To: 2ndDivisionVet
The polygamy ruling was just restricting Utah from prosecuting people for cohabitating, it did not keep them from prosecuting bigamy. It was based on and brought by the people on that Sister Wives show, IIRC. They were being charged even though hes only legally married to one of those ladies. The judge felt that Utahs law went too far. BUT, it will be construed to mean that they MUST be recognized, just as Lawrence v. Texas, made sodomy "legal" nationwide, was cited extensively to force counterfeit marriage on multiple states.
Yes, this is the Lawrence of the polygamists.
27 posted on
12/20/2013 2:16:25 PM PST by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: fwdude
Loving v. Virginia is the way that SCOTUS will ultimately rule on same-sex marriage.
It’ll be almost the same decision verbatim, with necessary changes re: same-sex couples/interracial couples.
I figure in less than five years. Maybe as few as two.
34 posted on
12/20/2013 2:19:02 PM PST by
AnAmericanAbroad
(It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
To: fwdude
Polygamy has a long history, including many Biblical figures such as Abraham, Moses, Kings Saul, David, Solomon and many others as well as Simeon, Ezra and etc. Please show me one place before the modern era that same sex marriage was practiced widely.
53 posted on
12/20/2013 2:43:48 PM PST by
2ndDivisionVet
(A courageous man finds a way, an ordinary man finds an excuse.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson