Skip to comments.
Utah’s Gay Marriage Ban Is Ruled Unconstitutional
NYT ^
| 12/20/13
Posted on 12/20/2013 2:03:01 PM PST by Oliviaforever
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
To: maxwellsmart_agent
agree, there is not one right we have that they do not.
They can marry the opposite sex just as we can.
Marriage is being defined to suit their sham marriage and we are all supposed to go along with all of it, no chance for this family
81
posted on
12/21/2013 12:02:46 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: Bratch
The Fourteenth Amendment played no role in this decision. In fact, I cannot determine any part of the Constitution that played a role.
82
posted on
12/21/2013 12:05:02 PM PST
by
Hoodat
(Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
To: GeronL
ask the judge to cite the part of the Constitution where they found this
Its not there.
Which means if falls under the purvey of the 10th amendment and thus to the individual states. Which is what the naive fools in the Senate and House thought argued would stand when Republicans held majorities in both during the Bush years and fought against an amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman--it was up to the individual states. Needless to say, the left doesn't sleep, doesn't respect federalism, and is quite willing to shove their way through by whatever means they can.
So there you have it. The 14th amendment all but destroyed the 10th amendment--at least if you accept any backwards and nonsensical belief as adopted by whatever liberal pervert group happens to be next.
To: OldNavyVet
You are not “straight”, they are not “gay.” You are normal. They are abnormal.
To: crusty old prospector; fwdude; trisham; Gene Eric
From Webster: "Bigot" ... "1, a person who holds personally and intolerantly to a particular creed, opinion, etc. 2, a narrow minded, prejudiced person"
Friends ... Open your eyes. They are out there, they are humans, they have rights and they have wrongs.
What would you do if you discovered your son or daughter was homosexual?
To: OldNavyVet
God created sexual relations as a means of procreating. Since their actions do not lead to procreation, it is not sex. It is an act of deviancy. Therefore, the term “homosexual” was coined in error.
To: OldNavyVet
What would you do if you discovered your son or daughter was homosexual? Why would that have anything to do with the nature of deviancy?
What would you do if you discovered that your daughter was a prostitute and your son was a burglar? Would you then champion their behavior?
87
posted on
12/23/2013 8:45:52 AM PST
by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: OldNavyVet
Of course they’re humans. My sister is a lesbian. What she’s doing is wrong.
88
posted on
12/23/2013 10:38:10 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: fwdude
What would you do if you discovered that your daughter was a prostitute and your son was a burglar? I'd accept them as family, and offer advice ... if asked.
To: OldNavyVet
If your daughter had an abortion, would you then accept abortion as a natural, civil right?
The objections largely concern the agenda that’s force-feeding homosexuality into Western culture.
90
posted on
12/23/2013 12:06:46 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-90 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson