Donald Trump for letting transsexuals in beauty pageants.

And of course it’s unconstitutional to not let boys be voted the prom queen or girls the prom king now.

Hollywood will probably repeal best actor and actress Oscars soon and make those awards unisex.


36 posted on 12/20/2013 2:21:13 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
Where will it end?

Societal collapse, ruin and domination by stonger nations...probably not if our lifetimes but eventually. The trend is still reversable, but every passing day makes a reversal less likely.

37 posted on 12/20/2013 2:21:39 PM PST by matt1234 (Hitler blamed the Jews. Obama blames the Tea Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

It’s only un-Constitutional if you accept that FedGov has ANY authority to legislate in this subject.

Hint: They DON’T.

This is a State’s Rights issue.


38 posted on 12/20/2013 2:22:59 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever
Claire Wolfe, is it time yet?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

39 posted on 12/20/2013 2:23:38 PM PST by wku man (It's almost deer season, got your DEERGOGGLES on yet? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jexrnFq2fXY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

A very tiny segment of society can ruin a culture and a nation in the age of mass communications.


40 posted on 12/20/2013 2:23:40 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson