Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The polygamy ruling was just restricting Utah from prosecuting people for cohabitating, it did not keep them from prosecuting bigamy. It was based on and brought by the people on that Sister Wives show, IIRC. They were being charged even though he’s only legally married to one of those ladies. The judge felt that Utah’s law went too far.

BUT, it will be construed to mean that they MUST be recognized, just as Lawrence v. Texas, made sodomy "legal" nationwide, was cited extensively to force counterfeit marriage on multiple states.

Yes, this is the Lawrence of the polygamists.

27 posted on 12/20/2013 2:16:25 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude

Loving v. Virginia is the way that SCOTUS will ultimately rule on same-sex marriage.

It’ll be almost the same decision verbatim, with necessary changes re: same-sex couples/interracial couples.

I figure in less than five years. Maybe as few as two.


34 posted on 12/20/2013 2:19:02 PM PST by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: fwdude

Polygamy has a long history, including many Biblical figures such as Abraham, Moses, Kings Saul, David, Solomon and many others as well as Simeon, Ezra and etc. Please show me one place before the modern era that same sex marriage was practiced widely.


53 posted on 12/20/2013 2:43:48 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (A courageous man finds a way, an ordinary man finds an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson